>> |
No. 219756
>Yardley! has five kids, according to Wiki Speaking as the oldest of five kids, ouch.
>>219744 >Neither was Yardley when he started. You're probably right in this. Yardley has been with us for quite some time now, and all I can remember is his recent stuff. I'd have to dig up his old stuff for a comparison; however, when he joined up it was light years better than most of what the comic in the recent history before him, so that likely plays into my feelings about his art. I'm more than happy to give Gaylord a chance.
>That is a /terrible/ reason to like an art style. It's a great reason, assuming you're seeking those qualities while looking at art. But that's neither here nor there, as I said that I liked his Bunnie*; not his girls in general (we've only had Bunnie and part of Nicole and Sally, so it would be too soon to really judge on that premise anyway) nor that I even liked his art; I said I don't dislike it, meaning that I'm okay with it but would not prefer it.
> his bodies are short (which is Sonic standard, so that's fine) But that was what felt off about it to me, his bodies seem tall; taller than we've really seen in recent issues, at least. Perhaps the longer arms you talk about are what give me that feeling, at least in part.
>Bunnie's arm is bending BACKWARDS when she's tossing the helmet. Okay, looking at that panel again I see what you mean. That is unnatural (at least, when I tried to do it.) The limbs are a bit long in some instances (like Sonic striking his pose, waiting for the door to open) but I didn't otherwise notice anything horrible (but my sleep schedule is messed up and I could just be missing it.)
>That's mean I wasn't making fun of it, I was commenting on the inevitability of someone cracking jokes on the expense of his last name (likely not here, but this is the internet so it's certainly going to happen somewhere.)
>anon. Now I'm not even sure you read my post.
*Well, one version of it; her model changes throughout the issue, primarily in head shape.
|