plus4chan [
/
/
/
/
]
plus/co/ [
/
/
/
/
/
/
]
Style [
/
/
/
/
/
]
Site Suggestions

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply

 Posting a reply to post #415
Name
Email
Subject  
Message
File 
Password  

  • New updates as of : 08/20/08

File: 120806994361.jpg-(12.72KB, 378x301, casualty-care_clip_image004.jpg)
415 No. 415
A few suggestions regarding /n/:

* Set the page limit to 10 and, like in 4chan, make so that old threads are automatically purged when the 10 pages are filled.

* Replace the sticky.

* Modify the rules a bit. Here's a suggestion:
1. No illegal content allowed. This includes, but is not limited to, child pornography, terrorist threats and warez.
2. No spam. This includes raiding this board.
3. All threads created must be related to a current or ongoing event and include a relevant link.
4. Replies will never be moderated unless they are in breach of the first two rules.

Violating rules #1 and #2 will result in a ban. Violating rule #3 will result in the thread in question being deleted.


The current ones give way too much latitude and allow for threads that are basically all "lol obama's a racist discuss" or "lol look at Chelsea's weird face rofl xd!". I think these rules will allow us to have a somewhat intelligent news board while upholding the ideal of free speech. I hope you will at least consider my suggestion.

* Consider the banners submitted by the libfags. There was some bawwwwing recently but he did have a point. Those banners could attact more people.

I know you're probably out on vacation and that plus4chan isn't your whole life (that'd be kinda sad) so whenever you read this is good.

No. 419
Update:
* Set the page limit to infinity, so when we are raided we just purge their shit and ban the retards like nothing happened.

No. 425
1. No illegal content allowed.
2. No spam. This includes raiding and flooding this board (Yes, even with news) and threads with a poor summary.
3. All threads created must be related to a current or ongoing event and include a relevant link.
4. Replies will never be moderated unless they are in breach of the first two rules.

Violating rules #1 and #2 will result in a ban. Violating rule #3 will result in the thread in question being deleted.


No. 427
There should be some kind of machine that kicks Pepe in the ass whenever he uses Mod powers.

Not that I think Pepe is doing a bad job; I'm just in favour of an automated Pepe asskicking machine.

No. 428
The mods/janitors should have been kept anonymous and shouldn't have been able to openly say what privileges they have. Now you have principle one person going around flaunting his powers.

The last 5 replies should be shown instead of the last 3.

Oh also, don't change the limit to infinity just because some spammer wants to piss off pepe.

No. 430
>>428
So what if the janitors are out? What's the harm?
If we have a page limit it will be very easy for a raidfag to fill our board and kill all the threads.

No. 431
>>430
yeah, we wouldn't be able to simply make more

No. 432
>>431
The impact of a raid would be reduced to zero. And back to >>428
Remember Snacks?

No. 433
>>432
Snacks was admin though, a bit different than a lowly janitor

No. 434
>>433
I'M HURT ANON!

No. 435
>>428
I don't mind the idea of force-anon for mods, but the cats already out of the bag.

>>432
Until the site grinds to a halt because we're keeping each and every post. Moot doesn't limit page count because he hates threads, he does it so SQL won't die.

Also, you aren't the same Pepe from /r9k/, are you?

No. 437
>>435
Yes I am. But you do have a point there.

No. 438
its not as though raids happen all the time... pepe had to put in 10 seconds of honest work and he's already trying to find a way to get out of it.

No. 439
>>435
Yes he's trying to ruin /r9k/, this /n/, and also tra/n/sportation as well.

No. 440
i cant believe some tripfag who showed up 3 weeks before /n/ got shut down is the janitor

No. 441
>>439
I'm trying to ruin/troll /r9k/ and transportation. I hardly post in /n/ this days and no one has complained about my management style yet. I only delete spam (ie one line subject) threads which generate no discussion and the occasional raid.

No. 442
>>441
then why are there always 4 one line animefag threads on the front page?

No. 443
>>442
Because he's here 24/7, I'm not :(

No. 458
>>443
I dunno why you're giving the sad face, you reply to half of them.

No. 462
I think that spammer is a troll, a successful one btw.

No. 463
>>441
Why do you want to ruin /r9k/? It's one of the best boards out there now. Sure, it's still a lot of emo and bullshit threads, but it's much slower than /b/ and lacks the spam of /b/.

No. 465
>>463
At first I wanted to ruin it because I got the impression that it was full of PC fags (and it is, just not as much as I thought). Now I'm just another namefag. Well subjectfag.

No. 526
bump

[Return]


Delete Post  

News
Rules
plus4chan [
baw
/
durp
/
n
/
rad
/
sug
]
plus/co/ [
a
/
co
/
coc
/
cog
/
draw
/
jam
/
pco
]
Style [
/
/
/
/
/
]
The site has been updated.
Please clear your cache,
or refresh until this disappears.