/pkmn/ Pokémon Archived Board plus4chan home [baw] [co/cog/jam/mtv] [coc/draw/diy] [pco/coq/cod] [a/mspa/op/pkmn] [Burichan/Futaba/Greygren]
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 25489)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)

Currently 0 unique user posts.

News
  • 08/21/12 - Poll ended; /cod/ split off as a new board from /pco/.

File 134378967481.jpg - (52.72KB , 609x473 , Farfetch'd evo.jpg )
25489 No. 25489
Fans have been clamoring for Farfetch'd to get an evolution for years. Should he get one?
Expand all images
>> No. 25490
>Fans have been clamoring
You mean idiots and kids have been clamoring? Because all the Fans I talk to have been clamoring on how stupid it is/was to cram pre-and-e-volutions onto Pokemon that didn't have them.
>> No. 25491
>>25490
>You mean idiots and kids have been clamoring?
Sure, if you want to be blunt about it.
>> No. 25492
Well it WOULD be nice if Torus, Pinser, Farfetch'd and a whole lot of other 'useless' pokemon got SOME kind of buff.
That's not to say they should get an evolution and lord forbid a babby form, but they could use some stat boosts and a movepool rejiggering at the least.
Gamefreak has already shown us that they just don't give a fuck about balance with B2W2, so why not try and give these guys a little attention?
>> No. 25495
>>25492
I'd be up for them having alternate Forms in order to get said boost. At least it would be something different than only legendaries and "special" Pokemon (like Rotom) having Forms.
>> No. 25505
File 134385124484.jpg - (185.46KB , 850x692 , sample_2a4be73e0427dc162e9d52badb4c4d6979dd3378.jpg )
25505
MY OFFICIAL OPINIONS ON WHAT POKEMONS NEED TO GET EVOLUTIONS AND PREVOLUTIONS!!!

NEED AND EVOLUTION:
Dunsparce
Parasect
Pinsir
Ariados
Ledian
Sunflora
Qwilfish
Corsola
Octillery!!!
Stantler
Sableeye
Mawile
Plusle
Minun
Volbeat
Ilumise
Torkoal
Relicanth
Luvdisc
Pachirisu
Carnivine
Audino
Basculin
Emolga
Stunfisk

ONES THAT NEED A PREVO

Tauros
Miltank (Should have a common prevolution and evolve depending on gender)
Kangaskan (Seriously, they've had one pre-designed since gen 1)
Heracross
Skarmory
Tropius
Drudigon
>> No. 25506
I think the next gen should just have a bunch of (at least) second forms for previously-existing Pokemon and additions onto previously-existing ideas instead of an entirely new thing.

I feel like there's a lot I wished got more fleshed-out before getting stuff entirely new.
>> No. 25507
File 134386038258.jpg - (50.17KB , 560x477 , Quetzalcoatl_telleriano.jpg )
25507
>Dunsparce
>> No. 25541
>>25505
Ok, I've got to agree with you on some, and totally disagree on others.
>Dunsparce
Ok, I'm conflicted here as I love the hell out of these lil guys, though I despise actually using them in a fight. I guess they could, in sort of a Magicarp to Gyarados sort of thing, like >>25507

Pinsir needs to be left alone I would say personally. as for those other first few bugs, sure I guess. Heracross is fine as is too. Other than that, the rest aren't anything to major to point out.

Will say that Pachirisu and Emolga should have been related in an evolutionary family. They're both electric squirrels, and I'm pretty sure they were only separated due to that Gen V new pkmn only deal.

I find it very bizarre that Tauros and Miltank are male and female versions due to weird designs differences. I also thought that Bouffalant should have been the evolved form of Tauros, but then Gen V.

I like that fake-mon ideas have explored these possibilities; honestly makes me wish GameFreak would take some sort of competition for designs from these people and try to work things out. But that's for another thread i think.
>> No. 25544
>>25489
Only if it's named Farflun'g.
>> No. 25565
>>25541
It's entirely possible. At least naming-wise, I know Nintendo adopted "Leafeon", "Eeveelution", and "Shiny" as official terms when fans had been using them for years. Whether that's just the translators or the company period, though, I have no idea.
>> No. 25679
>>25541
Pachirisu and Emolga were separated because they need one Pikachu clone per generation.
>> No. 25680
>>25679
Didn't stop Gen 2.
>> No. 25683
>>25679
Are you people still on about this?
>> No. 25684
>>25680
Pichu
>> No. 25685
>>25684
His point was that they weren't part of the same evolutionary line because they were two seperate gens' Pikachu clones.
I pointed out that Pichu was gen 2's Pikachu clone, and still part of the same evolutionary line as a previous Pikachu.
Yes.
>> No. 25695
Well considering how I love Farfetch'd but he's an absolutely unusable and terrible pokemon, he totally needs an evolution.
>> No. 25809
>>25695
Or, get this;

You can just use him because you like him.

Bwah, I know. Mind blowing shit.
>I like PokemonA so there should be PokemonB that's better so I can use it
wat?
>> No. 25823
>>25695
>Farfetch'd
>terrible and unusable
Then you don't like it very much do you?
>> No. 25830
>>25695
you can sweep the gen 3 E4 with nothing but a luvdisc if that luvdisc is the best goddamn luvdisc you've ever trained, you have no excuses, enjoy your farfetch'd
>> No. 25866
I imagine that he'd merge with his leek and become a flying/grass type. And his final evolution would be some horrible, vine covered monstrosity.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason