/baw/ General Discussion Archived Board plus4chan home [baw] [co/cog/jam/mtv] [coc/draw/diy] [pco/coq/cod] [a/mspa/op/pkmn] [Burichan/Futaba/Greygren]
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 375124)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)

Currently 0 unique user posts.

News
  • 08/21/12 - Poll ended; /cod/ split off as a new board from /pco/.

File 136348251396.jpg - (125.17KB , 494x338 , florian_cardboard_corolla_1.jpg )
375124 No. 375124
hey i just remembered something anonymous image boards are good for

talking about the most truly terrible or awesome things that we do except no names.

so give us all your best or worst. i need these. because of reasons.

picture don't matter.
36 posts omitted. Last 50 shown. Expand all images
>> No. 376866
>>376864
So, wait.
Do you just treat it as a fetish, like I've heard some people do?
Or do you only ever feel any sexual excitation with underage folk?
>> No. 376868
Speaking of - I'm in favour of gay marriage.

But looking at it now and they now people saw it all back several decades back I just can't help but fear if this'll all end in making pedophilia legal in 60 years, or beastiality normal in less.
The way we demonize or shun that stuff now is how we used to Interracial marriage or Homosexuality.
So while I don't mean to say they're related, I do have to say I'm comparing the cases.
>> No. 376870
>>376868
but animals and children don't want to marry adults
>> No. 376871
>>376866
I can have sex with adults perfectly well. If I only ever interacted with adults, there wouldn't be an issue.
>> No. 376872
>>376868
The problem with that is that adults are equals. Kids and adults or animals and adults aren't.
>> No. 376876
>>376868
Kids and animals cannot consent. That's why pedophilia and bestiality are illegal, not because they're ~ewwww so gross~.
This really is like the most basic thing in the world, which makes me wonder why most right-wingers repeatedly fall back on the BUT PEOPLE WILL BE FUCKING THEIR DOGS IN THE STREETS excuse whenever gay marriage is brought up.
>> No. 376877
>>376872

All adults are equal. But some are more equal than others.

This is why it's a mess when there is an unbalance-of-power between two adults. A boss and an underling. A teacher and a student. A person of average/above-average intelligence and a person of below-average intelligence. Even, to some degree, a man and a woman. (And in case you think I am being sexist in that last one, I totally am. In modern society, women generally have power over men in a sexual relationship, and men generally allow it.) For the most part, there is always going to be one person dominant over another in a relationship. And if you think an animal or a child cannot ever hold power over an adult... you're an idiot. This isn't a one-way street. It is possible for a child to extort or manipulate an adult into sex. It's somewhat possible for an animal to rape an adult.

But I do not support adults marrying children or animals. There is only one point to marriage, and that is tax deductions. Animals and children do not pay taxes, so they have no need for such rights.
>> No. 376878
Speaking of beastiality, when I'm feeling ornery and none of my usual sources interest me I go to 7chan's /be/ or look for "alternative" sources. Only care for X on female, though. (As though that somehow makes it better.)
>> No. 376881
>>376864
I'm going to resist the urge to call you a sick fuck if you tell me you aren't actively doing anything about that and don't plan to in the future.

>>376877
>It is possible for a child to extort or manipulate an adult into sex.

Possible? Yes. But goddamn unlikely. And that would have to be one messed-up kid to begin with.

>There is only one point to marriage, and that is tax deductions.

Wow, someone's a cynic.
>> No. 376884
>>376872
There's also the fact kids aren't developed for sex, specially with adults. That's a good way for nature to say they're not meant to, to begin with.

>>376876
Not to defend it, but animals seem to be able to consent it well enough, taking the initiative to dry hump until you kick their ass and stuff, until they figure "no means no".
>> No. 376885
>>376877
I generalized to form a simple argument. If you want it with qualifiers: In the majority of cases, in a relationship between an average adult human and an average child or animal, the adult human will have an unfair advantage over the child or animal. This is different than relationships between 2 adult humans because society entrusts adult humans to take care of themselves and gives them the power to do so, to a reasonable extent. That's why any relationship between 2 adults is inherently different than a relationship between an adult and a child or animal.

Now quit being a pedantic dipshit, please.

>>376881
I read dirty stories. I'm fairly certain that's a 2.3 on the Sick-Fuck-O-Meter.
>> No. 376887
>>376884
That's not even close to the same thing. Animal instinct is not the same as two adults having a consensual sexual relationship. And not all animals are like that anyway, it's mostly dogs that like to hump whatever they can.

>>376885
Read all the dirty stories you want. So long as you never actually try to touch or otherwise do anything with a real child, that's fine by me. Or at least not as bad.
>> No. 376888
>>376884
>animals seem to be able to consent it well enough
It's not just about consent, it's about informed consent. There are many, many teen boys age 13-15 that would love to fuck their hot teacher, but that would be statutory rape. (In a few states it might not be statutory rape at 16-17, but only if contained within the state, and the school/public will still go after the teacher for other reasons.) It's the same reason that having sex with a drunk woman can be rape in many states, even if the woman consented at the time; the inebriation removes the possibility for informed consent.

Yes, there are many animals that take the initiative, but that doesn't make it okay. Because they can't possibly have an adult brain, they can't give informed consent, and so it's not okay. (Thought exercise: If adult human brains could be put into animals, fully operational as adult humans but able to fully control the animal body, would bestiality taboo no longer apply?)

Sage because this isn't a confession, nor anonymous.
>> No. 376889
Weirdly enough, I have the inverse problem.

I feel immense guilt for not being a sexual person. I find having a romantic or sexual relationship with anyone borderline scary, partially due to not knowing how to deal with my social anxiety.

I particularly don't understand incest or underaged fetishes. I've never seen my relatives in that way, and I don't find people under 16 to be attractive at all, because they lack developed sexual organs and an understanding of sex. But I've gotten a lot of flack for it online, being called closed-minded and being informed "but lolis help curb real pedophila", "nobody is having sex with real kids", and "incest is wincest". I wonder if I'm in the wrong here for kink-shaming.
>> No. 376890
>>376889
>I wonder if I'm in the wrong here for kink-shaming.
Yes.
As long as real living beings aren't being abused and no laws are being broken, there's no need to shame people for what they get their jollies to. It's not a conscious decision, no one wakes up after a couple dozen years of vanilla kinks and goes "I am gonna get a boner to a little girl today."
People can't help it. Does that mean it isn't weird? Fuck no. But generally people with weird-ass kinks know that just as much as anyone, so making them feel like shit for what gets them all hot and bothered is really just being kind of a douche.

Again though, this all applies as long as no one's actually molesting a third-grader, a mom isn't bumping uglies with her son, and no one's putting their dick in their dog. As long as they keep it fictional and no one's hurt, there's not really a problem.
>> No. 376891
>>376890
Good god you're so dogmatic.
>> No. 376892
>>376891
What do you mean?
>> No. 376895
>>376890
I'm not saying people can't enjoy it in a purely fictional sense. But I feel guilty when people say "But it's so hot, why don't /you/ like it?"

I've gotten borderline furious at myself because I spent all afternoon looking at various porn of various fetishes, and nothing did anything for me. I should be sexual. This should not make me scared. It's stupid. My psychologist even told me it was stupid and that I needed to get over it.
>> No. 376897
>>376895
I think the psychologist might be right on this. You don't have to be into weird sexual stuff, or normal sexual stuff, or even romance. The idea that you have to be into that stuff is poison. Just don't be judgmental when there's no harm involved and it's all good.

You really should let peer pressure get to you, besides.
>> No. 376899
>>376895
That's silly. How do you expect to get in the mood if you're all upset? Just relax.

..And it's really not a big deal if you don't instantly get turned on at the slightest thing, y'know.
>> No. 376900
>>376889
It's really, really average to find things like animals and children (and pain, and rape, and poop, and extreme body types, etc.) sexually offputting. Lolicon is gross to everyone except a small minority. I can see how you might lose perspective if you frequent places like 4chan, but it's really not normal to find prepubescent kids hot, especially when you're an adult. Your tastes in people are supposed to develop appropriately as you age (i.e. you can develop a crush on a girl in your class when you are both 13, but when you are 21, you would not find her 13-year-old self attractive anymore) but sometimes that doesn't happen. A more extreme version is when you aren't attracted to male or female bodies at all, but the non-sexualised androgyny that only children have. It's abnormal. Because pedophilia can cause major psychological damage in victims, it shouldn't be considered normal either. (That's another reason why child marriage is nothing like gay marriage: nobody's getting hurt when two consenting adults of the same sex marry one another. There's never been any scientific evidence to the contrary, but the nasty effects of adults having sex with kids is well-documented.)

And you're not "kink shaming" if you find something revolting lmao. Saying you don't like it or saying you don't want to see it isn't kink shaming either. Don't let other people tell you otherwise because they're wrong. Being sexually open to every kink is unusual--the reason why it's a kink, after all, is because such a small fraction of people find it hot. Congratulations, you're a totally normal person (at least sexually).
>> No. 376901
>>376889
>"but lolis help curb real pedophila"
>"nobody is having sex with real kids"
Well that's bullshit anyway. It just makes pedophiles more delusional that it's acceptable and they're poor misunderstood victims, when they see others spamming to make it seem like they're a majority, and making up excuses and arguments.
>> No. 376902
>>376900
>And you're not "kink shaming" if you find something revolting lmao. Saying you don't like it or saying you don't want to see it isn't kink shaming either.
Yeah this is true. Going "wow that is really gross to me, please keep your porn to yourself" or w/e isn't kink shaming. My earlier post was operating under the assumption that you knew what it was and were doing it.
>>376895
>I should be sexual.
Why?
Lots of people aren't sexual, but enjoy romance. Lots of people can't into romance but they're fine with sex. Lots of people don't care for either.
Trying to force something that you're clearly not interested in is just gonna make you unhappier.
>> No. 376904
>>376901
And, not to mention. Its comparable to a gateway drug. It just steers you into that direction while you're going deeper and deeper down the kinkhole.
I mean, dude's full of shit.
>> No. 376962
>>376904
> Its comparable to a gateway drug.
I see two main possibilities concerning pedophilia artwork:
1) It allows pedophiles a release from their urges so they're less likely to go after actual children, or
2) What you say, that it only intensifies the urges

Sadly, I cannot find any studies about this one way or the other. IMO, digital lolicon should be legal because it harms no actual person, in the same way that I believe most drugs should be legal. If the porn or the drugs cause the person to do something that actually harms someone, then it's on the person.

In addition, such acts only to go to repress pedophiles; while this is certainly not a good attribute, continually villainizing them will only make them more and more stressed and more likely to offend. Instead, an effort should be made to catch them early, and help them with therapy and such so that they can either get rid of such interests (if possible?) or at least find a better outlet for them that will keep them from going after children. (This is, again, similar to drugs.)
>> No. 376964
I'm good at displaying affection and attachment but it doesn't mean I feel any of it. It's not me trying to lie or something, I'm just a cuddly person and I like a lot. But I don't love or feel a need or anything.
>> No. 376965
also I found weird hentai on my boyfriend's computer

......I dont know if he actually gets off to this. I know he looks at a lot of strange shit on the internet because he thinks it's funny.
>> No. 376966
>>376962
...Or keeping them under proper vigilance so they won't get the chance (and maybe know it).
>> No. 376971
>>376965
What kind of stuff was it? Futa? Loli? Dragons fucking cars?
>> No. 376974
>>376962
You can't get rid of sexual preferences and kinks through therapy. They're so deeply ingrained that it's pretty much impossible to convince someone that what they find hot isn't hot anymore. Best you can do is convince them that society hates the act so much that they should never do it, or chemically sterilise them (which is what some pedophiles have actually asked for).
>> No. 376977
>>376974
>Best you can do is convince them that society hates the act so much that they should never do it
But that goes back to villainizing them before they've even done anything. This added pressure makes it more likely, not less, that they'll act on the urges. Therapy/support groups can help control urges or find alternative outlets that don't harm anyone. It's far better than shaming them and hoping for the best.
>> No. 376979
>>376964
Modern expectations of affection are really weird. It's like everything must mean something and must always escalate to greater heights.

>>376966
>>376974
So, you plan to make sure that no one comes forward seeking help and that things continue forward as usual? Because if your only options are 24/7 monitoring and chemical castration, that's what is going to happen. It's already obvious that society hates pedophilia. Child molesters are on the list of people no one feels bad about the death of. It shouldn't be normalized, but god damn do you guys spectacularly fail at thinking of ways to actually improve the situation. You act like they're wolves, rather than people who need to change. I'm with Autotune on this one. Treat it like drug addiction or any other mental illness until someone actually commits a crime, and then make it seem like a good idea to turn themselves in.
>> No. 376988
>Anonymous Awkward Confession Thread
>Anonymous

Y'all tripfriends be doin it wrong.
>> No. 376990
>>376899
>>376900
>>376902
>>376901
Thank you. I have friends who chewed me out for not accepting all fetishes, or for not taking nudes and posting them online, and I guess I wasn't sure what normal sexual behavior was, and I thought I was being too much of a prude or something.

I guess what I'm going to try to do now is not guilt trip myself when I do get aroused, and see what happens?
>> No. 376993
>>376990
You have some really shitty friends. I can see how they'd confuse you.
>> No. 377012
>>376990
>I have friends who chewed me out for not accepting all fetishes, or for not taking nudes and posting them online

They are morons, tell them to go fuck themselves and when they whine, say you figured they'd appreciate it, since they're obviously so sex-obsessed.
>> No. 377020
>>376971
idk what futa is (not gonna google) but it was mostly incest and older women with young guys

'oh yeah toro-chan,fuck the womb that you came from'
>> No. 377025
>>376889
Really? Like you should find stuff hot but nothing really gets your motor running? I've heard tales of asexuals but I've never really encountered one. I know my arousal can go from zero to 60 in 5 seconds flat, so it's hard to imagine someone who just never has to deal with the "sexual interruption", so to speak.

It doesn't really "kink shame" if you don't find something hot. That's why they're called fetishes; a relatively low percentage are going to be into them or even find them mildly arousing. Just try not to tell them they're a horrible person or whatever for liking something, you're just not into that thing. That said, there are certain kinks that raise the subtle question of consent, legality, and injury.

>>376901
>>376904
pedophilia, on 4chan at least, does seem to act as a kind of extended fantasy for a lot of dudes who seem like they've kind of given up on normal relationships, one way or another. The incidence of people really seeming serious and earnest about it has seemed to shift over time, the modern boards seeing it as an aberration, not a mainstay. Which is good, as most of it appears to be escapist nonsense or trolling in normal dudes, exacerbated by the availability of smut. But even /co/ has its' share of underage characters that get a... "mature" treatment.

Incest... I should preface this with Incest and pedophilia always being terrible ideas in some form. For every cutsey "siblings experiment" story there's like 10 actual stories of people horribly damaged by it. But within the realm of kink and masturbation, I always thought the draw in incest was more physical, more about it being an older woman than that woman being some kind of analog for your mother, and that the relationships depicted weren't especially the draw, although the thrill of taboo often lends a certain edge to things. Incest doesn't necessarily disrupt physical attraction; older women or older can often be very attractive for both looks and experience, and incest stories just seem like a cheap way of enabling the buggering.

tl;dr it's good to be open to things and a lot of these fetishes are harmless so long as they're kept solely in the realm of fantasy. If you've found your significant others' porn stache, it might actually help to talk to them about what's in there and find out why they think it's hot, and maybe work some of that reasoning into your erotic play. (warning: this may lead you to more than you ever knew about the person in question)

But don't feel ashamed if you don't find something sexually arousing or necessarily get the kink. You can be accepting of fetishes without having to practice them yourself, and it' good to recognize the boundaries of fantasy for kinks, as many kinks pursued in earnest can lead to very fucked up situations.

And, don't listen to your friend about feeling bad about not uploading nudes. As ubiquitous as it is and as much as I do love it when any girl wants my attention like that, it's your choice, your body, and your private life. Some people like being seen, just the thought of a lot of random strangers pleasuring themselves to that person, they get off on that. But not everyone does, and personally, I prefer girls who want me to view them like that when I look at that kind of smut. That Facebook/nudes stalking thing people do creeps me out. I mean, obviously people on facebook fuck, but if you don't want to be viewed as such then I'd say that prerogative should override the sharing of smut. It's not the person pictured's fault, it's generally the asshole who took the video. And if you don't want to be a part of that, I'd actually say that's smarter than not these days.
>> No. 377036
>>377020
Ah. /ss/. For the man that's felt cheated out of a screw with his 5th grade teacher.
Don't worry, thats actually common. Its all an insertion fantasy.
The incest thing's not so much, but it works in the same vein.
>> No. 377039
>>377036
>Don't worry, thats actually common. Its all an insertion fantasy.
Other guy here, always figured it was that... but damned if I'd bring that up and defend it on a talk about this. A lot of times they just draw MILFs so curvy it gets... difficult to let go of it.
>> No. 377042
>>376990
In all seriousness, get better friends. What shitheads.

My friends don't tend to understand why sex/porn/their kinks don't interest me either, but they're not rude assholes about it. imo the second somebody tells you that you're broken for being disgusted by lolicon is the second you should kick them to the curb. Especially if it's lolicon. Or dubcon. Or incest.
>> No. 377045
Thread has seriously derailed. Direct all further discussion about loli/sexuality/etc. to >>377043. (Remember that you can reference posts across threads, so if you want to reply to a post in here, include that post link in your reply to the other thread.)

You may resume posting your anonymous confessions (sexual confessions are alright, but not discussion/reaction as such).
>> No. 377046
I spent a month homeless and eating out of the garbage. I used a discarded plastic bottle for water and just wandered around town. It was the happiest month of my life.
>> No. 377213
Have been severely depressed for a period of roughly ten years, starting when I was 13, during which I basically had to put my life on hold. Have tried pretty much all the medications and treatments available to no effect.
After ECT and TMS failed to help, I've tried to work hard at volunteering and helping the needy, but I'm still not capable of feeling a sense of satisfaction, fulfilment, accomplishment, or happiness, either for myself or for others.
I wish I could stop being so selfish, and be able to feel something for others regardless of how I feel about myself, but I don't really know how. It's like I lost the ability.
I'm kinda drifting now, but I can't tell how much longer I can hold out anymore.
>> No. 377214
>>377213
Stop worrying about it and just be.
>> No. 377225
>>377214
That's all I've really been able to do for a number of years now. I've just been "being," or existing.
Thanks regardless.
>> No. 377447
I've had people question my validity and my fan...interest on things to the point where I don't know if I know who I am anymore. Maybe I'm doing something to honestly be nice to them, because I want them to be happy, and they tell me I'm being fake or I have ulterior motives, or I'm pretending to like something, and I start second-guessing everything I do as a result.
>> No. 377452
>>377447
All you can do is answer those questions honestly at this point. Tell the class, are all your actions pure and true?
>> No. 377454
>>377452
When I get into a fandom or decide "I'd like to be friends with that person", it's because I like it, or because I like them. I could do things just to be popular, but I've always decided against them.

I only started questioning my motives because other people questioned them. I only thought I was stupid when other people told me I was stupid.
>> No. 377455
>>377454
Then you know. Good job. Get a gold star.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason