WAIT, ANONEX.


We need to immortalize this /n/ somehow.

It's the best /n/ could ever hope to be.

Moot will be an Obamatard faggot and close it down just like he did last time.

>>199660
Then we need to speed up to process and get all the real /n/ewsmen in here.

>>199659
I'm almost willing to bet money that >>199660 is correct.

But on the off chance he isn't, I guess there's no harm in leaving the board up locked for posterity's sake.

Or somehow providing access to the 10,521 deleted threads that have been automatically archived since October 2008.

Links to completely random dead threads:
Warning for America from South Africa:
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/49701.html
Obama: Constitution Fatal Flaw
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/56951.html
Japan 'should develop nuclear weapons'
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/67886.html

>>199662
You can do that?

I love you. Also, are you posting on the new /n/?

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/4337


athens and some other +/n/ewsmen are there discussing about this.

You should post there, anonex.

>>199664
>>199666
I never have much to add to these conversations; I'm just your host.

An aside: this may not matter much to /n/ with /new/ up, but within the next month(ish) I'll be switching to completely new/upgraded imageboard software, as well as an updated theme.

>>199669
Looks... weird. I hope we can get some different themes like 4chan has example (YOTSUBA B, Burichan, ect).

I actually like this clean classic look we've stayed with over the years.

That format looks like it's full of unfamiliar unnecessary clutter.

I don't actually browse the other boards here but what do the other posters seem to think?

>>199669
I think you're just a host but don't you go to any of the other boards and post there? I mean, you obviously post or have posted on 4chan at one point to influence the chan layout.

>>199658
+/n/ > /new/

But I like this place better, with the soothing blue and the fact that our discussions get archived for posterity.

>>199675
Also the maximum length of each post on 4chan /new/ is ridiculously low.

>>199674
>>199675

This.

>>199671
I like it, personally.

Well I'm multitabbing between /new/ /n/ /a/ /k/ /co/ /g/ /ck/ /sci/ /lit/

/r9k/ has lost all its usefulness. moot's attempt at original content died along with old /n/ and old /a/ during the Eternal Newfag Summer of 07.

/n/'s cancers =
Republicans
Conservatives
Neoconservatives
White supremacist (see all of the above)
Zionists
Racists and Bigots (Again, see all of the above)

>>199681
If you took all of those out of /n/, there'd just be like. Two guys. Maybe three.

Fuck 4chan. I used to want old /n/ back but now I'm hostile to the idea. I'm staying right here.

Funnily enough, probably half the threads on its front page right now are race related. This isn't going to last long.

/n/ has really gone downhill in the last month with the athens clones infestation.

moot picked the worst possible time to recreate /new/... it's almost as if he wants it to fail.

>the athens clones infestation.

What?

>>199686
butthurt

mods are newfags, board is doomed

>>199694
Is it a permaban?
Also you should not mess with moot his butthurt knows no bounds.

>>199696
5 days, just for a toon.
Haven't seen any real Fronters post yet. It's like they picked out some mods from a Chucky Cheese.

>>199694
Dude, just IPconfig that shit or get a proxy.


They banned me 15 times now for hurting their precious Obama but they gave up eventually.

This is hilarious.

More anti Obama nigger agenda and /new/ will be canned along with all the /new/fags who don't know true /n/ protocol.

Man Anonex, you are a cool admin. Much cooler than moot.

I used to think I'd rather /n/ had more libfags.

Then moot brought back /n/... Jesus Christ. These people don't know how to argue or debate, they just bitch, bitch and call you names. That's it. They've spent the best part of the past however many hours complaining about racism and herp derp Stormfront. Sure there's a lot of trolling and off-topic discussion, but it's not really any worse than on the other boards.

I just checked it out.
Place is /b/ with a focus on racism.

4chan's /new/ is equal parts /r2k/ and /b/. It's nothing like the old /n/.

LOL Anonex. We hardly ever see you. Dinner is never cooked and nsfw posts collect like dust bunnies under the toilet. You're like a housewife who takes hubby for granted. But our old flame Moot looks us up and suddenly you're on the bed with your legs in the air.

Anonex: ONLY close down plus4chan's /n/ -if- activity here dies down significantly. I thibk everyone, regardless of where they stand politically, that our /n/ will be the superior of the two.

>>199703
/new/ doesn't even follow the newsboard format. I know there's an ongoing debate as to whether blogs and the like count as "news" here, but on /new/ they don't even have that much. Every single thread originates from an off-topic troll post.

>>199671
It'll be completely customizable. You can have the old/classic style if you like, but once you see the new crap in action you might change your mind.

>>199672
I mean I don't have much to add to any of this conversation; I was never really an /n/ user. I was in /b/ very early on until it turned to a flood of shit, then /co/ when it was added.
>to influence the chan layout
Buh?

>>199708
I leave most of the moderation to pepe (who seems to come and go). Every time I decide I should add someone new to replace him he reappears, ha. And last time I tried moderating /n/ I failed miserably, as you may or may not recall.

>>199711
Will do.

You dipshits do realize, you can post both in /new/ and in /n/, right?

Don't proactively try to kill /new/ just yet.

>>199718
/new/ is already dead.

I've been trolling it with Obama threads like the fist of the North Star.

Holy shit liberals, what have I been telling you for all this time? You bitched and moaned and complained, and that's what killed old /n/. Do us all a favor and just fuck off to moot's egalitarian liberal paradise already, leave this board forever.

I certainly hope this board stays up. It would really suck if the only decent news board was 420chan's and its slow as hell.

>>199717
Do you have any plans on releasing source? This is by far the best image board software around, at least from the front-end.

How long will 4chan /new/ be up?

[ ] 1 month
[ ] 1 week
[ ] 1 day
[ ] 1 hour

>>199724
Maybe a month. I think there's a chance moot wouldn't want to cave too quickly or else it'll look too much he got trolled into shutting it down.

>>199726
This.

>>199722
I'm a client-side guy; HTML, CSS, javascript, some flash, etc. That and actually designing. I'm /sort of okay/ at PHP and etc but it's not my strong suit, and that's why the site's progress has stalled.

The back end of the site is, presently, heavily modified Kusaba v1.0.3. But the modifications are 90% just reorganizing things to make the front end how I want it.

I'm currently in talks with some dashing, mysterious stranger who is writing his own imageboard software, and it's going to have all the bells and whistles I've been too inadequate to add myself, enabling me to focus 100% on client-side crap.

My stuff, I have no plans to release the source, but it is by nature 'released'; the client side stuff is free for you to read to figure out how it's done if you want to implement similar. His stuff, up to him. Don't know what his plans are.

I'm trying to kill /new/fags as hard as I can.


It's inferior to +/n/ in every single way imaginable.

You can't even post full stories. How gay is that?

moot desperately needs to put an /r9k/ style robot on /new/.
Otherwise that place will be nothing more then NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER forever.

I'm already laughing at all the Obamatard butthurt.

Our /n/ has a large amount of Britfags but there's a large amount of Britfag butthurt on /new/

>>199730
moot is scared of walls of text.

That's why he made an imageboard, so he could fit all his poor wit remarks and jokes into a single imagemacro that even a 12 year old can comprehend.

>>199720
I love you.

I'm contributing right now. It's hilarious how butthurt the kids who voted for him just because he's black are.

FUUUUUUUCK

As much as I hate to say it, we really need ISN and ISM back to do some damage to Moot's bullshit. All of us at least hate egalitarianism.

It seriously wouldn't surprise me if ISM has been arrested for CP or something though.

>>199749
>I am a giant faggot.

>>199750
>I am a giant faggot

Is that you Keith Olberman?

>>199749
Agreed.


Where the fuck are they?

>>199749
We're trying to get this shit canned. Post as an anon and get full racist on all the butthurt libtards. Just "troll", stop using logical arguments and conventional logic. It doesn't work against the libtards. They're too retarded for it. I know you're not smalltime, so try harder.

btw is there just no nnnp rule or convention on 4chan /new/

>>199757
I've been arbitrarily saging and and spamming threads with NNNP, even the one or two that appear to have articles.

>>199759
Good work.

>>199757

I've been trying to start it again. The best thing we can do is try to make it work. Sage NNNP threads and post articles in the 'Story/Link' format.

>>199763
Protip: we don't want /new/ to succeed

>>199755
>Implying that Conservatards have ever, in the entire history of /n/, used a logical argument.

>>199766

LOL, the mods singled out athens' thread from all of the shit troll posts for deletion. I wonder of athens was banned.

>>199773
He will be back.

>>199772

Typical conservatard, stealing someone else's ideas and passing it off as their own, even though it doesn't make any sense when they use it.

Even if /new/ isn't taken down, I'd like this board to stay up. /new/ is worse than /b/.

Fuck, we need ISM back.

/new/ will never be good. mootles insentience on no trolling will kill the board, because in his opinion anyone who isn't a giant faggy liberal is a troll.

>>199787
.>>199749
I agree, ISM and ISN add nice layers of trolling to /n/, its hard to argue with people who agree with you

Shit did 4chan just go down?

>>199795
Yeah not working for me, I miss /v/ already.

What the fuck.


Is /n/ down right now? Also, alt are you posting there bro?

I'm just spamming lol niggers and racist arguments until moot gets so butthurt he cans it.

>>199798
I wonder if overloading the report system could also annoy him.

>>199799
I'm already doing that but I need more help.

btw, got one of the mods fired already for abusing his powers.

His crying on the 4chan IRC was fucking hilarious. Fucking /new/fag mods wouldn't last an hour on the real old /n/.

/new/ is too big to fail

http://status.4chan.org/

Maybe moot will just can /new/ now. VICTORY!

  >>199808
This is something every /n/igger can be proud of, whether he's a conservatard, Obamatard, stormfag, libfag, or... hell, even an obnoxious chink like ISN.

Video related, our victory hymn!

>>199810
holy shit, that song is awesome and I usually don't care for anime shit.

>>199810
hear hear!

What??? No, don't shut us down. Here we have freedom of speech, there we clearly won't. We don't need that faggot's charity.

Plus I'm unable to open /new/, maybe he banned all of Mexico from that board?

>>199821
Nope it's down in america too I think the site is just down.

The entire site is down, bro.

I think some faggots are DDoSing or maybe /new/ is down forever.

>>199824
All boards are down since it's on the same fucking server.

>>199826
Well duh.

But I really hope they take down all the new boards.

Everything has taught me that all of 4chan is beyond redemption.

We can never go back to pre 2007 4chan. There's too many butthurt kids.

>>199828
Well, kids who don't know how to fucking lurk and just start shitposting right away not knowing shit.

>>199821
UK here, yeah it's down

Fuck, if I don't troll libtards soon I'm going to throw my monitor out the window.

>>199828
domain =/= server. lrn2 round robin DNS.

>>199826
Most of 4chan is fine other than /b/ and /r9k/.

High levels of fail, moot.

Less than a day after you put up the new boards and niggertits goes down.

>>199835
If it stays down forever, we should start dancing.

>>199838
We need a pizza party if moot tears down /new/, even tho that's pretty much the most likely thing to happen anyway.

YOU MEAN THERE SHOULDN'T BE A BOARD OVERFLOWING WITH RACIST COMMENTS???? OMG WHAT A LEFTIST! THE HORROR!

>>199834
Since I'm obvious dealing with a master here, mind helping instead of insulting others?

>>199840
Boundaries on civility, I can understand. No slurs, insults, etc.

But to say that certain topics or opinions (that the races are not equal in every way and that this ought to shape public and foreign policy, say) are taboo is simply bizarre. Having become accustomed now to speaking my mind here on /n/, I find going elsewhere on the Internet positively Orwellian.

>>199840
This is what moot thinks but he's a butthurt Obamatard faggot.

Anyway, the racism and trolling has always made /n/ what it was. It's one of the best things about /n/. It always has been.

http://plus4chan.org/boards/baw/res/196229.html

>>199843
What are you talking about? Saying that blacks are statistically more likely to be criminals is RACIST.

Although most libfags will usually forgive you for saying that if you make a jab at the war on drugs right after.

>>199841
Round robin DNS allows sites to have multiple IP addresses per domain. This is usefull if a site is too large for one server or to lower latency in other bits of the world, i.e. servers on multiple continents. It is also useful for DDoS mitigation, gateway servers can handle all initial connects and act effectively as firewalls for the main server(s).

>>199845
>The fact that anyone who is considered even vaguely decent by normal society wouldn't even go within ten feet of your ass is obviously a LIBURAL CONSPIRACY

What's always funny about this line is that /n/ is absolutely free of roneryfaggotry (in contrast to /baw/ obviously (the name says it all) and /r9k/, of course. I've not once observed a single poster on /n/ blame the niggers, the Jews or anyone else for the fact if they are single.

>>199846
Having data to back up statements that seem racist makes them fact too even if they are racist.

Niggers are indeed less intelligent than all other races and are more likely to commit crimes.

>>199849
The chinks sure like to blame the whites for it tho.

Just look at ISN and Asiafinest faggotry.

>>199850
Amazing what 200 years of eugenics selecting for physical strength and stupidity will do.

This thread is important and related to your arguments about ronery

http://plus4chan.org/boards/baw/res/196229.html

/n/'s supposed to be a place where, among other things, stormfags and libfags can finally duke it out with no holding back. Of course there's going to be racism. That's part of freedom of speech.

>>199852
I swear it's every second fucking thread over there is about WM/AF. AF Lounge and Love and Relationshit are naturally the worst boards for this.

That whole forum is like a giant /r9k/ for Azn manchildren.

>>199854
Now THAT'S racist. A few days ago, I would have had you pegged as a liberal too. ;___;

>>199857
Well it would explain ISN's butthurt.

>>199859
How is pointing out that slave owners killed intelligent slaves and bred strong ones racist?

>>199857
AsiaFinest is a fucking embarrassment. The funniest part is all the posters who try to sound like ghetto niggers the way they type. Why, oh why...

>>199854
Niggers keep their own vicious cycle of stupidity and never letting go or moving on tho. They'll never truly succeed in this world when basically everything wrong or bad about them is their own fault which they should be have fixed on their own instead of blaming others for all of life's problems illogically.

Citing slavery has always been one of the most stupid things I've ever heard... Fact remains that most whites never owned a slave, a lot defended black rights, and a lot more came as legal immigrants to America from Europe seeking the American dream as a land of opportunity, having absolutely nothing to do with niggers and their butthurt.

But the liberal media will never admit this...

>>199863
I agree slavery is no longer the problem for in blacks, the problem is black culture. I was joint pointing out why they are dumber than other races.

>>199856
You do know that there's like 5 people on /n/ right? 6 max.

>>199864
I have apparently forgotten how to speak English.

>I agree slavery is no longer the problem for blacks, the problem is black culture. I was just pointing out why they are dumber than other races.

>>199865
I'd say there are at least 7-8 just at varied times.

Um, keep this board. 4chan is known for crashing and slowing down often.

>>199864
That argument doesn't hold water because we have a continent called Africa and while we did colonize some of them, we didn't forcefully bred all of them like that at all because it's fucking impossible.

What niggers need to remember is that they sold their nigger "brothas" to US. They enslaved their own regularly and STILL do. Spoils of war, ect.

Liberals will never admit countries were better under white colonization and control as well. Their mindless sympathy is pathetic.

Another thing you have to remember is that a lot if not all black Americans have white ancestry.

Another awful truth, if they really were that way like you said then they really are genetically inferior. There's no saving them. Most liberals would argue something like sociological or economical even tho all the studies about races in white families are agianst it.

>>199868
No shit, Sherlock. It's not just about down-time, this board is way better in general. Also do not advertise plus4chan /n/ on 4chan, I saw someone write a comment about it a while, do you really want this place to grow in numbers from those fucktards who can't even post an article correctly?

>>199865
Really? I thought /n/ only gets like 4 unique IPs a month.

>>199871
Honestly, I'd rather have more people on /n/ than none at all.

If we had some actual high level trolls and intelligent posters... There's just really nothing here making people STAY.

I also haven't seen Lord British or whatever the fuck he calls himself around. Where is he? Thegamigoober whatever should be here too.

>>199871
This.

A few newfags at a time are fine, but if everyone on /new/ reads the sticky and comes here when moot inevitably shitcans /n/ews again, we're FUCKED.

Here, there's some NNNP and faggotry but it's all a bit of a laugh and not out of control. Also having seen what a 4chan /n/ looks like again you realise that post quality here is on average very high, despite what the naysayers think.

/new/ is exactly what /n/ shouldn't become.

Should we mirror +/n/ submissions to /new/? We got some quality posts and we could measure moot's response a bit.

Oh shit, 4chan is back up.

http://boards.4chan.org/new/

Lets help get /new/fag canned again. It's a terrible poor excuse for news compared to here.

>>199877
Agreed.

I'm ignoring everything you guys say and posting links to from +/n/ to /new/

Oh well, enjoy the quality drop.

>>199875
NO

>>199870
My argument that black culture is the main source of trouble for blacks doesn't hold water?

Africans on average have higher IQ's than black Americans. Africa's current chaos is not unique in history. Just look at Europe post roman empire, or more recently the Balkans post USSR. The only reason the wars in the Balkans has stopped is a large international military presence.

>>199883
When did you go dark inside?

>>199888
I couldn't deal with the loneliness and emptiness of our beloved +/n/.

Mods on /new/ are deleting actual news posts while leaving other blatant NNNP there.

What the fuck.

There are currently 107 unique IPs on /n/.

>>199875 here.

I just got banned from /new/, I posted a thread on SA rape case, an Obama meter thread and a racist one on Haiti. I also replied "moot confirmed for libertard" to the sticky thread.

Also their Banned page is down so I have no fucking idea what exactly I was banned for. BTW does anyone know how to report mod abuse?

>>199896 here.

Good god, look at this shit.

So I've only looked at /r9k/ once or twice. Is it really full of whiny liberals? I would have thought 4chan was mostly independents/trolls

>>199900
like half of it is relationshit crap and 1/4th was the advice stuff, moot created the /adv/ board to seperate it from /r9k/

/sci/ has twice as many posts as /new/

I doubt Moot's ever met an actual black person anywhere besides an anime convention.

>>199906
ironically, /sci/ has twice as many trolls too.


That board is basically RELIGION VS SCIENCE VS TROLLS

>>199907
Sup, GHF.

You missed a bunch of intense gay marriage threads on /new/

>>199887
>Africans on average have higher IQ's than black Americans.

Wat?

No they don't.

>>199910
Yes they do, haven't you seen them speak? They have proper grammar and even eloquence.

>>199910

Get your ass back on /n/, athens.


we need to burn it to the ground

the mass media has gone from being mainly news reports to a roughly 50-50 split between news reporting and the opinion of pundits. the youth of today can't tell the difference between the two anymore.

>>199917
It's been shit for longer than that, under slightly different dynamics. Just read this.

>>199917
liberal media

>>199897
Nice IP address bro.

/n/ I know we may fight from time to time, right vs left and all that. But I think I stand for all of us when I say that we are beyond a shadow of a doubt better than /new/. We enjoy free speech, properly formated news postings and hell we're just plain more fun to be around. Never change /n/ never change.

>>199912

That's because the ones escaping to America are the smart ones.

>>199941
>properly formated
this mainly

they dian an awesome job restructuring the boards

>>199941
That's because the ones escaping from 4chan are the smart ones.

Anonex at the very least the board needs to remain up for when 4chan itself meets the shitter. Beyond that, I expect people to still post here and that will only increase as their terrible mods purge the BAD PEOPLES on an hourly basis.

Anyways: Thanks for all the fish.

  this video sums it up

/n/ > /new/

>>200000
/n/ wants to see itself like that?

Also failget

>>199909
Did anyone mention that homosexual marriage is a good thing because it has the highest rates of domestic violence?

>>200000
butthurt get

>>200010
>>200014
I said this /n/ is better than /new/ what's not to get?

lul 4chan has been down

>>200020

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/14998

wtb backup

>>200025
Fuck man, stopped advertising plus4chan there, nobody wants the fags to come here, seriously just fuck off.

>>199802
>btw, got one of the mods fired already for abusing his powers.

>His crying on the 4chan IRC was fucking hilarious. Fucking /new/fag mods wouldn't last an hour on the real old /n/.

Lol, seriously? I'm on #4chan all the time. Who did moot fire?

Moot is less fair and balanced than Alan Greenspan

gb/2 4chan, niggers

>>200075
gb2/baw/

Well, apparently the idiot who banned me for 3 days is--according to another mod--someone who has been a mod since the beginning of the site. The mod also thinks that culture of old /n/ was /stormfront/.

I told him why he didn't ban anyone on the /new/ for "/b/ material" but he didn't reply. He also thinks that there is nothing wrong with the ban reason "/b/ material stays in /b/."

>>200077
Lol, butthurt libtard mod.

I want to ask some other /n/iggers to submit some replies/threads to /new/ to see if they get banned. If you get banned you should absolutely reply in this sticky with an image of the banpage and some explanation.

>>200082
I wouldn't worry

We can IPconfig/proxy that shit.

I've been banned 10 times in a row but I evaded all of them and they finally gave up. Feels good, man.

>>200083
Yeah, what I'm talking about is to see if they're butthurt over /n/ posts, from my experience they are. I'm currrently using a free VPN.

VICTORY

>>200120
Fag that can't recognise fake moot.

>>199907

moot's from NYC, I doubt he could avoid meeting black people even if he wanted to.

>>200130
And JEWWWSSSSSSSS

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/20414

That stupid chink gweilofag is shitting up another thread, Good Lord I wish I could hate him to death.

There's a lot more news on /new/ right now. Is it because all the kiddies aren't home yet?

>>200152
This thread is awesome. Makes me miss ISN.

;_;

>>200162

( ´ _>`)

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/22753

LOL

Why is /new/ NSFW if he expects people not to post "offensive" material? Along with the sticky that practically taunts people to not do as it says with its wacky little weeaboo image, eliminating any sense of seriousness for the board. I believe Moot wants what is happening. Is he compiling a list of "racist" IPs to send to some contact he has in the Obama administration? Will we all eventually be accused of hate crimes if we continue posting there?

>>200204
>Is he compiling a list of "racist" IPs to send to some contact he has in the Obama administration?
Yeah, mate. THAT'S what he's doing.

>>200204
>>200205
Watch, your tinfoil hat might fall off!

r water" Why would the Haitians do this?

http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/auknj/yesterday_they_threw_water_bottles_back_at_us_and/

  Tyd om te trek

I hope this doesn't go anywhere. /new/ is more like 420chan's /pol/ than it is the /n/ of 2007 that I had so much fun on. The whole board is blatant NNNP rather than the NNNP disguised as news that I'm used to.

>>200230
They're starting to post wnd and such. Give it time and soon will come moonbattery, rense, and infowars.

> I leave most of the moderation to pepe (who seems to come and go). Every time I decide I should add someone new to replace him he reappears, ha.
That's what happens when you hire a Mexican. :D

> And last time I tried moderating /n/ I failed miserably, as you may or may not recall.
Most of the time the board looks after itself. We've have the occasional nsfw (nude moot) and political-cartoon-fag. Respond quickly to those and we're fine.

lol, basically all the underaged b& are brainwashed libtards.

I can't believe they'd so strongly believe in equality and socialism bullshit.

>>200215
>all whites are benevolent
>all blacks are villains or passive victims

>>200230
except the trolling on /pol/ is done intelligently, /new/ not so much.

/new/ - News: the new News board has already strapped rockets to itself and is gleefully flying straight towards the stormfaggotry that caused Moot to shut down the original version in the first place. The board is non-work-safe but users are much more likely to find gore than porn, which is at least nominally in line with the graphic content of some news images. The sense of community is almost as strong as the troll presence, and there are a lot of oldfags who seem to have picked up right where they left off. This is where athens went, and seems to be staying.

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/27472#28433

Most stupid crypto-lib I've met on /new/ yet.

I never once said NNNP on old /n/, now that you have maybe 2 news posts on a page, my N key is getting worn out, and it's not from typing nigger.

>>200322
It's funny how said leftard ignores your posts on key points and instead responds to posters with weaker arguments.

>>200312

They really seem to dislike athens in /r9k/. I wonder why?

>> Anonymous 01/26/10(Tue)23:26:46 No.7286637

>>7286594
>athens

I wonder what it's like to be such an ingrained, die-hard troll. Does he even know he's doing it anymore?

>> Anonymous 01/27/10(Wed)11:16:42 No.7290973

>>7286637

He's proof that being a virgin for too long will eat away at your brain.

>>200342
Probably because athens puts them in their place in just about every debate they engage him in so they themselves have to resort to blatant trolling by accusing him of being a troll and so on.

>>200343
Athens is a troll doesn't matter how you put it he is trolling /new/fags into oblivion.

AHAHAHA, OH WOW.


I can't believe how stupid those kids on /new/ are.

When you completely crush all their arguments they resort to shitty "trolling" in an attempt to save face.

/new/ is a failure. We need to get it canned as soon as possible.

>>200327
Same here. It's ridiculous but this is to be expected. There's so many /new/fags now.

I'm doing my bit

>>200388
Good work /new/fags may be shut down yet!

keep an eye on stormfront's newslinks and articles section for good race conscious news to troll the libtards on /new/ with.

There was also some other site that used to report every negro related crime every day, it's quite useful if you want material but I can't remember the link.

>>200392
Post it here when you think of it. Also get back trolling those fuckers ASAP.

Needs more moonbattery

>>200395
And infowars.

>>200392

Do you mean this one? http://cofcc.org/

There was an Al Jazeera documentary on how white supremists are blending with republicans and they had this group as a famous example.

Haha, so much butthurt from the liBAAWWWls.

Just gave that Commie libtard a good drubbing about race differences in intelligence. Anyone else noticed libs are starting to abandon a lot of their old positions like 'race is a social construct' and pretend that they never believed in them in the first place?

>>200429
That's been going on here for the past year. My guess is that many of these "leftards" were only leftards because they were reared that way by their parents, media, and schooling, so they never really thought out their positions for themselves. Hence why the crumble so spectacularly when challenged and why many are willing to make concessions and abandon significant parts of leftard dogma.

>>200429
They are just kids bro they still have time to learn.

>>200429
>>200431
>>200433
Lol, what interesting and cute posts.

Seeing the State of the Union makes me miss Bill "big pimpin'" Clinton, he could look into the camera when giving a speech and wasn't constantly staring at the teleprompter.

>>200439
>dat pelvis

>>200439
Drug dealing, murdering, Zionist, corrupt, sex-crazed scumbag. However, he was interesting to watch on TV back in the 90s.

>>200443
There is no reason to believe he was either a drug dealer or a murder, even if he was a corrupt, sex-crazed, Zionist scumbag who balanced the budget, got people off of welfare and presided over the longest period of peacetime economic growth in US history.

>>200449
He inherited a recession from Bush 41 which stemmed from Reagan's policies. The late 1990s recovery was a complete illusion generated from the tech bubble that burst at the end of his second term. All the while the Fed got the ball rolling on its idiotic monetary policies during the Clinton era which has lead us to this mess. Clinton can be considered a success because he balanced the budget due to Republican trolling but still prevented them from completely wrecking the economy with massive deregulation.

/new/ is just /r9k/ with a SLIGHTLY political theme

Anonex, please do not remove this board; /new/ was captivating in its first moments, but I think we all know where our true home is.

> Seeing the State of the Union makes me miss Bill "big pimpin'" Clinton, he could look into the camera when giving a speech and wasn't constantly staring at the teleprompter.

Aye! I respect a man who can stare at a reporter's boobs and give an intelligent adlibed speech, sans teleprompter.

>>200449
While that may be true, he didn't try to eliminate the overall debt. Though that was more peaceful times, he was still a puppet president, though a better puppet than what we have had after.

>>200457
Where does all this bullshit about Obongo being some kind of ridiculously charismatic man come from? He's literally LOST without a teleprompter, yet libfags act like he is Cicero or Demosthenes reborn.

>>200470
>libfags act like he is Cicero or Demosthenes reborn.
pulling shit out of your arse again to help justify your hatred of a black man

>>200470

They're comparing him to Dubya. Americans have short memories and are just relieved to have someone in office who speaks in complete sentences.

>>200470
The nigger messiah is their golden boy.

No matter how much he fucks up or how much of a retard he is, they'll defend him.

>>200470
What's amazing is that before the SOTU address, many of the liberals on /new/ were just as critical of Obama as conservatives, and then after the SOTU address almost all of the liberals were united in their fanatical love of him It's like 2008 all over again. It's hard to believe people really can be such blatant tools, but...

>>200490
Haha! Yeah.... Do you remember /r9k/ after the election?

>>200490

oh yeah? Then what of all the conservative Tea Partying and the conservative Scott Brown and Sarah Palin worship?

>>200497
Actually, no, because I do my best to avoid /r9k/ altogether because I can imagine what a cesspit it is, especially after the election.

>Then what of all the conservative Tea Partying and the conservative Scott Brown and Sarah Palin worship?

I have yet to see anyone on /n/ or /new/ who fanatically loved either as so many leftards here and there love Obama. In fact, I have yet to see anyone on /n/ or /new/ to show any admiration for Palin at all, so its pretty clear you're talking about a fringe minority.

Ughhh Obamatards on /new/ are ridiculously uneducated.

>>200506

ah, underbrainwashed.

>>200498
What the fuck is wrong with the tea party movement?

>Oh look at those ignorant conservatives! They don't want to contribute even more of their taxes to pay for the ever growing underclass! How ignorant!

You're not more enlightened because you believe in giving brown and black people lots of other people's money. You're just an overly empathetic idiot who probably gets teary eyed watching oxfam ads.

God, /new/ is such a shithole.

>>200547
Well that goes without saying.

That's why we're trying to destroy it, remember?

>>200564
Its shit because you are trying to destroy it. Sure it isn't perfect, but you need to give it some time for the sensationalism to die down. Once that goes, so long as we continue to mold the atmosphere, it will be nothing more than a larger n+

>>200607
Nope not if the current word limit is there.

>>200607
It's shit because it's on 4chan.

>>200666
this

I don't understand why you people waste your time "destroying" /new/s its shit and it will always be shit. Why waste your time on it? Being 4chan is not what makes it shit; what makes it shit is the entire user base comes from /r9k/. 4chan has a number of good boards namely anything that isn't /b/ or /r9k/.

>>200681
/r9k/ wasn't that bad when it first started out. But I agree with you.

So does /new/ still suck? I haven't been for a week and if I wanted ill-educated tools telling me how wonderful Barry is, I'd go to the WaPo.

>>200696

Looking at the front page for /new/ they have one story posted and it's about a hacker that apparently dislikes Obama. So I'd guess that they're not really getting better at talking about news or at least something other than political parties and pop stars.

Lol crushing the Obamatards in all their arguments is fun but then they resort to ad hominems to save face.

Fucking kids...

>>200724
>Obamatards
>fucking kids
>resort to ad hominem

The sad thing is you didn't even realize the irony of your own hypocrisy before I pointed it out.

>>199658
Anonex, you should keep this board up no matter what happens. Even if 4chan's /new/ become a permanent board, I always advocate that the more options there are to get information, the better.

Besides, you can't even embed YouTube videos over there! :-)

>>200681
No, it IS 4chan. Boards on 4chan that are "good" are good because they're based on subjects that aren't as accessible and as highly opinionated as politics and current events. Making such a board on 4chan where its a huge clusterfuck of retards (/b/, /v/, /mu/, /a/, and /r9k/ all come to mind) is asking for trouble. Futhermore, moot, in all of his retarded wisdom, makes a draconian directive limiting what can be said on the board which uis basically just begging for backlash.

/new/ is shit because 4chan is shit.

Yeah, after having gone back for a bit I can safely say that old /n/ is dead. You should keep this board around because it still feels like the closest thing to old /n/ on the internet.

>>200755
Butthurt libtards like you are the core example of hypocrisy. Get the fuck out of my +/n/.

>>200772
This.

>>200771
The board is basically half dead and if /new/ stays up there's no way this board is going to get enough traffic back.

>>200798
gtfo yourself you delusional stormfag

>>200798

This is a good example of a butthurt person calling someone else butthurt to hide their own butthurt.

>>200772
/sp/

>>200798

The fact that /new/ is retarded is keeping people here. There was only slowdown for a day or two.

>>200803
>>200804
samefag.

Also strawmen and ad hominem is ad hominem.

>>200827
>The fact that /new/ is retarded is keeping people here. There was only slowdown for a day or two

Yeah, the average 10-20 mins it takes for a single reply on any thread on /n/ sure makes it faster than when /new/ wasn't here at all... YEP... AT ALL

When our most contributing tripfaggots are prancing around on /new/ posting 2 times a min it's not taking away traffic at all... This board is a godsend of speedy and quick intelligent political debate!

From /r9k/:

/lit/ - 114k
/sci/ - 101k
/adv/ - 92k
/int/ - 71k
/new/ - 49k
/3/ - 15k

Even on 4chan, even with massive constant trolling pumping up the numbers, a news board is still bottom tier.

>A single government would eliminate war, and would standardize education, currency, medicine, among other things. Uniformity is what is needed, a blending of the best parts of all cultures.

>>200967

What evidence do you have that liberals as a whole believe this?

http://whitewatch.wordpress.com/

This blog may be useful for trolling /new/. It's a racist black anti-gay agnostic who collects news stories about white people

Fucking hell I leave for a week and moot rebuilds his own fag /new/. But it's too late, this place is the best for news now. Fuck /new/, +/n/ is best /n/.

>>200798
>The board is basically half dead and if /new/ stays up there's no way this board is going to get enough traffic back.

Not as dead as iichan's news.

>>201074
>nothing is as dead as iichan
fix'd

>>201081

How is iichan dead? People seem to post there all the time.

I've visited new /new/ maybe 5 times so far. Seems like it's filled with way more clueless idiots than before. You end up having arguments about shit that's common sense for the politically literate.

I'm enjoying /lit/ and /int/ a lot more.