plus4chan
ImageboardsRadio
Site Theme...
imageboards
Main FAQ [ baw] [ co / cog / jam / mtv / tek ] [ ck / coc / draw / writ ] [ pco / coq ] [ a / op / pkmn ] [ n ]
PRRRROMOTIONS

 Posting a reply to post #63579
Name
Email
Subject  
Message
File 
Password  


File: 127526620497.jpg-(216.89KB, 545x741, 1272470264.savannahhorrocks_page1finish.jpg)
63579 No.63579
I like this. Do you?

Expand all images
No.63580
There is a distinct lack of genitalia.

No.63581
Post the rest (at least, if it's porn).

No.63582
File: 127526843288.jpg-(239.07KB, 537x733, 1272470713.savannahhorrocks_page2finish.jpg)
63582
Got distracted by the Mario thing

No.63583
File: 127526846011.jpg-(232.34KB, 537x733, 1272470768.savannahhorrocks_page3finish.jpg)
63583

No.63584
File: 127526850527.jpg-(215.30KB, 537x733, 1272470815.savannahhorrocks_page4finish.jpg)
63584

No.63586
File: 127526857426.jpg-(228.49KB, 537x733, 1272470878.savannahhorrocks_page5finish.jpg)
63586

No.63587
File: 127526862444.jpg-(228.87KB, 537x733, 1272470973.savannahhorrocks_page6finish.jpg)
63587

No.63589
File: 127526865415.jpg-(235.71KB, 537x733, 1272471076.savannahhorrocks_page7finish.jpg)
63589

No.63591
File: 127526967656.jpg-(224.69KB, 537x733, 1272471162.savannahhorrocks_page8finish.jpg)
63591

No.63593
File: 127526976535.jpg-(215.21KB, 537x733, 1272471240.savannahhorrocks_page9finish.jpg)
63593

No.63594
File: 127526981155.jpg-(171.21KB, 537x733, 1272471325.savannahhorrocks_page10finish.jpg)
63594
That's all. Whadja think?

No.63595
That was quite good!

No.63597
This is adorable! :3

No.63598
Seconding the two posts above me. To be honest, I've mulled a similar concept over in my head a few times, but then again it's not entirely uncommon.

No.63603
you'll never have a sexy monster under your bed to fuck you every night
sadfrog.jpg

No.63608
Needs to be one with the genders reversed.

No.63610
>>63608
Not sure if I've ever seen that variant.

Incidentally, was this drawn by a female? Something about the monster's design gives me that impression.

No.63612
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAR

No.63630
THIS. I APPROVE OF THIS.

>>63610
Certainly feels like it. Gotta say, I like it better than the usual rigamoral we get from you menfolks.

No.63660
>>63610
>>63630
Weird, you kind of have a point.
I guess there's some inherent extra value anyway for something that's the product of a woman's dirty mind than a man's. Ah, the double-standard.

No.63664
>>63660
Well, it's not really that. I guess because there's equal focus on the hot guy and the hot girl. And... Well, I'm going to be blunt. A lot of the porn on this board is... Not very good, because a lot of guys are desperate for tits, they don't much care that the face is wonky and the vagina is in the wrong place, as long as it's porn. Chicks maybe have higher standards? I dunno.

... Girl or guy, more from this artist.

No.63672
>>63664

Aside from the great lesbian, dat ass, zone, ovens, avatar, rule 63, misc. 34, and pokemon white/black threads on the first couple pages I completely... sorta... kiiiiiiiinda agree... but there's still a lot of really good art sprinkled over the other threads.

No.63673
>>63664
To be honest, I personally have a bad eye for anatomical errors in art of all kinds.

But the reason that I suspected the artist's gender was that the monster matched a common female idea of hotness which I can only describe as "kind of like something from Bleach." Not that I don't like it, of course.

No.63675
>>63672
Maybe I just have high standards, but it's still few and far between to me. Honestly, I suppose maybe since it is made by a chick, it appeals more to a chick, since this comic has a lot of stuff that appeals to me.

In conclusion: kinky chicks make the best porn.

>>63673
Oh yes, that is a good contributing factor to it. THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIES.

No.63677
>>63675
>high standards

Maybe a better phrase would be "different taste in promotions"?

No.63678
>>63675
>THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIES.
This is certainly something that we must all keep in mind.

No.63682
>>63677
Or that.

>>63678
Genome, you are a good friend.

No.63684
>>63675
>kinky chicks make the best porn.
>THIS BOARD NEEDS MORE HOT MENFOLK BONING THE LADIES
Don't mind if I agree with you.

No.63686
File: 127536692925.jpg-(342.47KB, 900x565, 1203735458575.jpg)
63686
>>63664
>>A lot of the porn on this board is... Not very good, because a lot of guys are desperate for tits, they don't much care that the face is wonky and the vagina is in the wrong place, as long as it's porn

Yes, yes, so VERY yes.

That messes with me to no end. There's no shortage of plain tits and ass on the internet, and no shortage of photography of absolutely gorgeous women who're kind enough to show off all of the above.

Pornographic art is still *art*, and we should hold it to standards like these. There's still certainly different tastes to be accounted for, but it bothers me to no end when an artist who plainly has at least the *potential* to learn more and draw something entirely beautiful instead focuses purely on the gooshy bits with no thought whatsoever for WHY we're attracted to these things in the first place. Maybe that's too high a demand for the types who regards their scribbles as nothing more than fap-fodder to be thrown aside after you're done, but fuck that, take some PRIDE in your goddamn work!

Additionally: Much as I prefer women and women alone in my own porn, if I have to look at a guy in there he ought to be at least decent-looking as well. It does nothing for me sexually, but there's something to be said for aesthetically decent dudes complementing the ladies. That would perhaps be yet another argument in favor of porn created *by* women for *both* sexes to enjoy.

Pic related only because a girl drew it.

No.63687
Also, DA gallery of the artist of the OP comic: http://savannahhorrocks.deviantart.com/ Says to be female, so there ya go. She does seem to have a thing for monster-y dudes.

No.63690
File: 127537037583.jpg-(108.79KB, 600x598, Manatee_Mermaid_by_savannahhorrocks.jpg)
63690
>>63686
There's no shame in simple smut, though. Yes, it's annoying when it outnumbers the artistic stuff so drastically (i.e. most of the time), but I for one have no problem with indulging in pornography of the unambitious variety. It's like french fries: I'd never choose them over something a little less junky, but there's no harm in snacking.

>>63687
I remember stumbling upon her; she has some top-notch stuff (pic related).

No.63692
File: 127537212668.jpg-(717.62KB, 687x952, 8dcd8af45e9bf095bee6ef9294a04bf4.jpg)
63692
>>63690
Indeed.

No.63694
>>63684
Also, I should add that apart of kinky gals, there are other talented people that can do amazing stuff, like most of our drawfags. Anyways, I wanted to be a little more specific about my statement, so sage for not contributing with something useful for the thread.

No.72475
bump

No.72597
keep this apple headed shit off here. Sameface and shitty furfag art.

No.72644
>>72597
Oh, I'm sorry, are you a person of any importance? Am I? No.

Is anyone else complaining about this? Nope.

Do you have any point whatsoever? Not really!



Main FAQ [ baw] [ co / cog / jam / mtv / tek ] [ ck / coc / draw / writ ] [ pco / coq ] [ a / op / pkmn ] [ n ]
0.0090758800506592 (0.01 seconds )