plus4chan
ImageboardsRadio
Site Theme...
imageboards
Main FAQ [ baw ] [ co / cog / jam / mtv / tek ] [ ck / coc / draw / writ ] [ pco / coq ] [ a / op / pkmn ] [ n ]
Avatar
Links:Avatar.WikiaGaang Jr. WikiIroh Screencaps

 Posting a reply to post #57168
Name
Email
Subject  
Message
File 
Embed  
Password  


File: 124151085985.png-(480.45KB, 640x480, azulafeet.png)
57168 No.57168
You are now imagining how awesome Azula would be in the sack.

34 posts omitted. Last shown. Expand all images
No.57637
>>57635
But you are the one who's sexualizing it.

No.57638
>>57637

Not to add to the argument between you two, but when viewing someone holding something long and cylindrical, like a brush, between their toes at that angle, the leap to sexualization doesn't seem that far, foot fetish or not.

I mean, the one Suki picture, yeah sure, that's just her relaxing on the beach. But that whole Azula foot scene in the finale was almost dripping with domination/subjection overtones.

And as I said, we all know what that brush between her toes damn well looks like. xD

No.57639
>>57638

...a brush.

Cylinder does not always equal phallus. especially something like a brush which ends in something entirely different from what a penis looks like. COME ON.

That said, I am firm in the belief that you all want to fuck your mothers. FREUD UP IN THIS BITCH.

No.57640
>>57639

I see it quite clearly. I'm not thinking the square part in the back is where it ends though. Instead, I look at that as the beginning. In which case if you view it as coming towards you, the shape looks quite phallic indeed. Cylindrical and rounded on the end.

All this being Freudian territory I think not. I happen to have a foot fetish, I happen to enjoy Avatar, people with foot fetishes are often submissive, and Azula, one of the most dominating characters in the show just happens to have a scene where she's basically getting a pedicure.

No.57641
>>57640

I am saying when you, as a foot fetishist see feet, you sexualize it. Yes, and thats cool, do whatever, in fact good on you for being frank about it.

What I am saying is, as an artfag (and not just some douche who draws things good, I have training and knowledge of theory/history and all that jazz) that you as the viewer are perceiving and sexualizing a rather simple act of a power mad little girl. It was not the storyboard artist's intention for it to be sexy. It was not the voice actor's intention for it to be sexy. It was not the writer's intention for it to be sexy.

There is solid, well taught theory explaining away everything you find sexy about this to being completely mundane. I do not want to write an essay as to every detail WHY. I haven't slept for over 24 hours, you do not want me to write an essay explaining it either as it would effectively ruin your fun. The last thing I want to do is ruin your fun.

It is you, you sick fuck. You can be as sick a fuck as you like, just stop projecting so hard. I understand you want to believe there are other sick fucks like you, and there are, trust there are plenty. But we are not all sick fucks, some of us make a cartoon or see a cartoon without seeing it as anything but a goddamn cartoon and we LIKE IT THAT WAY.

Furthermore, spotting a phallus right off the bat and domination/control themes are pretty Fruedian if you ask me.

You need to realize, as a sick fuck, you see these things instantly. The general populace does not. Do not force your thoughts upon them, as they are perfectly happy experiancing whatever it may be without the perversions.

Finally, be proud of what a sick fuck you are. You get something out of this scene, and see it in a unique way that the rest of the viewers don't, and thats pretty fucking awesome. Be smug in your sickness, you're one of an elite few that takes hold of the full potential of the scene, share a polite nod to the other sick fucks around the room, and enjoy the show, no one the wiser.

Sorry if I rambled, again haven't slept in ages.

Tl;dr: You are a sick fuck, we are not sick fucks, diversity is awesome, be proud, stay true, treat it like its your own private gentlemen's club where only the cool sickos like you (and Freud?) are invited.

No.57642
>>57639
Pretty sure you want to sex your mom Mayekoi

But before you do get some shuteye

No.57644
>>57641
wat

No.57646
How did such a ridiculous thread become so serious all of the sudden?

No.57647
>>57641
Freud was very imaginative.

No.57650
>>57641

Wow. That was quite thought out and informative. But I have one question. Do you take requests? I ask because I'd love to see you do one about what kind of person would take the time to write a piece so vehemently passionate about something so silly and random. Putting someone in there place is one thing. Informing someone delusional about their own false projections in life is another. But that right there...that right there that you did...that was something else. If strong you're enough to use that powerful magnifying glass on yourself, and if you can resist the temptations and stay objective, I'd be very interested to see you step out of your own shoes, become a third party, and tell us what you see.

No.57658
>>57657

>>57650 here. At the end of the day, maturity and ability in regards to expression and interpretation is subjective.

I just was a bit put off by the fact that an entire thread was going on, whoever started it, foot fetish or not, obviously saw the brush as a phallus, hence the "how awesome Azula would be in the sack" line, several other people saw the phallus and got the reference as well, laughs, jokes, and fun times were going on, and then someone feels the need to come along and not only suck all the fun out of the room and go all serious bzns, but accuse everyone of wanting to diddle mummy dearest on top of it all. The first post of Mayekoi was in response to something that ended with an "xD"
>>57638
Is it really necessary to take something with an "xD" so seriously?

Didn't seem like much "maturity" was being exhibited.

To your point though, "diction" as you put it, is subjective as well. So perhaps I was reading too far into things myself, but where you saw silly and random, I saw somewhat rude. Stepping back, if I must factor tiredness and exhaustion into it, I can see that both of us probably went over some nonexistent line. Lol.

No.57659
>>57641
MAYEKOI

SLEEP

(AND POST SOME MORE GAANG JR PAGES)

No.57674
All these peoples arguing over psychology and philosophy hurts my head. Can't I just like Azula's feets and hope for feet art in peace? T_T

lol

No.57679
lulz that ep and part were just on nick toons.

No.57770
>>57635

I'll have to agree with a few others. I see how sexualizing that can come so easy.

No.58037
>>57615

You should really write some moar to that.

No.65899
>>57634

The whole thing was entirely pointless. They could have just skipped right to the mirror scene, and yet this whole bit has nothing but sub and dom undertones with foot worship to boot.

What more do you want for proof or evidence? The director's mouth words?

Either way, having a foot fetish doesn't make you a freak, and it's not a modern fetish either. Learn some sex history, kid.

No.65907
>>65899
You're joking. It's setting up the start of her mental decline, hardly a superfluous moment. And of *course* there'd be elements of domination and submission, they're servants and she's freaking royalty.

No.65934
>>65907
Exactly. This is the first time we get to her paranoia coming to the surface. If this scene wasn't in the show, it would just cut from her scene with Ozai to her suddenly banishing all her Dai Li and asking them to "send in the next group on you're way out"

How would that have made a lick of sense without this scene coming first?

No.65936
>>65899
>>65907

I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle. The scene was necessary in addition to the other few scenes that show her deteriorating mental state, and obviously there will be domination subjection issues at hand when showing a bossy princess with her meek servants, but at the same time, if you just showed the single scene specifically in and of itself to people, I think it's safe to venture that more than one of them would see elements of foot fetishism there.

No.66058
>>65936
i think it's pretty clear that at least one person with a foot fetish worked it into the show

most barefoot characters don't flaunt it the way toph does

No.66064
>>66058

Perhaps, but it could be also said that her dirty bare feet (not even counting the fact that she's an earth bender) are constantly shown to show what a laid back and untamed wild child tomboy she is.

To be fair though, there is indeed quite a bit of foot focus in the show across multiple characters, most shown in this thread.

No.66115
I think some feet are cute or even sexy but it's not like I fap to them. I don't find the thought of somebody working on the show feeling the same so creepy.

No.70423
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5460717/1/The_Involuntary_Bender

Ah, can't believe I was able to dig this up. But anyway, I was reading this today and thought of this thread from way back when. If Azula dominating with her feet is your thing (and what a very particular thing to have) then this little one shot actually has a fairly kinky part you'll probably like. I myself just enjoyed the story, but yeah, there you go.

No.70427
File: 125648235164.jpg-(43.61KB, 540x540, toph.jpg)
70427
>>70423
Niiiiice.

No.74902
File: 12672490845.jpg-(46.31KB, 542x837, AzulaSuki.jpg)
74902
From the dead!

No.75183
File: 126817065697.jpg-(50.23KB, 900x818, Suki Feet.jpg)
75183

No.75184
>>74902
Shrinking Suki down to doll-size...that looks like quite the feat!

No.75185
>>75184

Quite, and now the feat is what she's looking at.

No.75222
File: 126835487080.jpg-(61.52KB, 665x900, Azula.jpg)
75222
Dear diary, jackpot.

No.75237
>>57636

How are we sure those are Katara's feet and not Sokka's?

No.75242
File: 12684292523.jpg-(24.13KB, 379x361, Katoph.jpg)
75242
>>75237

http://hanjoo.deviantart.com/art/The-morning-after-WIP-89899932

Word of God says it it's Katoph. Also did the lovely piece to my left.

No.75251
File: 126844831850.jpg-(65.24KB, 695x695, Mai Katara Toph.jpg)
75251
>>57636
Katara and Toph are about the same height.

>>75242
That’s more than likely Sokka on the left.

No.75253
>>75251

Not if you go by the actual show. Katara and Sokka are nearly the same height, with Katara little shorter, but Toph is even shorter than Aang, she only reaches up to Katara's shoulders at best.

No.75254
File: 126844972523.jpg-(49.38KB, 461x636, Height.jpg)
75254
>>75251

Well they're not miles apart, but there is at least a half a head difference or so.

And like before, once again, word of god says it's Katoph. Why you couldn't just follow the first link to the first piece and search the gallery and find that out yourself I don't know...but whatever.

http://hanjoo.deviantart.com/art/Kiss-without-Warning-Katoph-89813411

No.75294
File: 126852549524.jpg-(97.11KB, 650x813, Six.jpg)
75294
Six for the price of one mofo.

No.75296
>>75294
Tickling has always been one of those fetishes where I can see the appeal, but only if its in conjunction with conventional sexiness. Fully-clothed girls getting tickled, especially if there is no visible person doing it, just kind of confuses me.

No.75298
>>75296

You can't really try to apply logic to specific fetishes though.

Nothing that causes attraction has a logical, realistic appeal, aside from maybe some base universal evolutionary appeal in which developed breasts or shapely hips/buttocks symbolize a woman of mating age that's able to properly care for offspring. And hell, not even everyone shares those two.

But other than those two, most fetishes are just

A: the result of some physiological incident early in life where something slightly abnormal altered a child's mind, and later in life when the chemicals caught up during puberty, this became tied in with sexual arousal.

Or B: Fetishes are somehow tied in with genetics and we just don't have the tech to pinpoint what causes what yet.

Or C: a combination of both A and B.

Point is, trying to apply logic to fetish you don't share is like trying to understand how someone is attracted to a gender that you're not attracted to. It'll never really make perfect sense to you, so it's pointless to think about.

No.75299
>>75298
I like how empirically you think.

No.75300
>>75299

This is sarcasm, right?

>>75298

And you have to be a girl.

No.75301
>>57168
No, I wanna break her foot.

No.75302
>>75300
No. It wasn't sarcasm. The evolutionary biological causes behind many (if not most) mating behaviours in humans and other superior mammals are pretty well studied and documented. I mean, literally thousands and experiments and peer-reviewed papers being published each year on the subject.
So claims from >>75298 are pretty empirical, even point A which might sound a bit psychoanalytical has the physiological biochemical explanation beyond some freudian super-ego hypothesis.

Everything has an rational explanation. Unless, of course, you're one of statistical majority of Americans who misunderstand evolutionary theories after some "men came from monkeys" oversimplification fallacy.

No.75305
>>75302

Look who found their first encyclopedia!

No.75307
>>75305
Yeah :D
I love my science books. They have answers for things.

No.75309
>>75300

Actually I'm a guy, although I don't really know what about my statement lead you to think I was a girl. If anything, when I now reread it, it seems more stereotypically male oriented than anything else. I was very straight forward and totally took all the passion and magic out of attraction and broke it down into cold, hard fact.

>>75299
>>75302

And thank you very much. You're not the first person to compliment me on that. Lol.

No.75314
>>75309

Ah, sorry. It's just when I hear people talking bollocks on the internet I automatically assume its a girl.

I should really learn to be less sexist.

No.75338
File: 126862299557.jpg-(30.79KB, 365x638, mai.jpg)
75338

No.75370
>>57636
oh god moar

No.75511
File: 126895952246.jpg-(105.22KB, 900x1350, Toph.jpg)
75511

No.81711
File: 127862860224.jpg-(49.25KB, 334x447, toph.jpg)
81711



Main FAQ [ baw ] [ co / cog / jam / mtv / tek ] [ ck / coc / draw / writ ] [ pco / coq ] [ a / op / pkmn ] [ n ]
0.036518096923828 (0.04 seconds )