I can also do stereogram animations, if anyone funds 'em. Red/green ones too, not that I have the glasses....

>>72928

lol people pay for this shit? i'm jealous

>>72943
I've heard that one before.

Are you able to articulate what is wrong with it? I intend to give points for constructive criticism too.

>>72971

well i can't give any technical advice since you know more about the programs you use than i do but i suggest looking at videos of people actually having sex and using them as examples instead of referencing chuck e. cheese animatronics

>>72971
The green dude's texture and the way Starfire's legs are posed look pretty distracting, and the animation looks stiff and unnatural. I think you should use proper reference

looks good. my horniness approves

I did use reference actually, normally I don't.

Sasha here.

Green dude. Okay, that's a valid point, it's a different kind of shading altogether.

>>72990
>the animation looks stiff and unnatural

hentaikid's animation has looked stiff and unnatural since he started, it's kind of amazing how little he's improved in that regard

>>73001
I would've kept the reference angle instead of the one you used, it's too low and it's hard to read on how she's placed.
Still, interesting project, keep the good work.

>>72971
what jumps out at me is that there's a lot of unique movements which hangs a lantern on the fact that its a loop.
also starfire and that green guy seem to be cellshaded differently.

>>73007

LOL yeah... sure.

>>73019

AHAHAAHAHahahahahhahha oh lordy...

Zst giving criticism.

Anyhoo, sounds like a good method of payment instead of pretending anything you put online will stay behind a wall for more than a day.

>>73007

Seconding this, also, some backgrounds or it just looks like they're floating in a blue void.

>>73006
Yeah with all the constructive criticism I get, it's amazing. I either get "awesome, here's 20 bucks" or "Die in a fire u suck". And I can't exactly go post in Cgtalk to get feedback.

>>72990
Matched the guy's shading. It made more of a difference than I expected. If you'd posted that as a comment on my site I'd give you points, but unfortunately I can't tell one anon from another here.

>>73007
Different angles I can do, a member just funded a bit more so I'm working on another view and position. See low res wip pic attached.

>>73019
It seems less is more, people prefer a simple loop with no variation, throw in a bit of panning to camouflage it, and presto...

3d tends to "die" if it's not moving so I tend to try to move a lot of stuff so it won't look stiff. I'm open to suggestions for better ways to do it...

http://www.3dtotal.com/pages/tutorials/tutorialsmax_ani.php

I hate 3D porn for the most part, but I kinda like this.

>>73042
making sure everything is moving is the first step to a convincing animation. Since the fact is: everything is moving all the time. I've only made a few loops personally, but the loops i made i constantly reviewed and tweaked. until it seemed logical that what I was seeing was actually longer than the 2 seconds of animation I made.
like make everyone do something they could conceivably be doing once or twice every interval of the loop. of course longer loops work better, but have bigger file sizes.

Welp here's a fixed version of the first one, see if there's any improvement to the whole ineffable roboticity of it all.

Being that the original series is TV limited animation I should probably try to move things the least possible, really.

Hey HK!
Nice to see you are still doing your stuff. And I, for one, see a lot of improvement.
Great job!

Interesting... last night I posted on my site a couple of test animations of the other camera angle. I noticed I'd neglected to stamp my url on them but figured what the hell.

So today I notice those two (But not the larger, better quality gifs I've posted here that do have the url on them) had been uploaded to the rule34 site.

People hate urls on images, but if there's no stamp it just becomes "stuff found on the web". It's a catch 22

>>73141
Thanks!

>>73172

Just tag 'em.

>>73178
that's not the point, but thanks for reading, I guess.

Anyway, they got the early version which is a lot shorter and lower res, this one's better. And has moving hair.

The iron man celshaded series went with non moving helmet hair and they probably were right to do so, the more things you start moving the more you have to keep track of, though sometimes you can get away with automated dynamics. But in something like the teen titans cartoon more often it was stuff like hair or capes that moved even if the characters were still.

Anyway I won't be posting anymore here, but if anyone wants to repost anything relevant from there be my guest, and feedback is very welcome. I have some /co related stuff on offer like Blackfire or Harley Quinn that might get made in the future, if someone funds it.

>>73212
Cel-shaded shows like Iron Man might be a good thing to try to do sometime, even if just to see if you can mimic that style. 2D stuff like Teen Titans seems like it'd be harder.

>>73212

the arms are like rubberbands.

her face looks better though.

still need a bit o practice kid.

>>73212
cell shading is lame anyways IMO. put a dark noisy specular map on that shit, and have a sub-surface scattering material and that'd look boss. Get that nice conflict of realism signifiers on a stylized design.

>>73212

Did you do other Teen Titans?
I'd love to see you have Terra being treated to the same sweet butt care! :3

Good stuff, Hentaikid.

>>73240

It's almost like you know what the hell you're talking about, that's so cute.

>>73212
Very nice work.
One bit of criticism though. The way her hair moves is kinda distracting. I would either have the movements be smaller and more subtle, or just forget about animating the hair altogether and focus on the body.

>>73281
>he doesn't realize that starfire's eyebrows are actually cooling vents where hot gases escape

what a fag!

>>73333
Lol yeah the hair movement doesn't sinc well with the movement in the second half. It looks better in the first part (That one's posted on my site, not here)
>>73251
I can do Terra, yeah. If someone funds it! :)
Only 39.95 with the current offer of points until the end of august, there ain't no one offering semi-custom animations cheaper! Lucky I have that sweatshop of Philipino workers actually doing the work for me.

I'll probably feed her a sammich though, her design is practically a stick figure...

>>73213
Yeah I should try and mimic the Iron Man show, I probably could come really close. Not sure Pepper or Whitney give me "the boner", but it's not about what I like...

>>73474
>Yeah I should try and mimic the Iron Man show, I probably could come really close
If you can, you could be the 3D/cel-shaded version of Zone, or something. =P

>>73476
I've actually been around longer than him, I started my site in 2002... never became high profile, but I haven't done too badly.

Oh I also made a Raven model too

>>73518
My apologies

>>73518
looks great, can you upload it so i can create my own creepy raven sexposes?

>>73521
You'd need to buy animation master, but there's a bunch of free models out for blender and then there's virtual girl.

>>73520

No apologies needed! Like the man said earlier, I probably should be a lot better considering how long I've been at this :)

>>73525
Hash's Animation Master?! No shit. That's the first program I used to make 3D stuff like 11 years ago. Shit was so cash, and by far the best piece of animation software I've ever used. Lacks power and versatility when it comes to the actual modelling unfortunately.

what you could do if you wanted to share the models is to export it as an obj or 3ds. it'll loose all of its rigging, but do you really want people who don't know what they're doing fagging up your artwork on poser?

Shit, hentaikid, I remember you. I used to lurk/e-stalk people on the Ecchi Attack/Prince/Walker Punches The Mexican forums years ago. I remember that the people who ran it totally hated you.
I never cared for your porn terribly much, but I used to follow your livejournal. I remember that you wrote about/linked to some pretty interesting stuff.

>>73624

>do you really want people who don't know what they're doing fagging up your artwork on poser?

It's like raaaiiin on your wedding day...

>>73627
I'm still on livejournal, link postan

And I still e-stalk Rev Brandon and Bloiffy, but they just don't post as much anymore :(
A bunch of e-a folks ended up at the SA forums, amusingly most of them got banned long before I did.
I can't remember what his ea forums name was because he commits e-suicide every 6 months or so but this guy was also a regular I've kept track of
http://posthistoricpress.blogspot.com/
I like to think whenever I get a particularly venomous yet ingenuous flame it's one of the e-a kids coming back for old times sake. That place had energy, pity it's all lost to the bitrot.

>>73624
I've been thinking of jumping to a new app, maybe blender if they fix the interface as promised for 2.6 but hash is like an old glove at this point. I'm still using the 2006 version, tried last years and wasn't convinced to move to it. I've been burned in the past upgrading their software, I still miss some of the options in the early versions.

http://ecchiattack.com/

for those who never saw the site when it was up originally. The older articles are better.

>>73637
it's great, but once you move on to strict poly modeling you realize how restricted you were modeling in splines all the time.

>>73627
>>73637
I once made an account on the old E-A forums, made a mistake and said something very stupid, and was mocked mercilessly for it. I never logged on again out of shame, but for years afterward I kept following the forum and practically everything that several of the people on there ever made in a way that, looking back on it now, was really creepy and makes me wonder what the hell was wrong with me. I don't believe I ever did actually work up the courage to try talking to them ever again. It's kind of a funny flashback for me to see that some of these people are still around.

Anyway, I wish I could give you some kind of constructive criticism on your work, but 3d art really doesn't appeal to me at all so I'd be at a loss on what to say.

>>73683
I don't feel particularly restricted in modelling, I just get the feeling Hash is gonna go out of business soon and I probably shouldn't be married to their software. Also they still can't handle multicore rendering...

>>73776
The secret is I don't like 3d much either but I like drawing inbetweens even less, I can draw but drawing 12 times to get one second just isn't my thing. See old attached gif for example

EA was a small forum with some really interesting people. After their flames I get really disappointed with the kind of lame hur durr PAUNCHs I get most of the time. People saying they like it is nice of course but if I just wanted praise I could get more posting Po-ju dojinshi on /h

There's two types of feedback I like, stuff that tells me what people see is wrong with a pic or animation so I can change it and really well crafted flames. I still remember the Rev's "It looks like it was made with a spastic on ms paint" or Sak's "It looks like a quadratic equation in drag". If you're gonna try to hurt my feelings, don't insult me by assuming it's going to be easy :)

>>73518

very good raven model

>>73518
Zone started in 1999 though.
Your Raven model looks great!

>>73797
Really? Always thought he came along later

>>73826
He was pretty quiet for a few years there before he started doing his flash work.

Rule34 has some of his ancient stuff for the curious.

>>73834

Yeah I remember him posting a lot of pokemon pics, I too made some pr0n before opening my site

>>73784
So 3d isn't really your preferred medium and 2d is too labor-intensive. If you don't mind my asking then why did you decide that this was for you? Do you actually earn enough money to make it all worth it? Or did something just one day make you decide that porn animations were the career choice for you?

>>73936
he should be a producer for porn if he doesn't like working.

A porn artist lacking in work ethic. Shocking, I know.

What is the world coming to. :)
>>73936

It's the same medium, just different production techniques. Stop motion, drawing, 3d, it's animation. If you'd ever hand drawn 57 frames of some character doing something and then had to redo them because it looked off you'd appreciate the wonders of technology like I do. And don't get me started on colouring.

Plus with 3d I can reuse animations like so
>>73518

As for why porn, I like porn, and I really don't have any non porn stories to tell (Though there are some sci fi books I'd love to adapt, but that's never gonna happen)

Plus, easy money, yes. I never made big cash but back in 2002 especially, it was really easy, unlike most artists I've actually studied the online adult biz , it's been quite an education and right now I'm working on mainstream web stuff that I couldn't have figured out if I hadn't had the training wheels of running my site.

Anyway I admit before I had a cavalier attitude about my porn but recently I came to the conclusion that of all the things I do in this life this is probably the one that's gonna be around the longest after I'm gone, so I might as well make it a worthwhile legacy.

*patriotic music sounds*
...something... in my eye...

>>73968
cool hair movements, nice model too

>>73968
uhmm have you ever tried 2.5d with vectors that simulate 3d?
It gives a crisp cell-shading effect, from what I've seen.

http://www.alecrivers.com/2.5dcartoonmodels/

>>73978
hm I've done similar things in that you can put drawings over the 3d model, say put cartoony Xs

here I did a quick test of the O_O face they often pulled on the show

>>73969
The hair movement (And the boobs) is just an automated dynamic constraint, that's why it bounces so high - there's a collision and it jumps up - you like it but other people get really bent out of shape over something like that "Argh what's wrong with her hair!?" and it's like I'd come to their house and murdered their dog.

I don't mind but it makes it hard to tell when the feedback is worth listening to, you know? :)