So I've heard that Jolly Jack used to draw Sequential Art porn about 2 years ago, before deciding to keep them relatively clean. Apparently starring Art, Kat and Scarlet in various scene that go beyond the cheesecake that's still around.It was probably a troll but I'm curious. Has anyone seen anything like that before?
its a lie.jolly jack only used cheesecake to become popular (and $$$). his intention was always to get recognized on a legit level.Phil's catalogue of sketch porn is very limited for a reason. There is a very file line between cheesecake and sketch porn. Adam Hughes, legit, palcomix guy, never will be legit. As Kirk Lazarus said, "Everyone knows you don't go full retard"Plus, Phil doesn't put certain characters into sexual situations since they are based on family/friends he knows IRL.
I don't know about that last reason, since his cheesecake already crosses that line. Pic related.I can understand the need not to be seen as some sort of pornographer in the professional trade though. Dave Alvarez seems to want the 'fetish comic' origins of his Yenny character erased, so he can have her in a mainstream cartoon.I just figured that Phil did a few pics of character sexings as a gift for fans, before a grim realisation that he may want to clean up their image as a portfolio piece.
>>43711This is why I go by Zst Xkn, and not Scott.
>>43808KURTZ! I KNEW THAT WAS YOU!
This is now a Sequential Art /pco/ thread.
Jolly Jack is a faggot. >>43711He draws all kinds of fucked up fetish shit that's much worse than normal porn despite being less explicit, I kind of doubt that he's afraid of being ostracized or whatever.
>>44170like transformation, growth, giantess fetishthat stuffs not "fucked up" by our standards round here anymore
>>44170That's just, like, your opinion buddy. No need to sage threads, just because you think you're the authority on what artists are good or not.
>>44170
>>44209You sure this isn't paid material?
>>44211i wouldnt have paid for it
Seems these pics you cant buy as part of the Apsara pay for comics
>>44209 >>44210We see Jolly Jack misc stuff all the time. Let's stick to characters from Sequential Art.
>>44217
>>43702 I didn't know he ever drew porn of Sequential Art, only of his others like Chloe or aspara sketches.If anyone has those SA porns, then get em up!
>>44351Like I said, it was probably a troll to begin with. If there ever was SA porn, it likely only exists in Phil's harddrive or sketchbooks now.SA has also evaded the old Rule #34 by having no fan porn either, which seems a bit strange.
>>44355What a jammy bastard he is not letting us see, even if we know it's probably Scarlet giving Kat oral sex.
I stand corrected. There's two Kat pics.
>>44363>>44364they're by someone else
>>44365I meant my claim that there's no SA porn by anyone.
more more more
Not a lot more left.
needs more hot kat and hilary sexings
>>44547More like hot hate sex.Something needs to be done with Scarlet in it but I'm too worried someone turning that adorable nudest into a cumdumpster. I'd prefer something like >>44299 where she's just curious and unrestrained.
>>44549Kat and Hilary must have hot HOT angry hate sex. Using Cucumbers as double ended dildos. If anyone remembers, there was strip where Pip says she stuffed three of them in her as "Gabrielle Goodtime"Speaking of that name, I wonder if Jolly ever drew Hilary doing a porn short with those cucumbers?
I want to see some soft Kat/Art stuff :(
inb4 rule /34 (cuz noone is yet to provide proof that phil does anything but implied sexual situations with his SA chars)
>>44574Yes, please, some hot kat sexings
Am I the only one who thinks that regular Kat is sexier than 'sexy kat'?
>>44674I'm not sure what your definition is but any Kat is better then that... 'thing' in the fourth panel.It's stuff like that, that makes me hope Jack DOESN'T have SA poon. He would fetish them up Liefeld proportions and vaginas that could double as a place to store golf clubs.
>>44674I'd take either. They're both sexy in their own ways.
bump
We'll have to kidnap a drawfag from one of the other threads.
D'awww.
This isn't SA, but I can't resist posting it anyway.I honestly want to see Jack do something with his Battle Bunnies concept. A band of rabbit mercenaries going on high fantasy adventures and fighting an empire of tigers? Sounds good to me!
>>44724I hate it when women do crap like that. Unless they follow through with the hot sexings that is.
>>44364Anybody have an artist name? This looks like my kind of porn.
>>44747 artist is Vamptod, http://www.hentai-foundry.com/user-vamptod.php
>>44760 they're not bad, but would better if it was jolly who did them because then at least it would be canon, and it could all know kat likes taking a huge shaft in the snatch
>>44808I'm pretty sure that's already canon, judging by her frequent "jungle queen" fantasies.
These two are both one shot glass away from doing it right there on the couch.
>>44999A nice thing to see on my birthday.
We need Scarlet porn. Original JJ or not.
There isn't an uncensored version as far as I know. If there is I'd love to see it.
>>45159This is why I DON'T want to see Kat porn. He always uses these XBOX HUEG catmen.Fuck that, Art or nothing >:(
>>45164 Agreed. he needs to draw some more average looking bodies
Something to keep in mind: while Jack seems to dislike the idea of Scarlet porn, it may be likely that he has no such qualms concerning her sisters.
>>45204Yeah. It's like he attracts us with Kat and Scarlet with their 'modest' bodies but when it's sexy time, Jack seems to become possessed by Rob Liefeld and starts throwing proportions all out of wrack. Panel 4 in >>44674 just shows the differences.The man also needs to draw better sexy bits. Pic related but spoilered incase it's pay-per-view material. That tenticle is the size of her waist and she seems to have lost her labia in some awful accident.
>>45164To be fair, Jack did mention the Kat was one of his stand-alone characters before he made SA. So that pic could of been made long before there was an Art.Then again, where those Post-it censors a recent thing? Dammit Phil, stop toying with us!
>>45210Eh, I don't mind his anatomy. I suppose I'm just good at suspending my disbelief when it comes to this sort of thing. Also because I've seen much, much worse.
>>45210 i don;'t that's pay stuff since he posted it somewhere before...>>45234 agreed. postits need to die when you can obviously tell what's happening. Why does he need to censore it?
>>45264To taunt us.Duh.
>>45266i hate teases
Needs more Vanity.Vanity is sex.
>>45277
>>45278Wait, even better!
>>45277 Vanity is by far sexier than Kat. I think jolly should draw a vanity sex scene even if someone has to commision him to do it.
Bump for Scarlet.
>>45474More scarlet. more Kat. together. doing untold things to each other
>>45475I want a sequal of >>44299 with Scarlet sitting on Pip's bed, intendly looking the laid out porn mags and trying to copy the women on them.
>>45487 looks like person at the bottom had a bad day
>>45487I disagree with everything in this screen capture. Everything. That's almost profound.
JJ's been saying a lot of things lately (some smart, some not-so-smart), with that whole air of "I know what I'm talking about, fool--I draw a WEBCOMIC" that made Scott Kurtz and others so impossible to enjoy. He's turning his dA page into a soapbox and going out of his way to alienate people. Has that EVER worked well for an artist?
I like his stuff a lot, but goddamn it, how I disagree with EVERY cricic he does...
I don't really keep track of this sort of thing, but I don't think that Jack's rants are anything new. He's always had something to complain about; I mean, have you ever read his blog? You should, but mostly because he posts some quality art there that you won't find on his other sites. Like this one, for example.
>>45500...John K Peta? The guy who draws ECKBAWKSHUEG dicks going further into women than any dick should ever go?
>>45515...No, John Kricfalusi, the creator of Ren and Stimpy, well known for his "Cartoons today suck because they're not drawn the way *I* want them to be drawn!" attitude.
Why don't more webcomics have Rule34? Sure, there's a little GKC here and the old PA stuff, but I'm not seeing too much else.I know this is weird but I want to see Tallahassee Econolodge, Baby Lame, and Paperklip just jiggin' the hell out of each other. I wanna see Sara P and Jane Doe working out a rent payment. Why is there no Sinfest porn? (Or if there is, where is it?) Strawberry and Marissa? Roast Beef and Molly? Goddammit, don't make me to it myself!!
>>45524ew god damn dont nobody want no roast beef and molly 34 hell
>>45518Oh, well that's certainly a relief. I would've honestly lost all hope for the world if JKPeta had taken a soapbox stance...
>>45524 Sinfest Porn... I bet Monique would sell like hotcakes in cheesecake or pornographic situations in a more detailed style.As for SA, I wanna see more Kat, Hilary and Vanity Thorn porn.
>>45524>Why is there no Sinfest porn? (Or if there is, where is it?)Gee, if only there was a website that'd collect rule 34 pics
more Kat
>>45545Three soft-to-medium-hard pics and one dupe under "Monique," buried among a LOT more pics of the Kim Possible character. Yay. Yaaaaaay. YAAAAAAAAAY....Because there's only one babe in "Sinfest."(Well, at least the thumbnail issue seems to be resolved. Guess I can start visiting again.)
>>45498Damn, and he seemed like a pretty cool guy.
Losing hope.
>>45631Nevrer lose hope!
>>45963But no drawfags are interested.
>>45973d'aww, messy scarlet :3
A little fan pic quickie try
>>45999 Who is this!
>>46016Arnold Schwarzenegger or Kat from Sequential Art? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequential_Art_%28webcomic%29The artist chose to remain anonymous.
>>46022More the artist. Everyone knows who the former is.
We need more jolly
>>45487Douche at the top, douche at the bottom.
Needs more Hilary
MOAR!
EVEN MOAR!!!
Where the heck did Jolly go? he's dissapeared off the face of the earth if the internet has anything to say
>>46913"I'm afraid that I've a couple of projects that need my full attention, so there won't be another update for about a week and a half."It's right there on http://www.collectedcurios.com
Wait, so that pic was canon? awesomeface.jpg
>>47404Now that all the squirrels are free of their pod-thingies, I'd like an image where they decide to "link up" to exchange information... among other things...
>>47404Jack's letting his growth fetish leak into SA. Don't do it Jack!
>>44355Any chances for uncensored version?
>>47404 Kat'll sneak a bite and end up walking around teh house with chloe sized attributes and causeing nosebleeds from all sides
>>47429Or it could make her a giant and cause a mass panic.
>>47426There is none. It was a teaser by Jack.
>>47432the blur looks hardly random...
We needed more Scarlet.
>>47436I thought about that and tried a few things on shop but it's too far gone. However, unless Jack stretched out one panel over the entire comic, it's likely unrelated due to lack of repeating marks for each panel. Not to mention it's fairly obvious that he placed everything above the blur line to tease.>>47473Awesome! It suits her.
>>47473Yikes. Who drew that? Could they do some Chloe or Vanity? (hint hint)
>>47473Jahamahbahdahlahyah! Hot.
>>47473urghhh, cannot unsee.
>>47535Is. Is that... good or bad?
>>47537 Bad
>>47558Oh well, can't win em all.
And now her ears are quite literally fuckable.
Mystery: Pip's a horndog and likes "moist squirrel girls," but we never see his (no doubt failed) attempts to bonk 'em.
>>47646Pip's a weird one about that. He was supportive of Scarlet staying until Kat said she'd be given clothes and he even tried to auction her to a pervert. Yet he doesn't take any real interest in Scarlet at all. Maybe she's just not his type.
>>47652He likes 'em human, as shown by his online "conquests".
>>47628
Offtopic:JJ apparently started drawing "furry" stuff, then moved into "anthro" category...http://us.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Phillip-M-Jackson/Jolly%20Art/index01-by-date.html
>>47912Is that...A fursona?!
>>47912>JJ apparently started drawing "furry" stuff, then moved into "furry" category...
>>47915I cat believe it! This is otter nonsense!Puns for both possibilities of whatever the hell that animal is.
>>47915>2003.04.01It was a six years ago, he grew out of it... maybe.
>>47945I hope.In the meantime: creamed Kat.
>>47996In some ways I get the feeling she's got a fetist for being came over from how she's reacting to that..
>>47996Seeing as Art in the comic is fully human, it seems Jack has gotten over it, and now views furries the way the rest of us do; an interesting departure from the norm, as opposed to a 'way of life'.
>>48030And a way to make money
>>48050This is what propably JJ think about "furries".
To bad these pics aren't more... you know...finished
>>48102 Yo do know they're meant to be simple sketches not fully cleaned up pics, so they're actually pretty well made for sketches.
>>48098oh God...
>>48243.....well played.
Jack released a massive sketchbook with some unseen SA stuff on it.Downside is it's paperback instead of download. Meaning higher cost, a wait for mailage and having a book full of fur art lying around for anyone to find.
>>48257If you have to worry about people finding things, you aren't hiding them well enough.
>>48272I'm more worried about having to scan all of it page by page.
This thread needs a boost
And another
>>47912
I suppose
>>43702BumpJJ had watched Bubblegum Crisis or something...?
>>48708Whoa, hostile.>>48960Marvel is now fuming because they think someone's leaked their big surprise miniseries for 2010: "Iron Squirrel Girl."...So the robot was a hollow shell? 'Cuz you'd think the outer armor would be the last thing to go on...
>>48964He certainly knows how to entice.
This thread is in serious needs of epic bumping
bumping, for the sake of lazy noobs.
A bump sweetened with a little shop I made.
>>50092 Don't get it. Doesn't make as much sense as the original implied masterbating pip joke.
>>50111Masturbating Scarlet joke. PAY ATTENTION!
>>50112My fist instinct was that she doesn't wash up after going to the toilet.
>>50113Mine too.Of course we are not thinking about anal fisting, aren't we?
bumped for great justice
bump with some pics
1/2
2/2
Think that's it.
FUUUUUHHHHK ME RUNNIN'.This is JJ's not-all-that-secret: he mixes Hot Sexy and DAWWWW and LOL and Sweetness in just the right amounts....As long as you don't think about it too long (cat sweat).
>>56788Fake. the gun is a candy dispener in the real strip.
>>56792Did you figure that one out by yourself or did you have help?
Just to let you know, there was a censored pic of the black cat, Kat (Think it was her), and what appeared to be Art engaged in some pussy licking fun, and it was posted on /co/ yesterday.The reason I wasn't too sure on who it was was because it had fucking post it censors all over it. Happy lurkings and hopeful deliverance.
>>57679Kat is brown. I believe.
>>57679It's on the other thread.>>54680
>>57679Black cat's name is Vanity Thorn.
>>57679 Y'know, he might not actually uncensor these pics for some reason...
>>57821Yeah, he is known to troll his viewers from time to time.
RAISE FROM THE GRAVE
This is nothing but a bunch of viruseshttp://www.megaupload.com/?d=VRSDXEYL
I am now getting an idea for a screenplay in my head, a kind of global cinematic troll if you will. It is live-action, save for one character who is CGI. The story is basically that of "Escape From The Planet Of The Apes," only it's a comedy, and instead of Roddy McDowell stumbling out of the spacecraft, it's Chloe Sinclaire, and instead of a government worried about a monkey uprising, this time almost everyone from the human main character's girlfriend to fursuiters to 4chan to the Vatican wants Chloe eliminated, simply because her real-life existence (within the movie) and unashamed sexuality makes them (and hopefully the audience) uncomfortable.
>>60577 so why post a link then?
>>60588Sounds just pretentious enough to work!
Needs bump
>>60780Oh my dear God. OH MY DEAR GOD.>>60588If it indeed aimed arrows at everybody on every side, I would watch it.
>>60781 An equal offender Chloe cartoon?
>>60588The movie would probably be bad, but the reaction would be the most hilarious thing ever.
>>61083 Which is why a movie like that would be stupid.If it was like a chloe miniseries of like 3 cartoons that would be dandy.
I dunno. I've seen movies that wear the "I'm politically incorrect, but you're just stupid" chip on their shoulder for an hour and a half. Sometimes it can work ("South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut), but usually it sucks royally ("PCU"). This could be different, as everybody attaches themselves to this newest worldwide celebrity sensation, only to turn on her like a snake when she does something that reveals the gap between rhetoric and reality. (For example, Chloe would probably find wearing something else's fur to be revolting, so PETA assumes they have a new spokesperson, but she thinks they're mostly crackpots and doesn't hesitate to say so out loud. Time for paint throwing and car bombs! But the Big Shit doesn't hit the fan until she goes on some "View"-style show and deep-kisses one of the hosts live on camera.) She wouldn't be some "Chauncey Gardiner" type simpleton, but wouldn't necessarily be smugly judgmental either; she tries to get along but throws the entire planet into chaos simply by being who she is in a world that can't handle her.Like "Splice," but without the secrecy and gore.It's all pipe dream, because I don't think JJ would ever go for it, but how would you end it? You'd have to contrive some means for her to "go back where she came from" because she'd never be safe here. Giantess rampage? (This is a Jolly Jack character after all.) Interdimensional rescue-retrieval mission from the homeworld? Tropical island? Jungle goddess? I think I like legendary jungle goddess. High volunteer rate for the sacrifices...
>>61088 I don't think Jolly would go for that for the simple fact he's already got a background for her being that she owns a bigass company and lives on a chain of islands.
>>61090What's this? Is JJ actually learning to draw vaginas properly?
>>61116But she's easily bored and likes adventure. And none of her wealth would matter in another dimension. But I don't think Jolly's too fond of Hollywood anyway. In the end, they'd probably have the character rewritten more like Scarlet and make everything "wacky." You know. "Planet 51."Hollywood will make "Howard the Duck." But they won't make something like this.
>>61120 Howard the duck was aweful. Chloe would have so much more style.
>>60577I call bluff and i was right :DGet your collection of jolly jack comic's/pic set here~
>>61232heerrrrrreeee?
Errh...to lazy to follow the link some peoplehttp://www.megaupload.com/?d=VRSDXEYLand no it's not a bunch of viruses
>>61244Aw. I wanted viruses.
>>61244 Why's it got the weird name?
>>61391cus he was trying to joke about, do i need to upload a shot of the content if your scared?
>>61423Actually, you're not allowed to post Jolly Jack's pay-for content here. I used to do it on Sundays (and Fred Perry on Fridays), but then got warned off. There was a huge sticky about it and everything.
>>61452 regardless, let's keep bumps going.
tiny head fail
>>61608Because proportions are universal regardless of scale, especially in cartoons.
>>61608 not really when you account the body's muscles get bigger in mass as a person builds up strength, but the head doesn't have the same kinds of muscles, therefore stays the same size.
>>61614The rest of her bone structure has extended and thickened somewhat to accomodate her massive musculature, but her skull has been rather left behind. It's a slightly uncommon mixture of regular size increase and hyper bodybuilder bulk-up and it's unsurprising it catches people used to more ordinary giant/giantess imagery off-guard and seems strange.
>>61608Tell it to the Hulk.
>>61609Proportions are not "universal", but are pretty much the same for most humans. Perception of proportion is an adaptative feature that allows individuals to choose appropiate partners. It's all in the brain. Beyond that threshold, "too small" or "too big" start looking "wrong".I used to ink and color drawings from a female artist who liked to draw strong and muscular girls, and our work often got criticized by people who said it looked "fat", "unsexy" or "manly". I didn't understand it, but it makes sense from an evolutionary point of view.Different tastes for different brains, I guess.
he draws fuckin pinheads. do not want. untalented hack.
>>61904Heh. Well, you're entitled to your completely idiotic opinion. No one's required to care.
>>61904Agreed. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a pathetic retard.
ITT the proportions of giant cat women are SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESS
>>61904 >>61937She's a 'hulk' type superhero. That means that her body structure is larger then her head. There's even a character with normal proportions right next to her on the same pic, so it's an intentional design. In anycase, here's some new art.
Still on the fence about how he draws boobs.
>>61961I like 'em alright, but I have kinda low standards.
>>61962My standards are a bit higher than what would probably be normal, personally.I blame Satoshi Urushihara.
>>61961 I love dem perky nips, especially these ones.
>>61966he makes the nub part too big to me
>>61961 whu-pow indeed.
>>61963I blame Satoshi Urushihara for giving me a SHINY BITCHES fetish.Best fetish ever.
>>62454 That is adorable.
>>62454 kats neck looks a little wide
>>62460It's disgusting in every way
>>62482Hmmmwhat now?
>>43702..."Juggernaut"...?
It's the Juggernaut, Butch!
>>43702Damn furfag...
>>64309OH, THANKS A LOT.My testicles exploded with so much force my lower extremities are gone and there's blood everywhere and now the FBI's pounding on my do
>>64366 how dare they?
Oh really? This just got more fanservicy than before
>>64655FFFFFUUUWHAAAAAAAAAA
>>64655I think we've gone from flashback to lucid dreaming at this point.
Delicious Hate Sex commencing in 5..4..3..2..
>>64702AND THEN SHE WAKES UP!
>>64704sadly - she is
>>64997FUCK SHIT FUCK SHIT FUCK FUCK SHIT
>>65022 fuck that, shows JJ has SOME integrity not to let everything go to porn
Saw it coming from the very start, you guys should have knew this was going to happen.
>>65088GOOD FOR YOU, MA'AM.You can see a buzzsaw coming towards your skull. Doesn't mean it won't hurt when it digs in.
>>65085>shows JJ has SOME integrity not to let everything go to pornYeah... as if most of us give a shit. We want boobies.
SA has fanservice, but isn't a fap-strip, so sure, we all knew it was going to cop out rather than go hardcore. It still make Mongo's dick all crazy. JJ's probably reading this and laughing, I TROLL UUUUUUUUUIt wasn't integrity, it was a deliberate act of penile provocation.
>>65102 That's why he draws Chloe.
>>65085>SOME integrityYou kidding? He's got a special secret page for his best buds where he's got no problem shedding off that supposed shred of integrity
>>65085>integrityAnd in completely unrelated news, JJ has just released another comic where the girl transforms into some tentacle monster and starts fucking herself in the new holes she just grew.
>>65168Nothing new, then?
>>65168Whoa! I'd buy THAT for a dollar!!Look, he understands his audience.
>>65142Fuck sake. Doesn't he know he'd get big bucks uf he let everyone buy hot Kat sexings?
>>65258You take Kat, I'd like more Scarlet in pics like this.
>>65260 screw that. Needs more vanity action
>>65315Vanity's a bitch. Of course, if she's being raped, I'd be a bit more open to the idea.
>>65462 don'tcha mean hilary?
>>65472...Oh, snap. Indeed I do. Vanity's the hot goth with the nerdy friends, right?
>>65487Aye.>>65260There's a better version (the straying hand is better defined) but I can't post it because it's dinged as a dupe.
>>65489Open it in paint, change a pixel, save, upload.
>>65489You mean this?I actually edited this one from the original a few days ago, since I lost the one that was posted first; after finishing, I decided to edit other pics of Miss Scarlet as well, but anyway, here it is.Amusing how a few lines can change the whole concept of a piece of work.
>>65516No, it's not that version either.Oh, HERE's the problem. Posted on another thread, that's why.https://plus4chan.org/boards/pco/res/56169.html#57127
>>65537I know it's not, as I said in my last post, I made this edit since I believed the first version was lost and I didn't share it until now.It seems in your version the right hand has the right details, contrary to what I did as it's considered a quick edit. Kudos on that, good sir.
>>65537The hand is debatable, since Scarlet does have little 'tuff' lines where the light and dark fur meet. Also doubt Phil would erase the hand but use the thumb for said lines in inking.That little drip was there though, if you crank up the Levels enough.
>>65142 Geez if he's got some super secret site for his best buds only, why the hell does he cocktease everyone else by parading it around for anyone who can type in an url?
>>65545Wasn't trying to knock you, just wanted to offer an alt version I'd found. Perhaps I misunderstood your earlier post.>>66273I can live with SPECTER being off-limits to the general public. First, the stuff WILL eventually find its way to us. The hunt can be as much fun as the having. Second, if that's what it takes to avoid some LLToon-style DU-RAMA!!!!!1, it is a small price indeed, one I will gladly pay.
>>66356Thing is, he doesn't advertise the section at all. I'd email him to enquire about rates, if i weren't worried that it would scare him into hiding the Spector stuff even more.In anycase, I highly doubt the SA pics are uncensored. Someone would of shared them by now.
>>66356Thing is, the stuff hasn't. He's only posted like 3 of them on some other website and then someone leaked a pic of kat taking censored dickings. and then no more were shown..>>66359Same for this. He's probably got tons of sa stuff on there so why noone's hacked or shared it is odd considering they do the same for the apsara
bump alive this magical thread
Bump with a tease
Bump. Anyone got the specter stuff yet?
>>67288It's forbidden here.
>>67577shame. Any ideas where they might be? I'd loev to see a rip of them
Bumping with Naughty Cheetah.
needs more bump before all the pictures are used.
omegabump
This thread must never die!
>>69892Would help if the actual comic updated more often. Guy could at least submit more sketchbook art, so we can finally get to the Scarlet pics.
>>69898
Sweet
What is this?
>>70054a squirrel with tits?
what does /pco/ think of Jolly Jack's actual porn character, Chloe?
>>70192It stinks.
>>70207
>>70192 truthfully, her nympho personality is just annoying nowshe has a nice pic anow and then though
>>70192Eh.She's hot.I guess.
>>70192Goddess Tier. ...Although I tend to enjoy her softcore and mainstream stuff to the hardcore.
>>70192Chloe? Probably the sexiest anthro out there, ZigZag not counting.
>>70269 Zigzag is even MORE annoying than Chloe
>>70280Zigzag is Meh Tier. She's not exceptionally attractive and her constant antics and sex puns get boring after a while.
>>70293 let's put it this way: zigzag is and always was fap material and for that she does it well. chloe is also fap/pinup material so its mission accomplished there. They're there to whack off over
bump for more fappage
I mean really bumpage. of a sparkling kind
I'd love to request a pic but I don't think the current artist draw furs. Not to mention they got enough on their plate with the request thread.
>>71416Correction, 'Artists'.Also I wonder if Fred Perry would do SA on commission. His style matches quite nicely but I worry he'd have something against drawing porn of other people's characters when without conscent, Which would be understandable.
>>43702A new Apsara in on-line.http://www.collectedcurios.com/apsara
>>71638Such a small, small head.
>>71665but the head doesn't have any muscle in it, hence it doesnt have to enlarge with the rest of the body
>>71678This is a stupid argument to explain away bad anatomy.<-- This is what a large body looks like. Notice the size of his head in relation to his body. Also, if "it's magic, I ain't gotta explain shit" then the head can grow too.
>>71682Jesus christ Andre was a fucking beast.
>>71665Yes, yes, mission accomplished, you can run along now.There was some guy on dA--good artist, but an obsessive dork--who kept pitching rant after rant about this in spite of the fact that almost no one else on the face of the planet gives a shit. You wouldn't happen to be that individual, would you? (Tip: When *normal* people don't like an art style, they move on to one they like. Unless it's hilarious, like Liefeld.)O NOEZ STIMPY'S PROPORTIONS ARE UNREALISTICK!! MEGAR-FAIL!! PANTZ POOPD!!
>>71685See>>71682Also, cry moar.
>>71687You're missing the point; he's not saying that it's anatomically correct, he's saying that it doesn't matter. It's a comic about an humanoid catwoman who spontaneously enlarges and has sex with a man. Realism is not an issue here. You may not enjoy the visuals, but harping on it repeatedly is pointless. JJ knows that the heads on most of his giant women are disproportionately small. It's not because he doesn't understand anatomy, it's because he makes the conscious decision to draw them that way.
>>71697>BAWWWWW YOU INSULTD MAH FURRY ARTIST
>>71687>>71723Uh-huh. Everyone else is crying. Not you.Laughable troll is laughable.
>>71697And it looks stupid.
I smell either Jackie-boy or one of the buttbuddy artists that was defending his tantrums over this over on DA.It's always somewhere between hilarious and sad to see otherwise semi-decent artists suddenly bust out with the "You can't criticize unless you can do better! Plus it's his styyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyle!" bullshit that any whiny thirteen-year-old posting her map pencil colored Snape yaoi pictures uses.In summary: Jolly Jack has a shrunken head fetish.
>>71838>You can't criticize unless you can do better!No one said that.I don't see why this bothers you so much. It only shows up in a handful of his art.
>>71840>I don't see why this bothers you so muchPerhaps he has a small head?
That catgirl can fit her own head in a single hand, to many, that's Liefeld-laughable level. Then again, Liefeld has more success than any of us will ever have.
>>71972Speaking of teh Rob! Can someone explain me why people act like Rob is such a bad thing but when it comes to this other Korean guy, doing the same thing is great?
...or this...It's been years and I don't understand why Rob is thumbs down while HTK is thumbs up.
>>71972>>71974>>71973I know you're going to maintain this Dipshit Troll Mode of yours until everyone gets tired of replying to you, and then you win, but at least stay marginally on topic.
>>71976Actually, I'm a different anon here. Sorry if you mistook me with some hater troll.I'm okay with JJ's stuff, not exactly my thing but I'm cool with it. I'm not on the haters side, because haters gonna hate and hate is pointless... THEN I saw people's been mentioning His Holiness ROB! and that's what got me into the thread.I realize I may be missing some stuff here but... Seriously guys, what's up with that double standards? Why is OK to hate Rob?
>>71978 because of monstrosities like this...Seriously, jollyack's style and tiny head catwomens is god like compared to attached image
>>71986"it's his style", "it's intended to look like that" and "it's not real" arguments apply, I fear.
>>71978Jim Lee was a big artist in the 90's and upon entering the 2000's he adapted with changing tastes in style and is one of the better artists of this time.Liefeld... hasn't. His work is the perfect example of what the 90's were. He's a nice guy that really does regret that Cap pic and is getting a bum rap. Unfortunately, he hasn't adapted himself so he hasn't really redeemed himself. So all his recent work just looks like outdated stuff from the 90's.However, that Korean artist (magna carta guy I presume) is mixing anime and elongated torsos but with smoother transitions and lines. So he's like Rob 2.0-san.As for Jolly Jack, it's just his fetish. He likes tentacles, anthros, muscle girls, giant girls, transformation. He mixes a cartoony comic style and that doesn't necessarily call for complete attention to proper physics (see Chloe's balloon breasts).It looks good to him, it looks good to his legion of fans, but it's not guaranteed to win everyone over.
>>71987You're applying the same standards to "cartoony anthro" as "take-me-seriously-please anatomy-study superhero comics"? Really?How tiny is YOUR head?
>>71986Look at bottom-right panel.
What the fuck? I'm just saying she has a tiny head.
I don't even like JJ's random characters and growth fetish. I just want SA stuff.
>>72023I like a healthy debate. That's what I don't like on /pco/, we can't argue on here or else a mod will just delete posts.It's healthy, dammit! I know it derails a thread but it happens all the time on /co/ and when it's not bombarded by trolls (like when isn't it ever, amirite?), they can be good arguments. This one didn't get out of hand and I hope the mods don't erase any of it.Now this is my last post on this topic, good day gentlemen.
>>71840>>No one said that. They did by the pantsload on his DA. Which is what I was referencing.Prepare for a shock... there is more to the internet than plus4chan.But yes, other artists like Linno were coming out of the woodwork to defend JJ with those exact arguments. Stuff like "So someone with no submissions thinks he can criticize Jack, huh?" And Jack himself obviously isn't above such things, as he used similar arguments himself in his various "How daaaaare you?!" comeback comics.The fact that the thread has wandered into comparing professional artists that also have anatomy issues says that the specter of those arguments is lurking, even if it hasn't been made in those words. Rob Liefeld claiming his "style" and being bad and famous does not excuse Jolly Jack of the same sin, especially since the thing he's most famous for is having most of the furry fandom's more extreme fetishes.Now, he makes some good art on occasion, very true. But the man himself is a jackass, leaning constantly on his fetishes and his gimmicks, all of which were cute the first few times but have become the equivalent of a commercial theme tune that was amusing the first two times you've heard it and has now been being replayed for five years and you want to do someone a violence every time you hear it.
>>72049>They did by the pantsload on his DA. Which is what I was referencing.>Prepare for a shock... there is more to the internet than plus4chan.The context of your statement implied that you were talking about people in this thread, especially because you did not say anything about those other people.>The fact that the thread has wandered into comparing professional artists that also have anatomy issues says that the specter of those arguments is lurking, even if it hasn't been made in those words. Rob Liefeld claiming his "style" and being bad and famous does not excuse Jolly Jack of the same sin, especially since the thing he's most famous for is having most of the furry fandom's more extreme fetishes.Wait, what? That's not what I saw happening. I thought we were pointing at Liefeld and saying, "Now that's terrible anatomy." Rob's art looks that way because he's a lazy artist who can't draw proper bodies and has no sense of perspective. Jack's art looks that way because he has some peculiar tastes.Criticizing Rob Liefeld's art for being inaccurately proportioned: pointing out flaws in his attempt to draw realistic human beings.Criticizing Jolly Jack's art for being inaccurately proportioned: complaining that it appeals to his fetishes instead of yours.
>>72049>Prepare for a shock... there is more to the internet than plus4chan. I love how you can't even express yourself coherently, yet you still maintain an air of smug arrogant asshole about you at all times.>But the man himself is a jackassAh, now it's a personality issue. Thank God you're no jackass!See, people laugh at Liefeld's stuff because the style is completely unconnected to the anatomy fuckuppery. JJ's small-head thing is a deliberate decision. You grasp that much, at least--the problem is, you can't say you don't like it, and then move on to greener pastures. No, you have to keep yammering on about it, and now you're starting to cry because no one else is drinking your Kool-Aid.No matter how often you pop up and pitch a fit (whether it's here or at dA), he's still going to get more commissions than you. Feels bad, I know.
>>72023Pffft hahaha
>>72081>>people laugh at Liefeld's stuff because the style is completely unconnected to the anatomy fuckupperyThen people should laugh at Mogudan >>72021 instead of praising him. Which they do. Regularly.So we may be ignoring some variable of this equation...
>>72139What JJ thinks about this.
>>72148Had to do it.He's british and has an ego, you'd never be able to change his mind. I think his reaction comics are pretty pathetic to be honest. Like a rapper who does a diss song because some celebrity said they don't like their music.
>>72139>Then people should laugh at Mogudan instead of praising him. Which they do.So, to summarize:People laugh at Liefeld because his errors are unintentional. People laugh at Mogudan because his errors are unintentional.And there is an incongruity there somewhere.
>>72153he's Australian but lives in the Uk. Hes mentioned it a few times before somewhere.
>>72066>>Criticizing Jolly Jack's art for being inaccurately proportioned: complaining that it appeals to his fetishes instead of yours.So you're admitting that he has a fetish for shrunken heads. That he faps to women with tiny skulls.Oh, also:>>72081>>No matter how often you pop up and pitch a fit (whether it's here or at dA), he's still going to get more commissions than you. Feels bad, I know.Look, now someone's made the argument. Right here in this thread. And thrown a "You're just jealous" on top of it, too.
>>72164I never said otherwise. It's not worth getting all worked up over.Though if we're going to split hairs I'd say that it's not the exact size of the head that matters rather than how large the body is in comparison. JJ obviously finds superhumanly strong women erotic, and the "large body, small head" character design is a classic way of conveying raw physical power (see: the Hulk). I don't think that a normal woman with a shrunken head would do anything for him besides maybe make him laugh.
>>72154Actually people don't laugh at Mogudan. They say he's great, an awesome artist... they call him "Mogudan-sama" and all the usual praise.You don't see Liefeld appreciation threads but a quick google search shows lots of Mogudan threads in forums.This, I don't understand.
>>Female's necks aren't that thick, even in bodybuilders.True or False?
>>72218that's circumstantial, isn't it?
>>72167I believe you meant "lazy way", not "classic way".
>>72224That does it, I'm abandoning all attempts to have a rational debate with you. I tried to be civil and present my points in a collected and well-thought-out manner, but you always responded with snide little remarks like this one. You've done nothing to support your argument beyond, "I don't like this," and, "Some people who disagree with me are jerks." It's all OPINIONS OPINIONS OPINIONS and no one's going to win because no one will convince you that small heads aren't terribad and you won't convince anyone that they are. Nothing good will come of this thread as long as the argument continues, so I'm doing my part by dropping out of it.
Seriously Gentlemen, Are you going to flood this thread with unnecessary drama instead of related content? I'm dissapointed...
>>72229>this thread
>>72301>avoiding answering the question>saging to try and hide his humiliationHA HA HA HA HAOH WOWI'll accept that as your answer-slash-concession.Never in all my years have I seen such miserable failure.
Andre the giant was a beast, but I wouldn't put an acromegalic as an example of anatomy either. Read about his drinking, it was epic. Here, I have a new twist to this debate, bigger heads are a mammalian signature for juveniles, ergo all those who want bigger heads are pedos. Haha!
>that neckOh god.
I insist, if this is cool, if Mogudan is cool, then Liefeld is cool huh.Seriously, Liefeld is great with narrative and his style is as personal as anyone else's . It'd be incredible if he did porn too.Look, Liefeld's a visionary, he even knows how the Apocalypse will look like:http://armageddonnow.net/creators/
I caught some photos of the Tome on JJ's forum. I'd really buy it, if it were a digital release.
>>72526it probably would be if enough people asked for it.
>>72527I have done but i think JJ will keep to print. Less chance of someone uploading it somewhere for free.
>>72529You know someone's going to buy and scan it. Being in print will stop nothing. He's kidding himself if thinks that will stop anything.
>>72531Well it's been months now and no such luck.
>>72535Months? More like years.The book itself can be released, but someone must be brave enough to scan every page from that humongous phone directory.
>>72562i dont see why noone can share the tome. it just takes some care to do soanyway, its not like anyone had a problems with sharing his other stuff.
>>72643It's most likely that the people who normally share, didn't get it because it's more expensive, has no porn in it and they're probably worried about a physical book of furry art being found by friends and family.
>>72562bumping with hot Kat' ass.
>>73008 DAT ASS
>>73008 why does the panel make me get the feeling this is a minipanel to something bigger?
>>73014Jay Naylor style adult sidestories for SA characters? Finally something we want to see!
>>73015 probably wouldn't be that but we can dream.
bumpage
>>73008I'm in love...
Ohhhhhhhhh....
>>73091Someone posted these sketches. I wonder if he inked the other ones.
>>73098Holy Mary Mother of Joseph, please tell me there's a bigger version. Even if it's just a sketch.
>>73148Not original, but restored.Don't ask who am I, just enjoy it.
>>73098>>73154Where are Scarlet and Pip? Pip is probably masturbating, but what about Scarlet? She and other squirrels from Quentin lab would make a marvelous lesbian orgy.
>>73157Scarlet was apparently made a sacred innocent character for JJ, at some point after pics like >>65260 and i assume the other sexual pics of her.It does seem like all the cheesecake-y Scarlet pics have '2006' stamped on them. I just hope that her growth as a character will make JJ reconsider.
>>73154 how'd you restore it like that?
Ga bump
>>43702Some suggestive stuff in 3...2...1...
>>733120.50... 0.25... ?
>>73312not an actual SA comic
>>73284 whoa. Where this image came from? Keeping an eye on JJ's deviantart profile and site, but never saw this one.
>>73467Nope, it's fresh off his dA site. Posted two days ago.
bumpage!
Daily bump
BumpThis thread needs moar of it
Postin a Kat comic.
>>74402
>>74403
>>74404
>>74405
>>74406
>>74407
>>74408
>>74410
>>74411
>>74412
>>74413
>>74414
>>74415
>>74416
>>74417
>>74418
>>74419
>>74420
>>74421
>>74422
>>74423
>>74424
>>74426
Bump
Thoughts?
>>75080Perfect.
>>75080GO MY OD
>>75080As they would say in Italy, he's filling his Lasagne!
Plethora of Pinups 5? WANT.Will return with 1-4 if needs are met.
>>75794While I don't mind his exaggerated proportions, it's good to see that he can still draw relatively vanilla stuff.
>>75795Links and posts of his Aspara work will be deleted by mods.
MOAR!!!! This guy has been one of my favorite artists for a long time. If I wasn't living off of 50 dollars a week I would be buying his stuff like mad.
>>75938Aw, someone's anus is still all achey over the whole "tiny head" thing.
>>76017...You? Seriously, don't fucking start (again). And come to realize that "laughing at trolls" =/= "butthurt."
>>76019>>...You? no u
>>75938 While her head may be small compared to her body it isn't small compared to the need of her brain. If your head grows proportionately to that body your brain ends up floating around in a jar of brain juice getting banged against your skull every time you turn your head. On the other hand if her brain grows is size to much but not complexity she loses functionality and becomes the new Scarlet. So overall, I think it's a good balance of the two extremes.
>>76023Your conclusion has no basis in scientific reason.Look at any large animal, the size of their brain, and their relative intelligence. JJ's HUEG girls should be drooling idiots.
>>76073why do people insist on bringing scientific reason into things like thisin situations like this your argument carries more weight if you simply point out that such pinheaded creatures look bizarre and sometimes even ugly despite being an attempt at erotica
J Scott Campbell's girls don't have digestive systems. So what?