WAIT, ANONEX.


We need to immortalize this /n/ somehow.

It's the best /n/ could ever hope to be.

Moot will be an Obamatard faggot and close it down just like he did last time.

>>199660
Then we need to speed up to process and get all the real /n/ewsmen in here.

>>199659
I'm almost willing to bet money that >>199660 is correct.

But on the off chance he isn't, I guess there's no harm in leaving the board up locked for posterity's sake.

Or somehow providing access to the 10,521 deleted threads that have been automatically archived since October 2008.

Links to completely random dead threads:
Warning for America from South Africa:
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/49701.html
Obama: Constitution Fatal Flaw
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/56951.html
Japan 'should develop nuclear weapons'
http://plus4chan.org/boards/n/arch/res/67886.html

>>199662
You can do that?

I love you. Also, are you posting on the new /n/?

http://boards.4chan.org/new/res/4337


athens and some other +/n/ewsmen are there discussing about this.

You should post there, anonex.

>>199664
>>199666
I never have much to add to these conversations; I'm just your host.

An aside: this may not matter much to /n/ with /new/ up, but within the next month(ish) I'll be switching to completely new/upgraded imageboard software, as well as an updated theme.

>>199669
Looks... weird. I hope we can get some different themes like 4chan has example (YOTSUBA B, Burichan, ect).

I actually like this clean classic look we've stayed with over the years.

That format looks like it's full of unfamiliar unnecessary clutter.

I don't actually browse the other boards here but what do the other posters seem to think?

>>199669
I think you're just a host but don't you go to any of the other boards and post there? I mean, you obviously post or have posted on 4chan at one point to influence the chan layout.

>>199658
+/n/ > /new/

But I like this place better, with the soothing blue and the fact that our discussions get archived for posterity.

>>199675
Also the maximum length of each post on 4chan /new/ is ridiculously low.

>>199674
>>199675

This.

>>199671
I like it, personally.

Well I'm multitabbing between /new/ /n/ /a/ /k/ /co/ /g/ /ck/ /sci/ /lit/

/r9k/ has lost all its usefulness. moot's attempt at original content died along with old /n/ and old /a/ during the Eternal Newfag Summer of 07.

/n/'s cancers =
Republicans
Conservatives
Neoconservatives
White supremacist (see all of the above)
Zionists
Racists and Bigots (Again, see all of the above)

>>199681
If you took all of those out of /n/, there'd just be like. Two guys. Maybe three.

Fuck 4chan. I used to want old /n/ back but now I'm hostile to the idea. I'm staying right here.

Funnily enough, probably half the threads on its front page right now are race related. This isn't going to last long.

/n/ has really gone downhill in the last month with the athens clones infestation.

moot picked the worst possible time to recreate /new/... it's almost as if he wants it to fail.

>the athens clones infestation.

What?

>>199686
butthurt

mods are newfags, board is doomed

>>199694
Is it a permaban?
Also you should not mess with moot his butthurt knows no bounds.

>>199696
5 days, just for a toon.
Haven't seen any real Fronters post yet. It's like they picked out some mods from a Chucky Cheese.

>>199694
Dude, just IPconfig that shit or get a proxy.


They banned me 15 times now for hurting their precious Obama but they gave up eventually.

This is hilarious.

More anti Obama nigger agenda and /new/ will be canned along with all the /new/fags who don't know true /n/ protocol.

Man Anonex, you are a cool admin. Much cooler than moot.

I used to think I'd rather /n/ had more libfags.

Then moot brought back /n/... Jesus Christ. These people don't know how to argue or debate, they just bitch, bitch and call you names. That's it. They've spent the best part of the past however many hours complaining about racism and herp derp Stormfront. Sure there's a lot of trolling and off-topic discussion, but it's not really any worse than on the other boards.

I just checked it out.
Place is /b/ with a focus on racism.

4chan's /new/ is equal parts /r2k/ and /b/. It's nothing like the old /n/.

LOL Anonex. We hardly ever see you. Dinner is never cooked and nsfw posts collect like dust bunnies under the toilet. You're like a housewife who takes hubby for granted. But our old flame Moot looks us up and suddenly you're on the bed with your legs in the air.

Anonex: ONLY close down plus4chan's /n/ -if- activity here dies down significantly. I thibk everyone, regardless of where they stand politically, that our /n/ will be the superior of the two.

>>199703
/new/ doesn't even follow the newsboard format. I know there's an ongoing debate as to whether blogs and the like count as "news" here, but on /new/ they don't even have that much. Every single thread originates from an off-topic troll post.

>>199671
It'll be completely customizable. You can have the old/classic style if you like, but once you see the new crap in action you might change your mind.

>>199672
I mean I don't have much to add to any of this conversation; I was never really an /n/ user. I was in /b/ very early on until it turned to a flood of shit, then /co/ when it was added.
>to influence the chan layout
Buh?

>>199708
I leave most of the moderation to pepe (who seems to come and go). Every time I decide I should add someone new to replace him he reappears, ha. And last time I tried moderating /n/ I failed miserably, as you may or may not recall.

>>199711
Will do.

You dipshits do realize, you can post both in /new/ and in /n/, right?

Don't proactively try to kill /new/ just yet.

>>199718
/new/ is already dead.

I've been trolling it with Obama threads like the fist of the North Star.

Holy shit liberals, what have I been telling you for all this time? You bitched and moaned and complained, and that's what killed old /n/. Do us all a favor and just fuck off to moot's egalitarian liberal paradise already, leave this board forever.

I certainly hope this board stays up. It would really suck if the only decent news board was 420chan's and its slow as hell.

>>199717
Do you have any plans on releasing source? This is by far the best image board software around, at least from the front-end.

How long will 4chan /new/ be up?

[ ] 1 month
[ ] 1 week
[ ] 1 day
[ ] 1 hour

>>199724
Maybe a month. I think there's a chance moot wouldn't want to cave too quickly or else it'll look too much he got trolled into shutting it down.

>>199726
This.

>>199722
I'm a client-side guy; HTML, CSS, javascript, some flash, etc. That and actually designing. I'm /sort of okay/ at PHP and etc but it's not my strong suit, and that's why the site's progress has stalled.

The back end of the site is, presently, heavily modified Kusaba v1.0.3. But the modifications are 90% just reorganizing things to make the front end how I want it.

I'm currently in talks with some dashing, mysterious stranger who is writing his own imageboard software, and it's going to have all the bells and whistles I've been too inadequate to add myself, enabling me to focus 100% on client-side crap.

My stuff, I have no plans to release the source, but it is by nature 'released'; the client side stuff is free for you to read to figure out how it's done if you want to implement similar. His stuff, up to him. Don't know what his plans are.

I'm trying to kill /new/fags as hard as I can.


It's inferior to +/n/ in every single way imaginable.

You can't even post full stories. How gay is that?

moot desperately needs to put an /r9k/ style robot on /new/.
Otherwise that place will be nothing more then NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER forever.

I'm already laughing at all the Obamatard butthurt.

Our /n/ has a large amount of Britfags but there's a large amount of Britfag butthurt on /new/

>>199730
moot is scared of walls of text.

That's why he made an imageboard, so he could fit all his poor wit remarks and jokes into a single imagemacro that even a 12 year old can comprehend.

>>199720
I love you.

I'm contributing right now. It's hilarious how butthurt the kids who voted for him just because he's black are.

FUUUUUUUCK

As much as I hate to say it, we really need ISN and ISM back to do some damage to Moot's bullshit. All of us at least hate egalitarianism.

It seriously wouldn't surprise me if ISM has been arrested for CP or something though.

>>199749
>I am a giant faggot.

>>199750
>I am a giant faggot

Is that you Keith Olberman?

>>199749
Agreed.


Where the fuck are they?

>>199749
We're trying to get this shit canned. Post as an anon and get full racist on all the butthurt libtards. Just "troll", stop using logical arguments and conventional logic. It doesn't work against the libtards. They're too retarded for it. I know you're not smalltime, so try harder.

btw is there just no nnnp rule or convention on 4chan /new/

>>199757
I've been arbitrarily saging and and spamming threads with NNNP, even the one or two that appear to have articles.

>>199759
Good work.

>>199757

I've been trying to start it again. The best thing we can do is try to make it work. Sage NNNP threads and post articles in the 'Story/Link' format.

>>199763
Protip: we don't want /new/ to succeed

>>199755
>Implying that Conservatards have ever, in the entire history of /n/, used a logical argument.

>>199766

LOL, the mods singled out athens' thread from all of the shit troll posts for deletion. I wonder of athens was banned.

>>199773
He will be back.

>>199772

Typical conservatard, stealing someone else's ideas and passing it off as their own, even though it doesn't make any sense when they use it.

Even if /new/ isn't taken down, I'd like this board to stay up. /new/ is worse than /b/.

Fuck, we need ISM back.

/new/ will never be good. mootles insentience on no trolling will kill the board, because in his opinion anyone who isn't a giant faggy liberal is a troll.

>>199787
.>>199749
I agree, ISM and ISN add nice layers of trolling to /n/, its hard to argue with people who agree with you

Shit did 4chan just go down?

>>199795
Yeah not working for me, I miss /v/ already.

What the fuck.


Is /n/ down right now? Also, alt are you posting there bro?

I'm just spamming lol niggers and racist arguments until moot gets so butthurt he cans it.

>>199798
I wonder if overloading the report system could also annoy him.

>>199799
I'm already doing that but I need more help.

btw, got one of the mods fired already for abusing his powers.

His crying on the 4chan IRC was fucking hilarious. Fucking /new/fag mods wouldn't last an hour on the real old /n/.

/new/ is too big to fail

http://status.4chan.org/

Maybe moot will just can /new/ now. VICTORY!

  >>199808
This is something every /n/igger can be proud of, whether he's a conservatard, Obamatard, stormfag, libfag, or... hell, even an obnoxious chink like ISN.

Video related, our victory hymn!

>>199810
holy shit, that song is awesome and I usually don't care for anime shit.

>>199810
hear hear!

What??? No, don't shut us down. Here we have freedom of speech, there we clearly won't. We don't need that faggot's charity.

Plus I'm unable to open /new/, maybe he banned all of Mexico from that board?

>>199821
Nope it's down in america too I think the site is just down.

The entire site is down, bro.

I think some faggots are DDoSing or maybe /new/ is down forever.

>>199824
All boards are down since it's on the same fucking server.

>>199826
Well duh.

But I really hope they take down all the new boards.

Everything has taught me that all of 4chan is beyond redemption.

We can never go back to pre 2007 4chan. There's too many butthurt kids.

>>199828
Well, kids who don't know how to fucking lurk and just start shitposting right away not knowing shit.

>>199821
UK here, yeah it's down

Fuck, if I don't troll libtards soon I'm going to throw my monitor out the window.

>>199828
domain =/= server. lrn2 round robin DNS.

>>199826
Most of 4chan is fine other than /b/ and /r9k/.

High levels of fail, moot.

Less than a day after you put up the new boards and niggertits goes down.

>>199835
If it stays down forever, we should start dancing.

>>199838
We need a pizza party if moot tears down /new/, even tho that's pretty much the most likely thing to happen anyway.

YOU MEAN THERE SHOULDN'T BE A BOARD OVERFLOWING WITH RACIST COMMENTS???? OMG WHAT A LEFTIST! THE HORROR!

>>199834
Since I'm obvious dealing with a master here, mind helping instead of insulting others?

>>199840
Boundaries on civility, I can understand. No slurs, insults, etc.

But to say that certain topics or opinions (that the races are not equal in every way and that this ought to shape public and foreign policy, say) are taboo is simply bizarre. Having become accustomed now to speaking my mind here on /n/, I find going elsewhere on the Internet positively Orwellian.

>>199840
This is what moot thinks but he's a butthurt Obamatard faggot.

Anyway, the racism and trolling has always made /n/ what it was. It's one of the best things about /n/. It always has been.

http://plus4chan.org/boards/baw/res/196229.html

>>199843
What are you talking about? Saying that blacks are statistically more likely to be criminals is RACIST.

Although most libfags will usually forgive you for saying that if you make a jab at the war on drugs right after.

>>199841
Round robin DNS allows sites to have multiple IP addresses per domain. This is usefull if a site is too large for one server or to lower latency in other bits of the world, i.e. servers on multiple continents. It is also useful for DDoS mitigation, gateway servers can handle all initial connects and act effectively as firewalls for the main server(s).

>>199845
>The fact that anyone who is considered even vaguely decent by normal society wouldn't even go within ten feet of your ass is obviously a LIBURAL CONSPIRACY

What's always funny about this line is that /n/ is absolutely free of roneryfaggotry (in contrast to /baw/ obviously (the name says it all) and /r9k/, of course. I've not once observed a single poster on /n/ blame the niggers, the Jews or anyone else for the fact if they are single.