I like this. Do you?
There is a distinct lack of genitalia.
Post the rest (at least, if it's porn).
Got distracted by the Mario thing
That's all. Whadja think?
That was quite good!
This is adorable! :3
Seconding the two posts above me. To be honest, I've mulled a similar concept over in my head a few times, but then again it's not entirely uncommon.
you'll never have a sexy monster under your bed to fuck you every night sadfrog.jpg
Needs to be one with the genders reversed.
>>63608Not sure if I've ever seen that variant.Incidentally, was this drawn by a female? Something about the monster's design gives me that impression.
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAR
THIS. I APPROVE OF THIS.>>63610Certainly feels like it. Gotta say, I like it better than the usual rigamoral we get from you menfolks.
>>63610>>63630Weird, you kind of have a point.I guess there's some inherent extra value anyway for something that's the product of a woman's dirty mind than a man's. Ah, the double-standard.
>>63660Well, it's not really that. I guess because there's equal focus on the hot guy and the hot girl. And... Well, I'm going to be blunt. A lot of the porn on this board is... Not very good, because a lot of guys are desperate for tits, they don't much care that the face is wonky and the vagina is in the wrong place, as long as it's porn. Chicks maybe have higher standards? I dunno.... Girl or guy, more from this artist.
>>63664Aside from the great lesbian, dat ass, zone, ovens, avatar, rule 63, misc. 34, and pokemon white/black threads on the first couple pages I completely... sorta... kiiiiiiiinda agree... but there's still a lot of really good art sprinkled over the other threads.
>>63664To be honest, I personally have a bad eye for anatomical errors in art of all kinds.But the reason that I suspected the artist's gender was that the monster matched a common female idea of hotness which I can only describe as "kind of like something from Bleach." Not that I don't like it, of course.
>>63672Maybe I just have high standards, but it's still few and far between to me. Honestly, I suppose maybe since it is made by a chick, it appeals more to a chick, since this comic has a lot of stuff that appeals to me.In conclusion: kinky chicks make the best porn.>>63673Oh yes, that is a good contributing factor to it. THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIES.
>>63675>high standardsMaybe a better phrase would be "different taste in promotions"?
>>63675>THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIES.This is certainly something that we must all keep in mind.
>>63677Or that.>>63678Genome, you are a good friend.
>>63675>kinky chicks make the best porn.>THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIESDon't mind if I agree with you.
>>63664>>A lot of the porn on this board is... Not very good, because a lot of guys are desperate for tits, they don't much care that the face is wonky and the vagina is in the wrong place, as long as it's pornYes, yes, so VERY yes.That messes with me to no end. There's no shortage of plain tits and ass on the internet, and no shortage of photography of absolutely gorgeous women who're kind enough to show off all of the above.Pornographic art is still *art*, and we should hold it to standards like these. There's still certainly different tastes to be accounted for, but it bothers me to no end when an artist who plainly has at least the *potential* to learn more and draw something entirely beautiful instead focuses purely on the gooshy bits with no thought whatsoever for WHY we're attracted to these things in the first place. Maybe that's too high a demand for the types who regards their scribbles as nothing more than fap-fodder to be thrown aside after you're done, but fuck that, take some PRIDE in your goddamn work! Additionally: Much as I prefer women and women alone in my own porn, if I have to look at a guy in there he ought to be at least decent-looking as well. It does nothing for me sexually, but there's something to be said for aesthetically decent dudes complementing the ladies. That would perhaps be yet another argument in favor of porn created *by* women for *both* sexes to enjoy. Pic related only because a girl drew it.
Also, DA gallery of the artist of the OP comic: http://savannahhorrocks.deviantart.com/ Says to be female, so there ya go. She does seem to have a thing for monster-y dudes.
>>63686There's no shame in simple smut, though. Yes, it's annoying when it outnumbers the artistic stuff so drastically (i.e. most of the time), but I for one have no problem with indulging in pornography of the unambitious variety. It's like french fries: I'd never choose them over something a little less junky, but there's no harm in snacking.>>63687I remember stumbling upon her; she has some top-notch stuff (pic related).
>>63690Indeed.
>>63684Also, I should add that apart of kinky gals, there are other talented people that can do amazing stuff, like most of our drawfags. Anyways, I wanted to be a little more specific about my statement, so sage for not contributing with something useful for the thread.
bump
keep this apple headed shit off here. Sameface and shitty furfag art.
>>72597Oh, I'm sorry, are you a person of any importance? Am I? No.Is anyone else complaining about this? Nope. Do you have any point whatsoever? Not really!