>> |
No. 115295
>>115286
Perhaps you're unfamiliar with trolling techniques, so I'll give you a 101.
First, you take a show (or a season of a show), then make a bland, over-generalization about it that is entirely negative but with shavings of points people could believably come to like, oh, say,
>It's all just fun kid's games and boyfriends and doing whatever a powerful guy who isn't her father or Tenzin tells her to do.
Note how this ignores, for one, her not really having much fun, and the points regarding Korra's struggles regarding independence as has been articulated in above posts. And that she rebuffs Tarrlock in short shrift and often goes on to do her own thing without proper consultation.
If you feel like it, you can also follow up with an obviously wrong interpretation regarding character motivation and identity that can STILL be excused as just not thinking too hard about the meaning of words, like:
>Her motivation is "be the Avatar". She may as well have said "I'm going to be me"
Having made something like this on an Avatar board, you're guaranteed to get replies. The rest is simple- just challenge them to explain why it isn't that (even though, as we can note it has already been explained why it isn't in this very thread), and then just keep on sticking to your initial story, disregard points to the contrary or- even better if you can- just use them as examples to back up your own theory. For instance:
>This is not how a character with internal motivation or inner strength or strength as a character in the sense of having well-defined traits would act and the criticism to which I have been responding asserted that Korra is such a character; which falls apart with ten seconds of analysis.
Because you see, other people are obliged to think 'Well, maybe he's just stupid and genuinely looking for information' because they believe in good netiquette and keep on at it, which eventually leads to the entire discussion and argument revolving around you, and you can happily continue to piss fans of the series off ad infinitum.
That's exactly what was happening here. There were no concrete examples as to her 'lack of character' or compelling arguments from his side beyond opinions. No 'discussion', as such, was taking place (or possible, considering the opening framework) regarding differing motivations. What's more, Korra's flaws and frustrations about her independence were being seen as inherently negative and un-characterful, rather than the character traits of a flawed person.
You could say that the anon absolutely fails at subtext, but even in that case someone else describing points to him isn't going to change anything either, and the end result is the same. We have to infer intent and do what's best for the board as a whole- not let it swing from right-sided anger to left-sided anger, but keep everything in moderation.
i.e. Moderate it.
And now you know why they were banned.
|