>> |
No. 28310
>>28307
He does. In a character sense anyway.
Nami and Robin's only flaws are that they're primarily non-combat characters in a shonen fighting series.
Plus I feel like Oda may have written himself into a corner by having so many characters cause, even if he can split them up, there's still the issue of what happens when the utility one is right next to the combat one. Take the Monet scene:
Assume Robin did decide to fight Monet right there... okay. Good for her. Except the guy who's a major combatant and force to be reckoned with is standing right next to you and is not only better equipped and trained to fight something head-on, but is also probably better for the job in general.
And don't give me "Zorro could help stop the kids", because I'm PRETTY SURE Robin's probably better at stopping someone via nonlethal means than Zorro is. So yes, Robin could've taken the battle, except it really wouldn't have made a lick of sense at the time and only served to make it look like Oda HAD to have the women fight each other.
See? If you twist your logic around enough it's literally a lose/lose situation.
|