>>81493
Not that other anon that complained about the pic, just a lurker but slash crossplay and photomanips make me cringe.

I'm sorry, but it creeps me out. Especially the crossplay because no matter how good the costume or clothing is, one can always tell a person's gender mostly by the face alone. There's always something in the body structure and/or facial structure that gives it away, it breaks the suspension of disbelief and feels wrong. Makes me feel uncomfortable. A kind of 'uncanny valley' feeling.

Manips make me feel sorry for the actors. A kind of "Spanish-Shame" or "Fremdschämen".

P.S. The two people in the pic are clearly girls.

Polite sage for personal ramblings and a dick since this is /coq/ after all.

>>81507
BEHOLD. http://www.chinasmack.com/2010/pictures/amazing-asian-pretty-boys-cross-dressers.html
Betcha can't tell which are men or women.

>>81529
uh, yes i can. and this is kind of off-topic. now we're not even talking about erik/charles cosplayers.

>>81507

Then fucking scroll instead of spouting garbage about how you can always tell.

FUCK YOU ALL for gender-policing. whether those people have tits or vulvas is none of your goddamn business, and the softness of their features or roundness of their face or WHAT THE FUCK EVER has nothing to do with their gender. It's not something you can SEE, and the point is that they are playing MALES so therefore should be considered MALE in the image.

tldr; PORN OR GTFO

>>81556
i'm trans and any kind of romantic(???) cosplay weirds me out regardless of gender tbh, they just don't look like the actors they're portraying features-wise (not just these people in specific, this is how i feel about this in general) and it's not really something i can get into. i have no problem seeing them as men if that's what they ID as, it's just that they're random people

>>82449
this is the cutest

i...i need the sauce on this...immediately. literal mindfucking/mind control is my strongest kink

>>82684
Anon has tried Googling by image to find sauce but no sauce wants to be found. All Anon knows is that it was cross-posted from the /cm/.

Moar from http://ask-erikandcharles.tumblr.com/ !

Also, hey, anyone have any good mind control/mindfuck fics? The more the merrier.

>>82684
It's from this big bang fic (http://archiveofourown.org/works/294647/chapters/471394) but it's not actually mindfucking. Sorry

>>81556
Those two are clearly NOT male. If they identify as men, whatever, but they're pretty clearly not male. And their sex organs might not be any of our business, but I know they were born with vaginas, and that doesn't turn me on at all. I'm not the anon who complained, nor am I going to get into a whole discussion about the kind of content other people choose to post here. In my opinion, those two are playing the part of two guys kissing, and whether they're actually guys or not doesn't fucking matter one bit.

But don't pretend the anon's comment wasn't valid. I disagree with it and this is not the right place to discuss the matter anyway, but don't just shrug it off as gender-policing. Although I disagree with the anon, I know where he/she is coming from. Females absolutely do not turn me on, whether they ID as men or not, whether they're playing men or not.

I come to /coq/ expecting to see males. If I happen to see females dressed as male then, well, too bad for me. I'm not going to actually complain about it. But that doesn't mean anon's comment wasn't valid, and you just acted like he/she was saying something absurd and super-offensive.

>>82707

I sort of agree? Though I think you're wording it waaaay to strongly. If they identify as men, I'll acknowledge them as men, but I don't come here to see vaginas even if it's a dude's vagina.

This is a porn board for the physically male body. We don't have to consider them physically male in their image if they cannot provide us images that are physically male in a board specifically about physical male images. Basically.

In the end, /coq/ is for cock. Like, literally. Literal cock.

[ sauce, jic: http://ettubru.tumblr.com/post/13478864208/ ]

>>82707
>>82722

Can we just stop discussing it at all? I kind of had assumed we had all reached a (technically non-verbal) consensus to just not post cosplay of ANY kind EVER (be the cosplayers of ANY gender/sex) as of >>81575 or thereabouts. To be honest, though, I'm getting a little tired of reading about this particular discussion. I came here to see cock, not fight with my fellow anons about what makes a cock actually a cock or not and most definitely not for wank. I'm sorry to say, but skip it if you don't like it, by this point. It's like fighting over pictures of men in drag: it might be your thing or it might not, but you move on regardless. What's done is done until it's either deleted or we get a new thread or something.


Instead of posting wank, post some CONTENT instead, please and thank you.

>>82722
>>82707

sure is tumblr in here.

>Last stop by thread in November
>Drama, I'll see if it blows over later
>Still drama

Really?

>>82730
I didn't realize discussions were against the rules. So super sorry for giving my opinion about a matter I thought was relevant.

>>82841
How is this drama and why are people here so fucking sensitive about a disagreement?

It's like everytime I post something here that isn't porn (aka my opinion on anything) SOMEONE has to call it drama/tell me to shut the hell up/act like a general sucker about it. I think I'll get going now.

*blinkblink*

So! Who has pictures of Michael Fassbender's penis? Anyone?

>>82909
Hint: It's because people are here to fap, not discuss social issues.

>>82952
Uhh, does this count ? It's mostly his super-shiny ass from Hunger, though.
No leaks on Shame that I have found yet, unfortunately. I give this film some serious props for lasting this long without a leak.

>>82967
Fassbender's flaccid red mongoose jiggles all over the place in Shame, but FAPPER BEWARE -- it is a "real" movie, in that his sweet peen is used to elicit highly melancholy emotions in the context of the dramatic story.

Depends entirely on how much shame you feel watching a movie about shame titled "Shame" for potentially shame-ful reasons.

Out of the sad context, he does get a BJ from a dude though, and an enterprising gif maker will surely find a way to composite the back of James McAvoy's head in there. Or... more likely... Nigel Thorrnberry's head.

>>83586
Here's a clearer gif

>>84454
I MUST KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS

>>84454
WHOA
WHOA
my bonerz need links to this

>>84454
Holy jesus fuck in a hat!
What is this epicness?