>> |
No. 167243
>>167241 For people to share usernames, they must first have a Wii U.
Speaking of which, I'm able to just waltz right into Wal-mart and buy a Wii U if I wanted. The Basic model, though. It makes sense that the Deluxe model would sell out faster, but the fact that there are still Wii Us freely available at all shows a huge disparity of interest of launch between the Wii and Wii U. Everybody's had a chance to get a good tablet for four or five years now. (A bad tablet for far longer.) Adding that to a gaming console isn't nearly as impressive as the motion control was for the Wii.
Speaking of Wii vs. Wii U: http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/12/07/wii-u-was-once-a-wii-zapper-prototype >This prototype was so well-received that Shigeru Miyamoto himself forced a gyroscope to be added to the Nintendo 3DS, which by that point had its hardware finalized. And nothing of value was gained. >As is customary at Nintendo, this basic tech, which was effectively two Wii remotes duct-taped to an LCD monitor, became the starting point for over 30 game demos. >Two Wiis working together were used as a simulation for Wii U's actual computing power So the Wii U really is just two Wiis taped together.
Honestly, I think Nintendo should have taken their focus in a different path: Use most of their resources to make a highly powerful, but not bleeding edge, console; fine-tune the motion control even better and create an updated, separate, cordless Nunchuck with full motion control and extra buttons (I'm thinking that you'd pair the Wiimote/Nunchuck by using NFC and just touching them together); make the controller work better for "standard" button layouts.
Then they use this gen to research putting a screen in shit, which would come out far, far better. Adopt a "Windows"-like cycle, but instead of every other version sucking, it's just an upgraded version of the previous one.
|