plus4chan
ImageboardsRadio
Sidebar Site Theme...
imageboards
MainFAQ[ baw / sug ][ cog / jam / rad / tv ][ ck / coc / draw / writ ][ a / co / coq / pco ][ n ][ dw ]
Avatar
Links:Avatar.WikiaGaang Jr. WikiIroh Screencaps

 Posting a reply to post #65601
Name
Email
Subject  
Message
File 
Embed  
Password  

  • New updates as of : 03/01/09


File: 124925372456.jpg-(23.14KB, 450x636, avatar-creature.jpg)
65601 No.65601
New movie sticky.

Expand all images
No.65604
Old one is here: >>58061

(But click this so that you can just see the most recent 50: http://plus4chan.org/boards/a/res/58061+50.html )

No.65605
>>65601
What the fuck is the picture and how is this movie related?

No.65606
>>65605
It's the avatar state




....mebbie

No.65607
It's from Avatar.

James Cameron's: Avatar

No.65616
>>65607
Oh, the movie that is destined to fail?

No.65617
>>65616
why? because nobody really know what it is supposed to be about outside the generic description of it being sci-fi?

No.65619
>>hyamalan's highest budget so far has been about $75 millon (for Unbreakable) so yes, this is a huge production the likes of which he's never worked with.

>>I think the budget for the first movie is $150 mil?

That's one big and really expensive mistake...

No.65620
>>65617
Don't try to argue with someone who frequents 4chan's /tv/. They say James Cameron hasn't made a good movie in centuries while they believe Shyamalan's Avatar movie is going to be a good re-imaging much like Star Trek was when it was released.

No.65626
>>65617
Because James Cameron hasn't made a good film in years?

No.65627
>>65626
He made a movie within the last decade?

No.65646
File: 12492686297.jpg-(26.20KB, 499x479, noah_ringer_is_not_aang.jpg)
65646
Noah Ringer sure looks like a lot like Aang.

Uhmm only if "a lot" means "nothing at all".

No.65648
>>65646
That picture doesn't look like Aang.

No.65649
>>65648
It doesn't even look like Noah Ringer.

No.65651
>>65649
But if it doesn't look like Aang, how would it look like Noah when he is portraying Aang?

No.65652
>>65646

If you wanna be more accurate, you have to shift all that from his head, down to his cheeks, and make him look a *lot* sleepier...or scarier...more likely scarier...Noah Ringer looks scary in that one photo, come on.

No.65655
>>65652
I don't get it.

No.65660
>>65655

Noah Ringer has big fat baby cheeks, and in those head on bust shots from a bit ago, he looks either very sleepy or incredibly evil.

That is the joke.

No.65663
>>65661

You're trolling our groove, man. Here's the deal: many Americas would like to think of themselves as living in an increasingly multicultural nation. This gives rise for the opportunity to break away from stereotypes and prejudices. In this case many of the fans of the show feel that the ethnic diversity of the show is not being represented by the target of your fanboy e-fellatio. The time for effectively changing the cast has long since gone, but talking about it informs Shammie how on notice he is with the core fanbase, i.e. the people who would most like to watch an Avatar movie.

No.65669
>>65663
Who are you quoting?

No.65672
>>65669

It was here a second ago. Trolls remorse strikes again.

No.65674
>>65672
You do realize it probably wasn't a troll right?

There are a lot of people who support this movie right down to it's casting.

See Youtube for instance.

No.65676
File: 12492838547.jpg-(85.12KB, 800x600, YouFail.jpg)
65676
>>65674
>See Youtube for instance.
I think you can look at comments for *ANY* video on YouTube and find full blown debates heavily mixed with trolls trollin' trolls. Pic related. That said, the casting protest videos have attracted a special breed of ignorant and hateful commenters.

No.65678
>>65676
I just realised that pic might be seen as an attack on >>65674 but that was not my intention, I was referring to stupid YouTube comments in general.

/clarification

No.65679
>>65676
Well, why are there people making videos saying that everyone should relax and enjoy the movie? You fail kind sir, because of your assumption that everyone not on your side are trolls. Haven't you learned by now that Youtube, other than housing trolls, is full of retards who argue with bullshit "facts" on both sides of the debate?

No.65688
  poof

No.65690
>>65648
>>65649
>>65651
>>65652
Working in another shop of how would Noah Ringer look if he was in Avatar design style.
Getting the sleepy/scary eyes is probably the harder change to get right.

No.65693
File: 124931772893.jpg-(70.79KB, 992x479, noah_ringer_vs_aang.jpg)
65693
I think the shoop looks more like Noah Ringer and his sleepy stare than it did before

No.65696
>>65688
Learn to not care that it doesn't resemble the show in any way and you will like it so much more!

Actually, I agree. It worked with The Spirits Within.

No.65701
>>65696
didn't that movie make Square go bankrupt?

No.65703
I agree that the casting for the movie is BS, but this "Noah Ringer doesn't look like Aang" business is stupid. Avatar is an animated show, and the characters all have pretty simplified features. Of course a real human being is not going to look like a character in the show.

Now, is it at all possible to have a thread about the movie without repeating the same arguments for and against the casting? Isn't there anything else to talk about?

No.65710
File: 124932816223.jpg-(45.62KB, 300x600, FAIL.jpg)
65710
>>65703

Like it or not, this is the stigma that is attached to the production. It's Kung Fu for a new generation.

No.65730
>>65710

The facial structures look pretty good, I'd say. Work a bit of that Hollywood makeup magic to darken Katara and Sokka, and get Dev Patel's hair into the right style, and I think we might be cooking with gas here.

No.65753
>>65703


Noah Ringer is a Caucasian North American. He looks like the shop in >>65693
Aang doesn't look like a Caucasian North American.
That's the point.
Of course, not to mention everything else being reimagined in the worst way possible, The Last Airbender will become the next fail!adaptation in the tradition of films like Scooby Doo, Flintstones, Gardfield...

>>This is the stigma that is attached to the production. It's Kung Fu for a new generation.
Too true. It wasn't a right thing to do back then, and it is not a right thing to do now.

No.65786
>>65701

thatsthejoke.jpg

Like I've said before, if I, or any other Avatar fan in the audience has to *strain* and make an effort to separate it from the show I was already a fan of, then it's a poor job of an adaptation.

>>65730

No, not really, if you take an in depth look, they don't match up all that well, any of them.

Besides, look at the headshots up there, they didn't bother with anything of the sort and darkening an actors skin so they can portray a character of a different race is kinda a hideous race relations faux pas(blackface/yellowface/Inuitface, like in North) what have you.)

No.65811
>>65730
>Work a bit of that Hollywood makeup magic to darken Katara and Sokka

Er yikes, you do know what you're suggesting there, right?

No.65827
File: 124942283547.png-(105.29KB, 298x409, blackface_nocap.jpg.png)
65827
>>65811

If you think someone being made slightly darker is blackface-ing, you should start an anti-sunbed campaign.

No.65828
Forget all of you, I'm looking forward to the movie and I'm Asian.

In b4 accusal of me being a troll.

No.65840
>>65827

There's good reason to get on board for that too. Melanoma.

No.65852
File: 124944653836.jpg-(141.24KB, 551x332, ihavetoomuchtimeonmyhands.jpg)
65852
>>65828

Um...nobody cares. There were women that didn't care having the right to vote, doesn't change whether or not this was wrong.

>>65827

Tanning is not the same as using makeup prosthetics to allow an actor to play a character of a different race.

(Besides, when you're chosen to play a vampire partially because of how pale you are, I'm pretty sure that qualifies you as a burner. No tan there unless somebody *wants* to bring Guido-Sokka to life...)

Also, new rumors being tossed around, along with a little internet sleuthing! It seems on a IMDB, Nicola was listed as Katara. No surprise, but this was way back in January '08, a full year before the revelation of the cast (though it was later removed until the full reveal.) There was also apparently discussion about this over the summer on mnightfans.com (which may have become lastairbenderfans.com I'm not sure.)

How would it be possible for them to have Katara so early? Well, as it so turns out, Nicola Peltz is the daughter of Nelson Peltz, billionaire, and CEO of the Wendy's Arby's group.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_Peltz

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrh.vbr.d.htm
(The whole family's listed on page 41 of this legal document, here: http://www.secinfo.com/dsvrh.vbr.d.htm#41stPage)

Naturally, this makes me think the audition process for the role of Katara was some textbook Hollywood Nepotism.

But it's not the most tragic hilarious part. It seems the Peltz family, Nicola included, are class-A assholes.

http://cityfile.com/dailyfile/5478

The part that sticks out to me was this:

>According to our sources, this sort of behavior is nothing new. Peltz's youngest daughter routinely threatens maids that she will have her father fire them if they don't do as she asks. She's hardly bluffing. Her last nanny was reportedly hauled out of the house by two beefy bodyguards after the girl decided she didn't care much for her. Employee turnover at the estate is so high that new faces appear at the house on an almost weekly basis.

So this means, one, we might see The Last Airbender toys in Wendy's, and two, irony of ironies, Peltz would have been perfect for Crazula banishing her maids.

No.65856
>>65855

Tinfoil? Please. More like Hollywood business as usual.

No.65857
File: 124944964824.jpg-(19.57KB, 400x300, 1247493516179[1].jpg)
65857
>>65856

Baleeted because I misread.

No.65859
You guy's are going to love it when the sequel comes around and Azula is being played by Hannah Montana and Toph is a blond and played by Dakota Fanning.

No.65860
Just to clear things up (even if the post was deleted) they *are* rumors, but it's not conspiracy theory-level, throw me a bone at least.

My main point was that there's some evidence that Nicola Peltz got signed on for the role far earlier than anybody else thanks to her family's connections (and that she seems to be a spoiled brat. I mean, cutthroat businessman may mean having some muscle around, but it doesn't mean you and your family get to be douches to your staff.)

If (as true as I think it is, it's still an "if") this is true, there are two implications. One, it means no other young actress, White, Inuit or otherwise, ever had a chance for the role, and even aside from the race issue, that's a damn shame.

Two, it means that Shyamylan may not have been the one who sought her out. He seems to have some success with child actors if Sixth Sense was any indication, and he did start wanting to do this because of his daughter.

But this may point to him having less control over the film than anybody initially thought.

Still stressing that it's my own speculation along with the little snippets of evidence, but there's a chance that just as this has become Avatar-in-name-only, it may well have been that and a Shyamalan-film-in-name-only right from the very start.

No.65861
>>65859
Actually, it's been rumored that Miley Cyrus is auditioning for the role of Bat Girl in the next Batman movie.

No.65877
>>65859
There will be no sequel.
I'm 100% sure.

No.65886
>>65877
This. I can see this movie being made. I can even see people seeing it. But I really can't see it being successful enough for them to do another movie with the same director/cast.

There's so much negative publicity, and the movie isn't even close to being out.

No.65893
>>65886

I don't think the "negetive publicity" is as widespread as you think. The only people really paying attention to this controversy are people like us, the hardcore fans. Casual fans make up the majority of the fanbase, and most of them are just happy a movies being made. Most casual fans don't spend time on fansites, and therefore probably aren't even aware of the whole "controversy" thing anyway. My friends (the ones who got me into Avatar in the first place) only know about this whole thing because I tell them, and they don't really care ("whatever, as long as the movies good).

It's one of those things that we're so mired in that we think everyone knows about it and/or has an opinion.
This film isn't even a blip on the radar for the general movie going public yet. As long as the trailers cut well and shows plenty of special effects, people will see it (Look at Transformers 2. It made all the money in the world opening weekend despite being terrible).

When it comes right down to it, we make up a very small percentage of the target audience. The Avatar fandom isn't going to make or break this film. I'm not saying that makes what they're doing ok, I'm just laying down the reality of the matter.

No.65895
  >>65852

You know. Every day I look at this board I keep an upbeat spirit and open mind. Then things happen that just put it into slow-motion train wreck territory.

Here's what I think happened: we have a billionaire heiress teenage girl that has probably been watching Avatar from day one, hears about a movie being made and gets daddy to make a phone call.

"My daughter is a huge fan of that show, and to be in the movie, it would mean a lot to her, and it could mean even more for you."

This is me not wanting to talk about it.

No.65897
>>65893

But then you have the protest movement pushing to get themselves published in newspaper articles (and in stuff like the Daily Bruin, UCLA's newspaper) and making appearances at cons. It's started a relatively unknown issue, but they've really pushed for publicity.

Shit they reached Margret Cho and the actor/filmmaker Perry Shen, and they've got a full year to tear the thing down, I wouldn't dismiss it so out of hand.

No.65900
>>65861
I just threw up in my mouth a little

No.65926
>>65617

Eh? What are you talking about?

I remember reading all about it a few years ago.

We're doing what we do best. Harvest resources, the area be damned. And in this case it's a planet.

Oh, damn...turns out there's lots of life here...well fuck it.


Hm, turns out some if it is actually sentient. Hey you, help me fight your people...we will have to merge together though in order to free this planet.


And so there you have it. Really, that's the movie.

Also, the teaser for it makes me smile. (Watch it on Youtube if you haven't) I hope it's fun. It already has mechs.(Cameron is a huge fan of those if you didn't notice.)

No.65928
>>65926
Wrong movie dude.

It's gonna suck.

No.65931
  Durp.

No.65958
>>65931
Nick Jr?

All in all a good video. Good to see some anti-fandumb

No.66063
File: 124960285250.jpg-(90.34KB, 1024x768, KyleXY.jpg)
66063
<--- I know, not Asian and everything, but don't you think they'd make an interesting/funny/stupid Airbender movies with these guys instead?

Everytime I see Jessi, not sure why, but I think "AZULA!"

No.66065
File: 124960372611.jpg-(19.35KB, 100x100, noah_vs_aang.jpg)
66065
Actually, I'm pretty happy with this choice.

No.66067
File: 124960381081.jpg-(19.48KB, 100x100, nicola_vs_katara.jpg)
66067
The only flaw here is the fact that Nicola is White.

No.66068
File: 12496038666.jpg-(18.62KB, 100x100, dev_zuko.jpg)
66068
To my surprise, Dev's head shape is like Zuko's head.

No.66069
File: 124960390744.jpg-(18.67KB, 100x100, jackson_vs_sokka.jpg)
66069
Ugh. Jackson has a very big chin and big head.

No.66110
>>66069
you are zoomed in too close.

No.66169
>>65710
...I can hardly tell that zuko has a scar.
What the fuck.

No.66170
File: 124972666693.jpg-(54.63KB, 730x901, The avat-OH WHAT THE FUCK.jpg)
66170
This is all I have about it.

No.66178
>>66169

Well, human skin usually heals.

After three years if a scar looks like Zuko's he has something really wrong.

No.66198
>>66178
He was burned dude.

Burn scars do not heal.

No.66199
>>66198
A scar is a healed wound.

The burned skin should have started looking like any other piece of scar tissue (albeit slightly more stringy because of the burned flesh), but it should not look like it was done last week three years on.

No.66205
>>65928
Um, no...not the wrong movie. I was describing Cameron's Avatar which is what was being discussed in those posts.

No.66213
>>66205

Fair enough.

I propose we start talking about Cameron's Avatar and Shyamalan's The Last Airbender in the same posts, moving seamlessly from one to the other until eventually no one has any idea what anyone's talking about.

No.66219
>>66199

It wouldn't be bright red, but it wouldn't be so subtle, either.

His ear was all crumbly, and he had some contraction of the skin that kept his eye from opening fully, and the hair follicles for his eyebrows are probably seared. Hell, in all likelihood, he can't sweat out of that side of his face, so it's probably hot, or feels like it's running a fever, constantly.

No.66344
>>66219
The tear ducts in that eye are messed up, too. Zuko can only cry from one eye.

No.66405
>>66199
Hypertrophic scars look very much like Zuko's, and can remain reddened for years after the original wound heals.

No.66449
>>66344
I have a burn just like Zuko's and I could still cry dude.

No.66455
File: 12501339986.jpg-(49.27KB, 720x480, 687.jpg)
66455
>>66449
Well, tell the animators.

No.66458
>>66455
Yeah, maybe you should.
>>58550

No.66460
File: 125013618447.jpg-(30.14KB, 720x480, ep51-694.jpg)
66460
>>66458

Actually, I need to check the commentary, but that may have been an animation error. Also, what does it really matter? It's pretty obvious Patel!Zuko's scar is nowhere near as intense as the actual Zuko's is. His ear is still whole, he can fully open his eye, and he still has most of his eyebrow. It was simplified a bit, but it wasn't wholly unrealistic or anything, burns like that are possible.

(Edit: forgot my pic, but his burned eye can't tear up like the good one can.)

No.66474
>>66460
real scars don't look like giant face vaginae.

check google. I do agree about the ear though but that is a really minuet detail.

No.66493
File: 125020417073.jpg-(200.54KB, 1011x1024, santa_claus.jpg)
66493
I have no idea why people are complaining about the Northern Water Tribe being white. I mean why is this fucker white when he lives in the same region?

No.66497
>>66493
But he's not native. He was born Turkey. Though by that logic, he's still unreasonably pale.

No.66498
>>66493

>complaining about the Northern Water Tribe being white
>Northern Water Tribe
>white
>Seychelle Gabriel

wat?

No.66548
>>66460
Is it just me or does the thumbnail of that shot always look like Zuko's wearing heavy eyeliner on his good eye?

No.66690
Some shots of the Fire Nation set.

http://www.saiyanisland.com/2009/08/the-last-airbender-set-photos

I have mixed feelings. At least the Fire Nation symbol looks like the one from the show, and not from that movie poster.

No.66691
>>66690

What's with the Greco-Roman pillars?

Why does the Fire Nation have Greco-Roman pillars? That shit's just silly.

No.66692
>>66691

Cliff Curtis has mentioned in interviews that Fire Lord Ozai's garb for this movie has a lot of Greco-Roman influence, actually. They probably just tossed this in to fit along the idea.

No.66695
>>66690

Oh God, it all looks so fake OH GOD IT ALL LOOKS SO FAKE

No.66697
>>66691>>66692
Or it could be a filming trick. The pillars don't show up from a certain angle.
http://images.saiyanisland.com/index.php?n=11366

No.66698
>>66697

Aaaah...trick photography. That makes sense.

I sure as fuck hope that's the case. For an Indian-American, you'd be forgiven for thinking Shyamalan hadn't the slightest clue what anything outside Pennsylvania looked like.

"Belgians wear lederhosen" indeed...

No.66702
>>66698
To be fair, it wasn't M. Night who said that.

No.66703
>>66697

I already figured the pillars are to be seen at a certain angle, which is why they don't wrap all the way around, but Cliff Curtis *did* say there's Greco-Roman influence to his outfit, so I'm assuming the same was given to some of the buildings (along with lamps/torches/whatever-those-spiky-things-are that look straight out of Mortal Kombat.)

No.66746
http://lastairbenderfilm.com/2009/08/18/exclusive-journeys-the-spirit-world/

Apparently it's a summary of a couple script pages that were leaked to this site. Unconfirmed + early revision = shaky of course, but still interesting. Seems like the time until the Comet is being extended to ~3 years, which could be something to accommodate a longer filming time for three movies, or to age up Kataang. Also sounds like whatever the Spirit World dragon is, it'll be taking over some of the Guru. In addition, I don't know if this is right, but the summary makes it sound like Firebenders can only create fire when the Comet arrives... so are Firebenders normally going to be mere manipulators (like X-Men's Pyro or something)?

No.66749
>>66746

Motherfucker.

Before departing, the Dragon explains that Aang must choose between being with Katara, and being the Avatar.

Not this shit again.

No.66758
>>66749

Oh, come on. That was in the show, too, they just never said it that blatantly. And Aang never learned the lesson, which could make a deal of trouble down the road.

No.66764
>>66758

Facepalm.jpg

No.66770
>>66758

No, Aang had to choose between spiritual enlightenment and his worldly ties, including Katara. Nobody ever said or implied he had to choose between his duties and Katara, and Avatar Roku certainly never had to.

No.66772
File: 125062669419.png-(32.90KB, 312x312, 12504682860831.png)
66772
>>66746

>Fire Nation has forgotten that all elements are equal
>Solution: kill them with water

No.66774
File: 125062673143.png-(33.48KB, 312x312, 12504682860832.png)
66774
>>66746

>Sozin's Comet will return and give Firebenders the ability to create fire
>in 3 years

No.66775
File: 125062679236.png-(94.27KB, 344x327, 12504682860833.png)
66775
>>66746

>Aang goes into the Spirit World
>talks to a dragon

No.66779
>>66775
Isn't that technically what happens in the show?

No.66781
>>66779
He talks to his past life, and Roku has a dragon. He also gets like...some kind of "training" from dragons, that mostly consists of them blowing fire at him and Zuko.

At no point do any dragons talk back though.

No.66782
>>66781

Ugh...

Dragons aren't supposed to talk!

Talking's beneath them! It's what makes them dragons! Their methods of communication are mighty and inconceivable to mere mortal men.

Damn fucking amateurs...

No.66788
>>66782
Our next development is that Iroh has a pet dragon. That talks with a British accent. And, interestingly enough, it works.

No.66799
"until he comes to a cave, from which a dragon (possibly Koh the Face Stealer, Roku’s dragon Fang, or Roku himself?) begins to speak to him."

lolwut
did they watch a different cartoon than the one we watched?

No.66816
>>66799
>did they watch a different cartoon than the one we watched?

...I thought that much was obvious by now.

No.66822
>>66816
That or they're making a movie based on the tv show with some changes to the plot. (GASP!)

No.66836
>>66746
I think everyone seems to be forgetting this little part.

>As we are unable to confirm nor deny the authenticity of these pages, please read on with a bucket of salt close by.

If they really did have script pages, and only 2 at that, why bother with a summery instead of just posting the actual pages. Just seems like a massive troll attempt as far as I'm concerned*.


*translation: Oh please please please, for the love of God, let this not be real.

No.66846
>>66822

WHAT

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE

I DEMAND MY MONEY THAT I HAVEN'T SPENT YET BACK

No.66847
>>66758
Zutarian?

No.66850
God, you people are worse than the LOTR fans who made a shit storm about no Tom Bombadil.

No.66856
>>66850

Except that Tom Bombadil was a minor nitpick among a quite faithful adaptation. From what we've seen and heard so far about The Last Airbender, it only barely resembles the show, so small complaints are less nitpicks, and more complaining about a whole line of failures.

That said, I remain skeptical of the spoilers leaked. Though, the extended time does sound plausible seeing as Shyamalan isn't filming back-to-back.

No.66881
Everything I hear about this movie makes me want to vomit with rage.

No.66887
You know what? Rumors or fact, what was the last GOOD thing we've heard about this movie? Where's our "Optimus is being voiced by Peter Cullen" moment that surely must exist given the amount of blind hope that some people still have in it?

No.66889
>>66887
If you look closely, AANG has an ARROW on his head!

Can you say FANSERVICE?!?

No.66892
>>66887

Peter Cullen wasn't announced until 2 months before Transformers came out, and the movie turned out to be garbage, so the comparison is technically unfair.

We still have a long wait ahead of us. A lot of good things can happen in that span.

No.66898
>>66856
>it only barely resembles the show

Aang, Katara, Sokka, Zuko, Four Nations, War, Genocide, Four Elements...What do you want?

No.66901
>>65601

Everything else that made Avatar interesting?

No.66903
>>66898
Needs more brown.

Seriously, this strikes me as Hollywood Racism at it's worst. they couldn't find a SINGLE young Amerindian actor who wanted to take a stab at it?

No.66904
>>66887
Well, for me it was Shaun Toub playing Iroh and then later the pics of Dev Patel as Zuko.

But then, I guess I'm not as picky as some people. The only real "WTF" moment I've had casting-wise (which seemed to barely register for anyone else) was Aasif Mandvi as Zhao.

No.66916
>>66904
>>66904
>Aasif Mandvi as Zhao

WTF? Really? I can't decide if that is crazy or kind of hot.

No.66919
  >>66887
I found a better one.

Not sure if this is real, and if it is real, if it's the final version. But still, it's pretty cool.

No.66927
>>66919

Sounds more like a bones only version. Nice find, though.

No.66943
>>66919
Come on. Don't believe for a second that the movie would use the show's theme.

No.66944
>>66889
...This is supposed to be sarcasm, right?

>>66904
I don't know. I think that Patel would make a good Sokka, and now that I think about it, Toub would be a good Pakku.

>>66892
I mainly made the comparison after reading the TVTropes page, "Cue Cullen". It just seemed like the most recognizable example.

No.66949
File: 125078367098.jpg-(299.12KB, 1045x768, 1.jpg)
66949
oh look, it's the fire nation.

I'm feeling fire sage temple.

No.66954
>Jason Isaacs (born 6 June 1963) is a British actor born in Liverpool, England


Remember when everyone wanted him as Zhao? Even though he is white?

No.66956
>>66954

He's Zhao's voice actor.

No.66957
>>66954
So what?

No.66962
>>66956
And he actually looks a little bit like Zhao, despite being Caucasian.

No.66975
>>66962
>And he actually looks a little bit like Zhao

I thought, looking "white" didn't mean anything, and that they're all Asian?

No.66977
>>66898
STFU swan-swan.
self-righteous prick.

No.66985
>>66975
I...what? I said "despite being Caucasian". And the resemblance is certainly helped by the fact that Zhao was modeled after his voice actor? No, Asia doesn't exist in the Avatar universe. Yes, Avatar's cultures were based on Asian ones. Yes, they have Asian names and looks. But that doesn't exactly mean that you CAN'T cast Caucasians. Just that you should make the effort.

They didn't. At all.

And I'd be totally okay with Jason Issacs because yes, while the character of Zhao is clearly influenced by Asian culture and physiology in both appearance and background, he was also based on his voice actor.

And, if they WERE going to pick him, I'd be okay with it, because hell, he would at least sound the part even if he didn't look it 100%. In fact, I'd be okay with them if they wanted to just put all the voice actors on screen for the same reason. Because then I could at least close my eyes and it would sound like Avatar.

But with the casting as it is, the characters aren't going to resemble the show in terms of the audio or the visuals, are they?

No.66988
Zhao was the only one from the Fire Nation that didn't look Asian at all, in the series.

No.66990
  >>66919
He uploaded two more videos.

No.66991
  DICKS EVERYWHERE

No.67008
>>66887
When Jesse McCartney was replaced by a competent actor.

No.67024
>>66990
...I actually like this. It has a more Indian flair to it, which is probably the point.

>>66991
This sounds generic. Really, really generic.

No.67027
>>67024
>This sounds generic. Really, really generic.

Because Avatar's soundtrack is oh so unique.

No.67036
File: 125086836873.jpg-(73.43KB, 1920x800, daaaawwww they rub noses.jpg)
67036
At least they got Sokka's shaved sides right.

No.67044
>>67036
this joke stopped being funny after the first 17 times.

No.67047
>>67044

On the other hand, it does improve The Last Airbender's prospects if its named competition is "Delgo With A Budget".

But then if Avatar flops, we'll never see Cameron's take on Battle Angel Alita... ;_;

Anyway, soundtracks! The first one sounds really rough, and not terribly enticing. The Fire Nation tune sounds interesting, and the Air Nomads theme is fairly atmospheric, but I'm finding them worryingly broad as far as influence goes, and rather unambitious.

No.67050
File: 12508835298.jpg-(208.36KB, 375x500, kyoshi_warrior_#3.jpg)
67050
Oh look, it's Kyoshi Warrior #3!

No.67053
>>67050
>Oh look, it's Kyoshi Warrior #3!
>Kyoshi Warrior #3

Ah, I was waiting for her, she's my third favorite Kyoshi warrior.

>>67047
I see it more as Pocahontas or Fern Gully in space, the only thing it has in common with Delgo is the ugly designs (which, I don't know why, seem to work in JC's Avatar).

Which of course leads me to this video: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=P5ZVUVNE

No.67054
James Cameron is not /a/ related.

Get back on topic.

No.67055
>>67054

God, why have all the chans got a massive stick up their arse lately?

No.67057
>>67055

Summer is coming to a close, school is starting up, its far far too hot.

No.67060
You know what pisses me off the most about this?

How impotent I feel about it. One of my favorite cartoons is being ruined by Hollywood politics and racism, and there's NOTHING I can do.

No.67073
  >>67024
Here's another one which is supposed to be for the Northern Water Tribe. It sounds kinda Russian to me.

>>67053
After Suki and Kyoshi Warrior #4, right?

No.67084
>>67027
Last Agni Kai. Enough said.

Although having now listened to >>67073 as well, I think the problem isn't so much that the soundtrack is generic as it is that it's all over the place stylistically. There are too many musical influences so that nothing seems to fit with anything else.

No.67103
  >>67084

You mean Demise of the Ritual?

No.67104
>>67103

Not sure why you're arguing this, but Avatar also had the little Cave of Two Lovers theme and the little xylophone sounding ending it mixed with during the finale. Plus they had that chant they'd usually use for the credits, I forget what they said they used for inspiration there.

No.67105
>>67104
>little xylophone sounding ending

Chrono Chross?

No.67110
>>67047
>>But then if Avatar flops, we'll never see Cameron's take on Battle Angel Alita... ;_;

Didn't those rumours started like 12 years ago? I mean, there have been rumours for Alita, Evangelion... even Ghost in the Shell being adapted by the Wachowski bros. They did Speed Racer instead and see how it turned out for them.

No.67114
>>67110
Speed Racer was awesome, and it was a faithful adaptation.

...Actually, that's the reason it failed. People went in expecting them to take it super seriously and do the matrix with cars, but instead the Wachowskis went and actually made it over the top and hilarious like the show.

No.67115
>>67103
I'm sorry. I have no idea what you're trying to say.

No.67116
>>67115

I think he's saying that there are other songs that sound kinda like the songs in Avatar, therefore it's okay for the music in the movie adaptation's soundtrack to be generic.

No.67120
>>67103

They keep making these games, and I keep crying at the end of them. I was stunned how much killing giant golems could do in convincing me of a boy's commitment in a relationship with a dead girl.

Current forcast for the Avatar movie as I see it is at 60% chance of OK, and a split 20% chance of either incredible or unbearable.

No.67131
>For those of you wondering about LAST AIRBENDER, all is well in post and we r working on a trailer for Xmas...

No.67140
I was just watching Iron Man yesterday, and I have to say, I'm really warming up to the idea of Toub playing Iroh. Sure, he may not look like him, but I think he could easily pull off the "spirit" of Iroh.

Also just say the "Avatar" trailer. Not bad, but certainly not the next great leap in CG that we've been promised. And we can't call it "Space Delgo" that was "Battle for terras" nickname, I'm calling this "Dances with space wolves"

Wouldn't it be awesome if Cameron's movie turned out to be the flop and Shababadoo's "Last Aibender" was actually the summer hit blockbuster.

No.67143
>>67140

>Wouldn't it be awesome if Cameron's movie turned out to be the flop and Shababadoo's "Last Aibender" was actually the summer hit blockbuster.

No, that would be pretty tragic.

No.67145
>>67140
About Shaun Toub: That's my opinion, as well.

About the other Avatar movie: Or the Last Space Samurai. Or Mighty Whitey IN SPACE! Naw, seriously, I didn't want to watch it until I saw the trailer, and then I was like, damn it that looks awesome. Now I have to watch it.

Finally, I think there's room for both of them to be successful, but I'll wait until we get a longer trailer before I start making predictions.

No.67185
  New movie update from JeffPalmer.

I love this guy's updates; they manage to fill me both with hope and abject terror.

I don't think the script thing is real; I think Gene Simmons is voicing Koh.

No.67189
>>67185

Simmons appears to have specifically said he was voicing a dragon.

D...does this mean no Koh ;_;

No.67194
>>67185
Good news: Sokka has his boomerang.
Bad news: He's now Bruce Willis, taking on several guys at once.

And, I know that the leaked script is not to be trusted, but...come on. Why nerf Firebending? And why Gene Simmons?

No.67196
>>67194
>Good news: Sokka has his boomerang.
Bad news: He's now Bruce Willis, taking on several guys at once.

Yeah, he's taking on multiple people (3), but it wasn't in some kind of Jason Stathem action hero type way. It was more of a panicked, scrambling "holy crap, a bunch of guys are trying to get me and I'm doing everything I can just to avoid getting killed" kinda thing.

Which sounds pretty accurate to how season 1 Sokka actually fought.

No.67204
>>67196
I seem to remember him being pretty much the plan guy and less combat oriented for most of book 1. I can't think of any point in either water tribe that he saw combat, much less fighting three guys, panicked or not.

No.67205
The hype seems terribly low.
When this will bomb, I'll be singing "I told you so".

No.67207
>>67205

Singing to whom, exactly? I think we've fairly unanimously had this project pegged for failure the moment it was announced. The optimists' objections to this consensus stem from market analyses and dispassionate demographic appraisal, not from anything resembling enthusiasm for the film itself.

Frankly, at this stage the film succeeding would be a greater shock...

No.67208
File: 125123471555.png-(588.45KB, 640x480, 1250573582847.png)
67208
>>67207

No.67209
>>67207
Yeah, really. Even the most optimistic outlooks about this movie seem tempered as hell. Like "This actor is good. He's not great for the role, but he's good as an actor and might not phone it in for a kid's movie."

No.67275
I'm GeneralNerd

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=6AC6a3fnNIc

Am I wrong, +/a/?

No.67276
>>67275

>debating Last Airbender
>online
>expecting genuine responses
>YouTube

y u do dis 2 urself

No.67277
>>67275

In my opinion?

Sort answer: Yes.

Long Answer: Yes, and here's why: Cultural influences in Avatar ranged from things lifted directly from different Dynasties of China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, India, Tibet and the Inuit Tribes, which could arguably stretch from Siberia to Greenland. It's a quarter of the world. The show was far more diverse, and to assume there isn't diversity simply because everything is "Asia" is like saying life in Pacific Ocean isn't diverse because it's all in the Pacific Ocean.

Argue diversity all you want, but remember that McCartney and Rathbone were specifically chosen, Ringer was not chosen for his acting, but his martial arts tape (Which means diddly when your fight choreography's only other movie was Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull) plus we've got rumors that Peltz was given the role long before there was ever an audition for any of the roles. Before you claim diversity by pointing to Toub, Curtis and Mandvi, remember that they were chosen because Dev Patel was chosen for Zuko, and Patel was a second choice, a backup when McCartney bailed, they would not have gotten the roles otherwise.

With that in mind, what the movie has done so far is put Caucasian actors behind the Tibetan/Shaolin monk-based Air Benders and the Inuit based Southern Water tribe, leaving the Earth Kingdom (that sometimes houses antagonists, and ends up needing to be saved) as Asian, but shoved Africans in there (Even though no African actors have been announced.) And placed a variety of brown-skinned actors of different ethnicities to be the Fire Nation. That's homogenizing the faces and races behind two cultures to one, leaving one basically alone, with a minor and so far unmentioned change, and changed the Fire Nation's people to a non-uniform mish mash of people only united by skin tone, when the original choice was a white actor, which explains why they're just sorta tossing together things for the culture (Mongolian/Rohirrim looking cold weather gear, Japanese looking armor, and Chinese/Grecco-Roman clothing and architecture?)

I fail to see the diversity behind that.

Culturally? There is no Asia. But there are a couple hundred different civilizations that have called the place home.

Since the continent holds the grand majority of the world's population, with much of that chunk in China, Japan and Korea, a world of nothing but those people isn't so far-fetched, especially since so many different places were used in the show.

And it wasn't just them appropriating things, the stuff you saw in the show was often taken from a real-life counterpart, something that isn't necessarily possible with things like Lord of the Rings, which had very heavy fantasy elements and stylization which had little correlation to real things. Food, writing, architecture, and even the characters themselves were modeled off the people they were based on most of the time. Katara and Sokka and many of both Water Tribes had distinct facial features that could be identified with their source cultures and were dark skinned, just like the real natives of the far north (All that sun reflects off the snow, you know.)

To me, it's as simple as this. The casting call, and it's initial results showed a clear, and arbitrary, preference for white actors, in defiance of the context of the original show. Paramount has dodged the issue, they're aware of the issue because of the protesters, the EWP and the MANAA, who were all ignored. So far, nobody from the original show is working on this movie, and nobody from the show has supported the casting. In my mind it's becoming doubtful anybody will.

So far, this production is a poor adaptation at best, and for many has become a painful reminder of, or a shocking eye opener of, the true race situation of America.

No.67280
>>67275
Yes.
And I'm getting a little tired of the arguments that the white washing is okay because Avatar doesn't take place in Asia. It CERTAINLY didn't take place in Europe (or Africa, for that matter), so why change what wasn't broken to begin with?

In the interests of of diversity? (When, of course, the only diverse cast member wasn't even the first choice?) How come Lord of the Rings and Narnia got to keep their stuff intact? Where's all the Asian elves and Black dwarves? Why is is that Middle Earth can get away with a lack of diversity, while Avatar can't? Hell, even Eragon and Bridge to Terabithia didn't have to bother.

And why doesn't Paramount at least address the issue somehow? Is it because every time they open their mouths they make it worse, or because they really have no answer? Remember that they'd already chosen 3/4ths of the cast as white before open casting even began! And, if the rumors are to be believed, one of those actors was cast ages ago. It's pretty obvious that this was a calculated change from the movie's inception.

No.67281
>>67277
Did I say it wasn't diverse? I said the movie is more diverse. Instead of representing a quarter of the world, they're trying to represent all of it. What is wrong with that?

Don't bring in McCartney. He's a non-factor as far as I'm concerned because he's not in the movie anymore. Also, whatever the casting rumors are, what matters is the final vision. You have to understand that despite his recent failures, Shyamalan is a director who has achieved the ability to do whatever he wants. You don't think he didn't get final say in the casting? Do you think there may be a reason he did it this way? And I'm basing the diversity argument on the more minor roles.

The problem here is I'm arguing based on geography and you're arguing based on role in the story. I'm not saying I would prefer the casting to reflect the show better, but if you are going to change the races, you couldn't do it better than how Shyamalan is doing it. Also, I'd hold back on assuming he's adding anything African, but now that he's gone this far he really should. As for the whole "brown mishmash" thing...white actors get cast to play characters of a different nationality all the time. The thinking is something like, "he's French, but he's white, so he can pass for Scottish." Why should brown people get special treatment?

There are white people that come from snowy regions; in fact, white skin evolved in ice age Europe. Putting white people in a polar climate isn't as "lol wut" as people seem to think. I should know, my ancestors came from Sweden. I'm whiter than white; I don't even tan! I burn.

A world with only Asians IS farfetched, just as much as world with only Africans or Europeans is farfetched. It doesn't matter how many there are; here on Earth we know that human genetic diversity is broader than that.

>>67280
No, it doesn't take place in Asia. Or Europe. Or Africa. It takes place on its own unique planet. Presumably, a planet with an environment like Earth and a species like humans would be as diverse as Earth. And the way they were distributed would be similar. Seriously, am I the only one who sees this?

> the only diverse cast member wasn't even the first choice?

The ONLY diverse cast member? How far behind are you? Only four actors in the whole movie have been confirmed as white: Aang, Katara, Sokka and Gran-Gran. How the hell is that whitewashing? In whitewashing, almost nobody is a non-white. Here, we have the opposite. The cast is more diverse than its source. It's more like rainbow washing.

I think it's because if they open their mouths they'll make it worse; seems to be happening to me.

No.67284
People need to stop making excuses for Shyalaman and Hollywood as a whole. The fact of the matter is they felt that Caucasians would be more bankable leads, period. Its all about the bottom line, money. Yeah lets make all the leads White, and everyone else will be villains and background characters, see we're being totally diverse! Hollywood has long history of doing this, its nothing new. Its basically Earthsea all over again.

No.67285
>>67140
>Wouldn't it be awesome if Cameron's movie turned out to be the flop and Shababadoo's "Last Aibender" was actually the summer hit blockbuster.
LOL! Don't count on it.

No.67286
>>67281
>>67280
...Like I said. "Not even the first choice." Zuko was originally cast as a white actor. The original intent was therefore to have the principal cast primarily be Caucasian.

You site Katara, Sokka, and Gran Gran being cast using white actors and actresses. IF McCartney was their original Zuko (which is NOT irrelevant, sorry) then the Fire Nation royal family, and by extension likely the rest of their nation, would have been Caucasian as well.

As far as your new points go, let me just bring this up.
> . You have to understand that despite his recent failures, Shyamalan is a director who has achieved the ability to do whatever he wants.

Shayamalan's ability to do whatever he wants is the REASON for his recent failures. If you're arguing that he has reasons for doing this, and had the final say? That's fine. But that's not necessarily a good thing. In fact, given his track record, it's probably an even bigger cause for concern.

>And I'm basing the diversity argument on the more minor roles.
I wouldn't have a problem with them casting minor characters as Caucasian or African. In fact, I'd be totally okay with Suki being cast as a Caucasian, for example (blue eyes and red hair? Why not?). And what about Guru Pathik? Wasn't the whole point of him being designed as an Indian guru to sell the idea that he wasn't from ANY nation? How is that sort of thing going to work now?

It doesn't matter anyway, because that's not the problem. Hollywood has always been okay with having minorities play sidekicks and extras. But when it comes to actual starring roles, it's a different matter entirely.

And also, I ask again. Why is it that these arguments in favor of diversity are either dismissed or never come up when there are movies in the making based on European fantasy epics?

No.67287
>>67285
I might actually see Avatar. I know shit all about it, and that ignorance is going to help me enjoy it, I think. Whereas my knowledge of the series and how badly the adaptation is looking is making it really hard for me to want to pay for a ticket for The Last Airbender.

No.67288
>>67275
Yes. Because for better or for worse, the Asian aesthetics and influences are a large part of what made Avatar a unique series. At best, they're being largely downplayed, and at worse, excised completely.

No.67317
>>67288
Being Asian doesn't make it unique. There's tons of anime for that; in fact, that's why Avatar gets accused of being an anime rip-off.

Now, if you were to say, that the Asian aspects of the show made it appealing to you, I couldn't argue with that. It's a matter of personal taste. Frankly, I enjoyed the show more for its characters, over-arching storylines, and visual style. I imagined it could be done just as well with only Western influences instead of Asian ones without those elements being affected.

Look it this way. Do you see how many AU threads we have on here? They all take the characters out of the established canon or setting, maybe even change their race or species, but we don't have a problem with them. Why? Because it doesn't change the cartoon. This movie doesn't either. Just think of it as M. Night Shyamalan's AU, the way some LotR fans (like me) think of Jackson's films as the world's most expensive fanfic. It's an AU where there as many Western influences as Eastern ones.

No.67321
File: 125146662670.gif-(2.92MB, 250x141, surrounded_by_idiots.gif)
67321
>>67317

>Just think of it as M. Night Shyamalan's AU

>:|

No.67324
>>67317
>I imagined it could be done just as well with only Western influences instead of Asian ones without those elements being affected

Avatar without an Avatar. Sounds cool.

No.67325
File: 12514723994.jpg-(31.81KB, 500x291, friberg_mosesandburningbush.jpg)
67325
>>67324
Aang is just a person who has an ancient and powerful spirit aiding him.

No.67326
>>67317

Our AU's can't really enter into it, that's like saying that if the actors are Asian, then you have to be Asian or you can't cosplay.

Our AUs don't have millions of dollars behind this, our AUs don't have people's careers behind this, our AUs aren't prolonging Hollywood's discrimination practices.

(Besides, I'm treating Singularity just like the series, an All-Asian world, and I'm purposfully avoiding Western Influence when I can.)

Avatar is called an Anime rip off because it *looks* like anime, it's styled after Miyazaki's works. The way Avatar is unique is the way they took Asian cultures and worked them into the story and the visuals.

And I have to say this...What Western influences are you even talking about? You've seen the weapons huts, and clothes for the Southern Water Tribe, right? The ones still patterned after Inuit and Eskimo cultural items? What about Aang? Is his little pointed hood, ever so slightly reminicsent of Spanish monastary robes, enough to discount the fact that he's running around in a burlap karate gi with shaolin monk's shoes? What of the West is present in his tattoo? How about the Asian trees Shyamylan brought in? What about the apparent Grecco-Roman touches Ozai will apparently have? The ones for the non-western-based Fire Nation?

You say there's Western influences, but all I'm seeing are innacurate East Asian influences with white actors for the heroes, and ethnic actors for the side characters and enemies, the ones who have to be saved, defeated, or taught better (Remember that if they cast the Northern Tribe with more dark skinned actors, like Seychelle Gabriel, we'll then have our white heroes show up to save the North from the Fire Nation, have their princess fall in love with Vampire Sokka, and be taught by Nordic Katara about how sexism is wrong...if they even keep any of that in, that is.)

I'll say this again. Peter Jackson's LoTR might be considered by *some* to be a fanfic, but overall? It's a straight adaptation, meant to capture the same aesthetics as the book, just like Ralph Bakshi's animated version of LoTR. If we have to totally dissociate The Last Airbender from Avatar: The Last Airbender in order to have a chance of enjoying it, then guess who's not doing a very good job? That's like telling somebody that you have to totally forget everything about Batman in order to enjoy Batman: Forever.

Besides, to dip into the Well of Speculation, how do you know this is totally Shyamylan's baby? He's not the one paying for the movie, and he's a joke right now, thanks to Robot Chicken and his previous movies. Remember that it's Paramount who's paying for this, and they're working through Frank Marshall, not Shyamylan. If you think the producer has no say over the creative aspect, or the nuts and bolts over what happens, then track down a lecture given by Kevin Smith when he was asked to write a script for a Superman movie, and remember everything he says about producer Jon Peters.

No.67328
File: 125147536229.jpg-(23.77KB, 433x284, wahmbulance.jpg)
67328
>>67326
You know what pisses me off about the whole "Avatar Racebending." The simple fact that no one stops to think that these actors may be the best ones who auditioned. I would rather have a well acted movie with the wrong races then a badly acted movie with the right ones. I just want an enjoyable experience out of this movie and if that means it won't be exactly like the original TV show, fine. I realized that if they made the movie I wanted, it would be enjoyable for Avatar fanatics and no one else. Plus what we've gotten so far looks really good, we're just comparing it to this impossible movie we had in our heads. It's not like we're getting Dragonball: Evolution.

However, if the trailer comes out and these guys can't act for shit, then I'm right behind you guys. For now, I'm just going to sit back and wait for the movie.

No.67329
>>67328

Which kinda isn't possible, since when you specify Caucasian before "any other ethnicity" you're already throwing in an arbitrary preference separate of acting ability. Plus Shyamylan said they chose Ringer for his martial arts tape, *then* brought him in for acting lessons, McCartney and Rathbone were specifically flown in, and I don't know about Peltz, all I have are the rumors I'd detailed before.

Even then, Aang's role was the only one that was left to open audition, the rest were chosen through internal acting agencies. (I'm not pulling that out of nowhere, I'll track down the source I picked that from when I've got more reliable computer access.)

You're also assuming a few too many things. Changes were going to happen, regardless, due to the change in format, it's to be expected, and there's nothing saying a movie closer to the show wouldn't have had appeal to anyone other than Avatar fans. You're assuming they couldn't find somebody who looked right and could act, or that Hollywood chooses the best actor, no matter what, free of anything like what they look like.

Oh, and some people already compare this to Dragonball: Evolution, due to the severe departure from the source material in nearly every aspect.

Thing is, they might be fine actors, but the process by which they were chosen, as well as other choices made by the production, has pissed off basically everybody that worked on the show, a large portion of the existing fanbase, as well as anybody the protest group is able to contact or speak with.

No.67330
>>67329

Forgot my name.

No.67332
>>67329
Do you honestly think this movie looks as bad as Dragonball: Evolution? I have seen no pictures of Aang hanging in high school. We're still getting it in ancient world.

Also I don't think you really know how acting works in the real world. You need an agent to get into most major movies, so I don't find it to shocking that there was only one open casting call.

No.67333
>>67328
>The simple fact that no one stops to think that these actors may be the best ones who auditioned.
This argument is just retarded.

No.67335
>>67332

You do realize that the acting agencies aren't that great either, they still choose who they represent. Remember that other kid that tried auditioning for Aang? Perris Aquino? Did you hear his story about how he was turned away by one acting agency because they were already representing "somebody like him"?

I'd still love to see Ringer's tape, especially compared to Perris', if they were so impressed by Ringer's martial arts that they brought him in to teach him how to act.

What about Brandon Soo Hoo, or Boo Boo Stewart? Both have acting and marital arts experience, Soo Hoo got an award for his performance in Tropic Thunder, Stewart has sung with Hannah Montana, the Jonas Brothers, and is going to play Seth Clearwater in one of the upcoming Twilight movies, some similar credentials to McCartney and Rathbone.

They both have agents, I'm sure, and neither of them are necessarily household names any more than anyone else in the movie, so why they weren't sought out? Hell, if I remember correctly, Stewart auditioned for Aang as well, so why did they choose one minor Twilight character/popstar over another?

No.67336
>>67328
None of the main cast had to audition.

>>67335
The kid from Tropic Thunder? Damn, that would've been good. He was awesome. Who was he auditioning for?

No.67337
>>67336

Unfortunately, I'm unsure if Brandon Soo Hoo tried to audition for Aang, but the popstar kid, Boo Boo Stewart tried to go for it.

No.67338
One cannot discriminated against anyone.

One must let all peoples audition no matter of race.

It gives one more choices to make.

No.67347
>>67317
If your argument in favor of the movie is we can distance it from the show, that just proves it's going to suck as an adaptation. Which is what everyone is saying.

>>67338
Too bad we know that isn't what happened.

No.67367
>>67337

Boo Boo Stewart looks even less like Aang than Noah Ringer does. Slanty eyes do not an Aang make.

Brandon Soo Hoo looks a bit too dark/indochinese for Aang, imo, but he's a damn sight better looking than Ringer. If I had to pick an Aang, I think it would have been him.

No.67378
>>67367

Same, but if my choice was allowed more variety, I'd have gotten Perris Aquino and just given him acting lessons like they did with Ringer. In my mind, he was perfect, he just needed to beef up his acting skills.

No.67393
I just want a goddamn trailer already so I can judge for myself.

Also nobody's blaming the actors, right? They're just doin their job and it would suck if they got the backlash from the incompetent casting directors choices.

No.67405
>>67325
Why is that guy firebending that bonsai tree?

No.67422
>Why is that guy firebending that bonsai tree?

Geez, haven't you ever read the bible? Because it slept with his wife.

No.67452
Here's another way of looking at it.

Say that Nicola Peltz, Jackson Rathbone, and originally Jesse McCartney were cast because of studio pressure, Nicola because her daddy's rich, Jackson because he was in Twilight, and McCartney because they needed someone popular to bank the movie on.

Maybe Shyamalan breathed something of a sigh of relief when McCartney left the project, but he was still stuck with two white kids in the water tribe. Ringer wasn't a problem because he looks a lot like Aang, from what I've seen of him, even though apparently one indifferent expression in an unofficial photo apparently ruined it for a lot of people.

What else could he do but change everything about the look and races of the characters? Would you rather have these two white kids in an Inuit village for no reason, or with some godawful tan trying to pass as Inuit, or would you rather have all the water tribe be white so it makes some sense? And then he cast Dev Patel as Zuko, which, I think he needed a young actor with some buzz to appease the studios, and honestly, there isn't anyone Asian who fits, not with that level of buzz, so he made the Fire Nation brown so Indian Zuko would make sense.

In that regard, note that not a single one of these casting choices seems racially motivated, and in fact the bankable star is Indian. So I really don't see how it's racist.

And we haven't seen all the sets yet; for all we know, there could be more Western influences to the architecture to reflect the changes. I certainly saw some Western influences in that Fire Nation set.

Also, even in the show, the Water Tribe doesn't seem any better than any of the other cultures. Yeah, they have brave warriors, but they're technologically backwards and sexist. So, if the Water Tribe was brown, people would still be saying the movie was racist. And we would be arguing that it wasn't because they didn't change anything from the show, and then people would say that was racist, too.

No.67453
>>67452

But...we know for a fact that they started out by saying "Let's go for Caucasians because they're the bankable race." We know this from the casting calls that placed emphasis and priority on Caucasians, and the rather flippant attitudes that were given during said casting calls. For extras, apparently. Since the one person that actually had to audition at all wasn't even chosen on the basis of his acting ability. (Great news, considering he's the main freaking character).

Now, is the studio wrong for doing this? Yes and no. They're playing it safe, and that's the smart thing to do from a business perspective, but it also really perpetuates the problem. They didn't put ANY effort into their casting.

One of the casting directors herself said they were looking for white people. Because there aren't any famous Asian actors. And you seem to be saying the same thing here, even though, personally? I can think of a dozen easily. At no point did she or apparently anyone else think "Gee, maybe the reason there aren't any Asians in cinema is BECAUSE of the way we're casting, and not the other way around."

There sure as hell are Asian people out there that can act, but the deck is pretty clearly stacked against them. In fact, it's pretty much stacked against every minority.

Furthermore, I still don't see why you're so dead set on defending Shyamalan. There's no indication he wasn't just as in favor of these changes as Paramount seems to be. In fact, given his track record of increasingly bad movies, it's way more likely that he was behind a lot of these choices than it is that he was forced to make a bunch of concessions. Especially since, the thing about directors? They CAN object. They can say "If we're going to change this, I'm walking off the project." Hell, did you know that Back to the Future was supposed to be about to be titled 'Spacemen from Pluto'? It almost was, until Spielberg said "That MUST be a joke." and the executives backed off.

But, let's play Devil's Advocate. Let's say that yeah, Shyamalan decided that changing a bunch of stuff was the lesser of two evils. That doesn't mean that as an adaptation of the series it's better. It just means it's time to throw in the towel and say "Yeah, this is Avatar in Name Only" and decide if you want to see it or not based on that admission.

Also, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like part of you're theorizing is what people have been saying. Patel was chosen as an attempt to put out the fire well after it had started. "You can't say this movie's casting is racist! We have an academy award winning Indian actor!"

...As the villain. Let's not even talk about the unfortunate implications of the fact that all the heroes are Caucasian, and from what we know of the cast, all the ones that need to be shown the light to be good, or saved, or are secretly evil, are decidedly NOT Caucasian, and instead think about this.

In order for Patel to be chosen for this movie, he had to star in a movie that won the Academy Award for best Picture. Whereas to get the role of Katara, or Sokka, or even Aang, the requirements weren't nearly as high. Even though, when you get right down to it, they're likely to have way more screen time, since they're the good guys of Book 1. That really says something about equality, doesn't it? So long as you're white, you don't have to try nearly as hard to land a starring role in a movie based on a kid's show.

No.67455
>>67452
>>67453
Also, in terms of what I said earlier in >>67317 , I refer you to this interview with the creators.

http://www.animationinsider.net/article.php?articleID=841&document=1

They themselves said, and I quote, "...we wanted to base it in Asian rather than European background." Does that mean it's no different from dozens of anime? Yes and no, because western made stuff pretty regularly disregards any culture not to come out of Europe. So, for a western made animated series, hell YES it's something that sets Avatar apart. That's why they put that stuff in there!

Could we then, say "Okay, western stuff is fair game to make the show more diverse"? Yes. Totally. I have no problem doing that. But then it stops being Avatar, and starts being an AU. And...it's fun to talk about speculative alternate universes and shit like that with fans? But I'm not going to pay ticket price for that. My money is reserved for something that attempts to be faithful whenever possible. And that's what separates the movie from other AU's. They're asking us to pay for someone's poorly done audiovisual fanfic.

No.67456
>>67452

>there isn't anyone Asian who fits, not with that level of buzz

Right, and a lack of opportunities for minorities in lead roles has nothing to do with that.

Still doesn't work because the Studio Pressure is still racially motivated by Hollywood's common practices. Paramount knew about the controversy, even before the time McCartney dropped out, Patel's choice has a chance of them seeing it as a token-minority-get-out-of-racism-free card. Also, McCartney got the call from Shyamalan himself to be in the movie. Judging from the comments we've gotten from Shyamalan, he doesn't seem to particularly value the East Asian cultures and aesthetics used in the show, it's possible he was shown a list of possible candidates and liked this particular group from the bunch. Also remember that they went to Greenland to film, and used Inuit inspiration for the movie version of the Southern Water Tribe. This essentially leaves us with Inuits, minus any Inuits, except maybe the extras they called for while there.

The discrepancy between the North and South in the show was only in terms of culture, even though the South lost most of it's grandeur and historical practices, they were still the same people. Now they're segregated by race. What was once a story of a rebellious girl going against her people's ancient traditions is now a rebellious girl coming and showing another culture the error of their ways, if they keep that part of the story, that is. Also, even though Kanna was from the Northern Tribe, and wasn't any different from anyone else in the Southern tribe, they still chose Katherine Houghton in contrast to Seychelle Gabriel as Princess Yue.

Also remember that the Air Nomads and the Southern Water Tribe are the only races that aren't ever an antagonist or obstacle somehow, so this still has the unfortunate side effect of whitewashing the 100% heroes of the series, while leaving all the villains, side characters, exotic love interests and people needing saving as other ethnicities.

It's a horrid thought that the live-action adaptation for a show we all enjoyed immensely has been tainted by something like Hollywood's old money politics, but it's not impossible as you're making it. It's certainly a conclusion with much less assumptions, at the least.

No.67550
>>67456
>>67453

Well, I'm playing Devil's Advocate because I honestly don't think the changes in race ruins the movie. Plus, I think if you really think it's racist and you don't want people to see it, you shouldn't make a big deal about it because that will guarantee people will go see it just because of the controversy.

I'm not going to argue with most of the points you guys made because I honestly don't see how I can. I just want you to know I think Dev Patel will be good as Zuko regardless of race and I wish you'd give him a chance.

Also, I seem to recall that the Southern Water Tribe was xenophobic and those monks in the Air Nomads wanted to seperate a 12 year old boy from his father figure. So they're not perfect.

No.67563
>>67550

People will go see something *because* of the controversy? This isn't Bruno or The Boondocks, it's not super shocking and offensive humor, there's such a thing as bad publicity.

Think of it this way. Imagine a restaurant, you hear they serve insects or something crazy to typical American taste palletes, and it's making people talk up a storm, so people go to judge it for themselves, or go so they can say they did. Now imagine a restaurant that's generating buzz because it refuses to hire or serve Blacks or Asians.

Things like this keep happening if people don't make something of them, that's why we need things like civil rights groups and protests, because more often than not, people just bottle it up and let it continue.

The actors honestly can be great, we know Dev Patel at least has a chance of doing a good job, so do all of them. But it doesn't change the fact that the process used to select them is flawed and discriminatory, and that taints what might have been a half-decent movie, and keeps myself and many others from supporting it.

If you don't think it's racist, I suppose it's your pejorative, but remember this: Polls in Newsweek once asked if Blacks had better or worse education, or chances for employment, and about 75% of the responses figured they had as good if not better standards for education/job opportunities. Those polls were taken in the 1960s, at the height of institutionalized racism in America. We can't fully judge for ourselves what the state of racism or racial prejudice is in this country if we're not the ones it's directly affecting. That's part of why I side with the MANAA and the EWP. They were both formed specifically because of this, they know what discrimination is, they've fought it before, experienced it.

Also, I seem to recall that Southern Tribe kicking Aang out after he took one of their own onto an old, dangerous 80 year old shipwreck, and set off a flare that had a chance of signaling the Fire Navy...which *did* signal the Fire Navy. Before that, they were pretty okay with the little guy.

As for the monks, they wanted to send Aang to a different *teacher*, regardless if he was the father figure for Aang (even so, he always treated Gyatso like his best friend and mentor, not really "You're my dad by proxy")

It sounds pretty dick of them, but it's not that they were doing it to all kids who connect with their mentors, he was the *Avatar*, he would be incredibly important, and would need to take on very heavy responsibilites. Plus, they were afraid of Fire Nation hostility, and knew they might need his power. Even then, Gyatso was an elder, he said he was going to fight the decision, and went to comfort Aang, he wasn't dragged off in chains and it's not like Aang necessarily hated them for it.

Pay attention to my wording. The Air Nomads and the Southern Water Tribe were the only races/kingdoms/people who were never once an obstacle or antagonist to the heroes during the entire course of the show, they've been cast with Caucasian actors, who have been given little snips here and there of the culture they were based from. All the pseudo-culture (they're not quite so careful about authenticity), without the people. Even Suki, Sokka's first and final love interest (in a move decidedly similar to Street Fighter, the Legend of Chun Li) was cast with a half-caucasian actress. All her unnamed teammates so far are full Asians (Don't give me any crap about Suki's hair/eye color being proof against her being non-Asian, it's brown, Japanese people can have brown hair, and caucasians don't have a monopoly on blue eyes.)

Everybody else, the people needing saving, the people needing teaching, and the people needing defeating, are different ethnicities, when once, everybody had a common, or at least similar, origin.

It may not necessarily make for a bad movie, but it makes for a poor adaptation, and it's certainly not something I want to support with my money or my silence.

No.67607
>>67563

>it's your pejorative

lol'd

No.67608
>>67607

Yeah, I posted that while at work. I'd meant to say something else, and didn't catch it.

Still sorta works if you don't think about it too much.

No.67643
You know, I watched Gran Torino the other day, which was great, and I looked up the kids who played Su and Thao afterwards. Turns out Clint Eastwood just put out a giant call for Hmong teenagers who'd be interested in acting in a Clint Eastwood movie. And he found them, and they were great. He didn't just go looking for Korean or Chinese, or Japanese kids, he went looking for HMONG kids. Not a lot of Hmong immigrants in the US, but he took the time to cast them.

That makes it really hard for me to believe that there were just absolutely NO talented Asian actors to be found.

(That said, I hate identity politics taken to extremes as I'm seeing it more and more in fandom. This Latina finds it all pretty patronizing.)

No.67663
>>67643
>This Latina
>screen name that does not reference heritage
>not typing LiK diS~*~♥♥
>no slutty myspace picture accompanying post

I don't believe you.

This is a really distasteful joke.

No.67677
oh wow, this discussion is STILL only people bitching about races?

why the fuck is this thread suddenly un-hidden. oh well, back you go.

No.67706
>206 posts and 35 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
How the hell did this thread reach this limit?

Last night it was the old sticky and now that I come back to this board today, it reached over 200 posts.

Oh well, hidden.

No.67707
>>67706

What? This thread is a month old, today.

No.67711
>>67677
>oh wow, this discussion is STILL only people bitching about races?

1) Articulately explaining your reasons for thinking the casting policy was racist and awful =/= bitching

2) There is only so much we can say about a few photos and two leaked script pages

3) And wow are those script pages bad.

No.67714
>>67663

Pffahhahahahah, I loled. That is the best response I could have gotten. You're a cool dude, anon.

No wait: ~*~*THIS DIRRRTY LaTiNa thyunkks u shud STFU ChoLO, nao checkk oUt My hAWtt piX~~~*

No.67737
Why does it seem like this is the only active thread on this board?

No.67782
File: 12520246654.png-(145.89KB, 337x282, 1250556187804.png)
67782
>>67737

>movie thread
>active

No.67883
>>65601

I can't state the sauce for legal reasons, but the Avatar series writers who took a look at the Movie script said these words:

"I don't like this. This is shit."

No.67897
File: 125216291416.jpg-(70.08KB, 640x376, 1206544441767.jpg)
67897
>>67883

No.67902
>>67883

Yeah. That's what I've been hearing, too. Script's been in enough hands by now that word is getting around.

Not that anyone is surprised.

No.67907
>>67883

If that's true...well...no duh, nobody from the original show has actually said anything of praise, except maybe some half-comments from Rufftoon when she posts news about stuff that comes out.

If it's not...well...no duh, that's kinda what happens when you get an over-ambitious and arrogant director with a straight disregard for source material.

No.68122
>>67902
>Script's been in enough hands by now that word is getting around.
Really? You don't suppose it could *accidentally* get leaked to the interwebs somehow? I'm desperately hoping all the stuff in >>66746 was fake.

No.68126
>>67883

Yeah, that sounds real legit.

No.68127
File: 125262240555.gif-(3.84KB, 541x311, 1243514361151.gif)
68127
>>68126

>implying this thread is about legitimate conversation

No.68129
>>68122
I'm desperately hoping all the stuff in >>66746 was fake.

You can hope all you want. But you'll be in for a rude surprise when the trailers start coming out.

No.68133
Once again, this is unconfirmed, it's off a forum post in AS.net, found it when I checked Racebending, so take it with a grain of salt, just like the script pages.

Original post:
http://forums.avatarspirit.net/index.php?topic=16476.msg1541031#msg1541031

>We changed into our costumes, then went into the next room, where a hairdresser skillfully wound two fat hairpieces about two feet long around my head to create a crown-like effect. Older men had false mustaches and goatees applied. Younger men were fitted with topknots. As a final touch “clean dirt” was applied to our hands in a make-up trailer. By the time all that was done the breakfast table had been taken down. We hopped into a waiting van and were taken to the filming set, about 15 minutes away.

>A Japanese village had been constructed in an old quarry. Several simple structures lined a road through the village. At its center was a ten-foot high statue of a deity, the protector of the village.

>There were about 90 extras, Asian men and women of all ages, young to elderly, and about a dozen children of elementary school age; plus assistant directors, production people, two camera men, and the costume and make-up people who applied sunscreen, tucked in stray hairs and made sure we looked presentable for the camera. Besides the villagers there were about ten young men dressed as soldiers. One had a wicked looking weapon that looked like a hatchet on a long staff; another carried a sword.

>As we waited to be called we could hear, but could not see, scenes being filmed a short distance away. We heard “quiet,” “rolling,” and “cut.” Finally all villagers were called. We strolled down to the set. The first assistant director set the scene, told us to line the road on both sides and follow the hero, the Avatar, as he wound his way toward the Statue at the center of the village. We were to throw yellow flowers on him and touch him as he went past. The scene lasted only a minute or two. After two rehearsals the AD called “reset”; we went back to our original positions. We took our places for the first “take.” The AD shouted “quiet,” then “rolling.” An assistant held up a board for the camera: “Scene 34 take 1,” clack. The AD called for “action.” We waited as the Avatar came down the road, threw flowers at him and tried to touch him as he went past. We heard “cut,” and everyone stopped. The AD was beginning to lose his voice when someone handed him a megaphone. Two more “takes” of the scene were filmed. Then we were dismissed and went back to the tents.

>After a while we were called again. The next scene picked up where the first one left off. We followed the Avatar to the Statue and threw flowers at him. In between each rehearsal and “take” we picked up the flowers and gave them to production assistants who replaced dirty flowers with clean ones. Before each scene assistants reminded extras to hide their eyeglasses. The action was supposed to take place before the modern era. During the scene set-up time a young girl was often a stand-in for the Avatar, the 12-year old boy.

>In the scene we again followed the Avatar and threw flowers at him. At the base of the Statue the hero met the village elder, who welcomed him and explained that he was the reincarnation of the man the Statue represented.

>We returned to the “village” for more filming. About 5 pm it began to rain. We were issued plastic ponchos and rubbers to protect our feet from the mud. It was Friday, so filming was wrapped up and everyone was sent home.

>There were only two speaking parts in the scenes being filmed on the days we were there, played by actors chosen for their roles by audition. The part of Aang, the bald-headed titular Airbender, is played by 12-year-old Texas native Noah Ringer, who won the part by sending in a homemade DVD featuring his expert tae kwon do skills. He has a black belt in the sport. His head was shaved, and a design was painted from front to back on the middle of his head. At the end of the day he donned a wig and joined his parents. The village elder is played by a Japanese American actor from New York City. Aang’s arch rival is Prince Zuko, played by Slumdog Millionaire star Dev Patel, who also has a black belt in tae kwon do.

>On Monday we were picked up by a van, arrived at the Mennonite Church and changed into our costumes. The hairdressers completed our transformation, and this time I managed to grab a quick breakfast before climbing into the van for the short ride to the set. We did not have to wait long before filming began. At the direction of the AD we filmed two more scenes. When he shouted “background action,” children ran across the road, a villager walked across the scene carrying firewood, a couple walked by carrying pots, before the camera focused on Aang. For some later shots the cameramen were mounted on a giant crane looking down on the action taking place below. The scene was repeated several times.

>Although we extras were told not to speak to the actors or director, M. Night Shyamalan was very visible. At times he took a peek from behind the camera. Sometimes he was about six feet away from us. Tall and slim in torn jeans, he joked and put his arm around young Aang, who seemed to be enjoying himself immensely. In earlier scenes where Aang interacted with the extras throwing flowers at him, the young boy displayed an engaging personality. Shyamalan seemed to have an easy relationship with the actors and the movie assistants. His manner was quiet and informal, but there was no doubt who was in charge.

>The next scene showed the villagers after they had been rescued from the evil doers. I was not in this scene. The AD told the group to imagine a big, big celebration, like the Yankees winning the World Series. A chorus of “Phillies” went up from the local baseball fans among the extras. The AD explained himself: “I’m from New York.”

>The final scene involved the villain Prince Zuko, played by Slumdog Millionaire star Dev Patel. He is a tall compelling young man who looked very appealing until it was time to shoot. Dressed in full-length maroon cloaks, he and his two lieutenants put up their hoods, hiding their faces, and marched resolutely onto the scene. They looked very menacing. In this scene I was assigned to sweep the dirt floor of a hut while another woman stirred a pot of gruel and two men pretended to beat drums with their hands.

>By the time this scene was completed it was about 5:00 pm. The assistant director thanked all the extras, saying “You did a fantastic job. Thank you.” We climbed into the vans to be taken to the church where we changed back into our own clothes and checked out with the people responsible for the vouchers so we could be paid. We were done.

So! Thoughts? Possibilities? Kyoshi is now a man, or was the extra simply mistaken?

Part that worries me is that the people here outright worship Aang, vying to try and touch him and throwing flowers in his path. It kinda portrays Aang as a messiah figure, but one decidedly different from the kind he was in the show.

To mention this in the context of the race controversy. One, doesn't this still make Suki herself the only Kyoshi citizen who isn't fully Asian? Two, doesn't this kinda hearken to the Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom? (Another of Frank Marshall's movies, if I remember correctly.) The whole thing of natives gathering around a white person as a god or deity-like figure?

I know the citizens of Kyoshi accepted Aang with a fervor when they found he was the Avatar...but that was *after* they knew he was the reincarnation of Kyoshi, they would have thrown the Gaang to the Unagi otherwise.

Even then, it wasn't worship as much as it was all of the little girls of the Island wanting to hang with Aang, and people cleaning and repainting Kyoshi's statue out of reverence.

Eh, I'll cut it off there, like I'd said, this is still just a rumor from a supposed extra. Still, it's rather detailed, how possible/legit does this sound?

No.68137
>>68133
I can't come to this board anymore. I just can't. It just makes me so angry.

I'm literally shaking as I type this.

No.68139
Fairly legit.

It's pretty clear that the movie is down the shithole now. No matter how many retarded arguments T-shirt Boy wants to mount, the gears of the hollywood money machine are clearly grinding here. M. Night Whatatweets' head has been smelling his lower intestinal tract for a good long while, and this will in no way be a come back.

It'll end up like District 9: pretty but ultimately worthless.

No.68141
You know what really pisses me off about this movie?

The fact that they killed the cartoon for it. I wouldn't have minded if they had just left it alone, let them have their crappy movie, but no: they had to go and cancel the TV Movie Trilogy they had planned because they didn't want people getting "CONFUSED".

And what happens now? If the movie fails, the cartoon is dead. No one's gonna invest in a "failure". If the movie succeeds, they make more shitty movies and screw the cartoon. Or worse, make a cartoon based on the movie.

Fuck fuck fuck fuck FUCK!

No.68149
>>68139
i liked district 9 :(

No.68150
>>68149
>i liked district 9 :(

Then I'm sure you'll love The Last Airbender!

>>68141
>And what happens now? If the movie fails, the cartoon is dead. No one's gonna invest in a "failure". If the movie succeeds, they make more shitty movies and screw the cartoon. Or worse, make a cartoon based on the movie.

Sadly, none of that is at all unlikely. But we can hope! Nickelodeon has managed the Avatar brand so well until now, so I'm sure...

....wait.....

shit.

No.68151
>>68133

>but that was *after* they knew he was the reincarnation of Kyoshi

Doesn't the very fact that he's THE AVATAR give that away?

No.68154
>>68151

They still captured him, it's not like there's a standard for what Avatars look like. But yeah, once he proved he was the Avatar by airbending, they realized "Oh, this kid is the reincarnation of Kyoshi, let's let our little girls fawn over him, and have that one guy foam at the mouth at the mere sight of him."

...Oh my fucking god, they made everybody in Kyoshi that foamy guy.

No.68162
>>68154

LEEEOOON! HEEEEEEELLLLP!

No.68172
>>68171
...yes?

No.68175
>>68154

Well maybe he uses Air Bending in a fight before hand and ends up beating the Kyoshi Warriors this time around.

No.68176
>>68175

Wait, why would he fight the Kyoshi Warriors? Why not the Fire Nation? And if that's the case, why did this Extra mention Dev Patel showing up in a hood and stuff if the Fire Nation was already there? And why does that prompt Aang worship? That'd be like worshiping the reincarnation of George Washington.

...I mean, being the reincarnation of George Washington, and showing up to kick ass sounds awesome as hell, but still...

No.68178
>>68176
>..I mean, being the reincarnation of George Washington, and showing up to kick ass sounds awesome as hell, but still...
That would make for a cool action series.

No.68181
The idea of MKS turning Kyoshi into a dude pissed me off enough that I called in a favor.

I know a guy who has the script and asked him to check, since it's such a minor thing. He says that the statue of Avatar Kyoshi is described as "a beautiful woman in a kimono." So I guess that's something.

No.68183
>>68181

A Korean Kimono?

Ha-ha, Dee Dee Rickets Joke

Well if you're not blowing smoke, and the script isn't some sort of outdated version in the face of a last minute change, that would be *one* less thing to be pissed at...

No.68185
File: 125273124971.jpg-(43.27KB, 720x480, ep32-491.jpg)
68185
Hrm...

http://www.mlra.org/magazine/Extra3534.htm

Okay, so it seems the extra's account of the film up there was legit, and in fact abridged. There's even more detail to be had on the full story that I just linked to.

Whether or not Kyoshi is still a woman is largely irrelevant, everything else is in the movie.

No.68187
>>68181

Oh for pete's sake, is everything worn by East Asian women a "kimono" to these people?

Thank god no one's wearing "Belgian lederhosen" yet...

No.68190
>>68176
>That'd be like worshiping the reincarnation of George Washington.
I'd do it.

No.68209
>>68181
>Avatar Kyoshi
>Beautiful

Something doesn't add up...

No.68232
>>68226

Reporting because I have no idea where those links lead and the video appears to be a dud.

No.68234
Is this the only movie(s) the kids are going to be casted in or will other directors see the film and decide to cast them for their movies. I mean, Noah doesn't seem to be the type that wants to be an actor for a profession. He probably just tried out because he was an Avatar fan like everyone else at the auditions.

No.68235
>>68139
You mentioned me! I'm honored!

Okay, in my opinion, except for the possibility of a male Kyoshi, which could have been a mistake, I don't see much that is rage-worthy here. There is a definite shift in tone here, I will admit. In the cartoon they treat Aang more like a celebrity and less like a religious figure, but I think with the more serious tone Shymalan has already hinted at, that's to be expected. I'm starting to think of this film less as an adaptation and more as a separate project completely. It's really the only way I can maintain my stance of cautious optimism and not descend into a spiral of unending fury.

Also, the wording of that was a bit confusing. He said they needed to redress the set to a time before the modern era; maybe the girl he thought was Aang's stand in was Kyoshi, and the statue of a man was an earlier Avatar?

Bit of a stretch; only way that works is if Kyoshi was bald as a kid. But it's what I thought when I was reading it.

No.68241
>>68235

One of Noah Ringer's doubles is a female martial artist. So, no, it wasn't Kyoshi walking down the road.

Plus, they were filming in an old quarry, they probablly just had to remove evidence of such.

If you have to think of it as a separate project altogether just so that you don't hate it, then why bother supporting it at all?

No.68246
>>68241

Because it's a separate project. It's M. Night Shyamalan's Avatar trilogy, not the show. Hate to admit it, but at this point there's pretty much no denying it.

Not a good thing, not a bad thing. Just different.

No.68247
>>68246

>Not a good thing, not a bad thing. Just different.

Considering the race issue, and what we've heard about the movie so far...I'm gonna go ahead and say "different" means "bad" in this context.

You can't say Avatar ripped off martial arts movies and was full of fart jokes, and expect my opinion of this to reamain at anything other than disdain.

No.68248
>>68247
>You can't say Avatar ripped off martial arts movies and was full of fart jokes, and expect my opinion of this to reamain at anything other than disdain.

This. His obvious disdain for and disrespect of the original series leaves a bad taste in my mouth, and gives me no reason to think his movie will have anything to do with what made me love ATLA in the first place. He seems to be viewing it as childish raw material, with potential he can remake to fit his own vision of what narrative should be. And given the state of his filmmaking career and the stories he's chose to tell? Yeah.

No.68252
When I see this movie I am going to be browsing various fansites to see if they accept it or reject it. Then I would know rather or not I like the film.

No.68254
>>68247

>say Avatar ripped off martial arts films

Wait wat who said that

No.68257
>>68254
>source for accusation of martial arts ripping?

http://ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=3413

"What is funny is that you can see so many influences in the cartoon with scenes almost copied entirely from martial art movies, but I wanted the live action film to be truly original with action scenes you had never seen before."

Also from that interview:

"What I did was remove anything that was too slap-sticky and cheesy -- the stuff that was there for the very little kids, but wouldn’t work in a live action feature like the fart jokes. I grounded the thing a little more. I grounded Katara’s brother for example and it brought a great new overall tone to the whole movie."

Translates to: "I only kinda half-watched the show, which is why I think it had any fart jokes at all, and also why I can't seem to remember Sokka's name right now!"

No.68258
>>68257

...How is that accusing the show of copying? That's just saying some of the show's sequences were derived from well-known film scenes. That's not "OMG SHOW COPIED," that's "there were a lot of homages in the show that we don't see fitting in our films."

And if you're seriously denying the silliness of the show relative to the direction Shyamalan is taking it...wat.

No.68259
>>68258

It's an obnoxious way to talk about a show that YOU ARE ADAPTING INTO A MOVIE. Who is he to talk about "original" in this regard? Seriously.

And of course the show is sillier than the tone he's going for with TLA. The point is that the tone he uses to talk about the show is dismissive and patronizing, and that his desire to "ground" various characters is misguided and evidences a poor understanding of what made the show appealing in the first place.

No.68261
>>68259

>dismissive and patronizing

If you choose to see it that way, that's how you'll see it.

I read it as endearing and respectful. It shows he noticed and recognized the homages in the first place, but decided to bring the material into a new light because he thinks the films can be something truly great.

He wasn't saying the show was bad for having some childish elements and reminiscent choreography, he was just saying he wants the films to be different.

I do agree on the character changes, though. Each person, ESPECIALLY Sokka, needed to be who they were for the story to work. I don't know what he plans to do with this "grounding," but I hope it works because Sokka isn't Sokka if he's "grounded" in a bad way.

No.68262
>>68258

But...no they weren't, if you watched the video they referenced the Jet vs. Zuko sword fight from, it's Sifu Kisu and Bryan acting the whole fight out in slow-mo. Spike fighting Vincent in Cowboy BeBop: The Movie and Naruto fighting Neji during the Chuunin Exam arc in Naruto were a direct homage to a Bruce Lee fight sequence (Though the second one may have just been the crap animation team they somtimes have.)

But that didn't happen in Avatar, they didn't have scenes "almost copied entirely from martial art movies". He basically just said "Well, they lifted stuff straight from other movies, but I'm doing something different! See?"

If by different you mean hiring the fight choreographer from Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull to do your fight scenes, that is.

And Avatar did have little gags that wouldn't work outside of animation, various sight gags and the like, but fart jokes? Really? There's literally one direct fart joke in the third season.

Who talks about something they were supposedly a fan of like that? The sheer arrogance it takes for words like that could only come from a director who once cast *himself* as a revolutionary author who would be martyred for the greatness of his ideas.

No.68290
>>68185
>The company had to spread their net wide to recruit enough Japanese and other Asian Americans to portray the close to 90 villagers.

Yet somehow there were no available Asians to play the main characters, as many pro-casters have claimed. Fuck you, TLA directors. This just helps prove that whitewashing the main cast was intentional.

No.68296
>>68290
That's Hollywood for ya!

No.68385
File: 125312005029.jpg-(449.69KB, 850x1441, The_Banished_Prince_by_Blue_Ten.jpg)
68385
I can complain alot about this film, but I am happy so far with one thing. I think Dev looks just right for the role, he does not look exactly like Zuko, but he has Zuko's major qualities. He's Dark, tough, and even a little bit nerdy. I wasn't blown away by his acting in Slumdog millionaire. He seems like he has Duchovnian range but I like (really like) the look so far. Go to hell, Jessie McCartney.

No.68400
File: 125313414221.png-(329.77KB, 720x480, whatyousay.png)
68400
>>68385
>I think Dev looks just right for the role
>He's Dark

lol no

No.68402
>>68262
Agreed.

This isn't "Lol New Direction Guiz" this is "Lol I am not actually a fan of the show/don't know what the fuck I'm talking about".

Movie will be terrible. Maybe not terrible in its' own right, but forever destined for Mediocrity.

No.68410
>>68400
...Pretty sure that poster meant spiritually, or personality wise, man.

No.68439
File: 125319409110.jpg-(15.94KB, 250x203, Cliff_curtis_tv.jpg)
68439
Cliff Curtis was asked about his role as Fire Lord Ozai in The Last Airbender while promoting his upcoming television series Trauma at the Television Critics Association's summer press tour last month. "I'm kind of like the Darth Vader character for that franchise," Curtis said. "That's a trilogy, and if all goes well, I'll be back for the second and the third installment."

When asked about director M. Night Shyamalan, Curtis responded by saying; "I think that M. Night's a really interesting filmmaker, and when he spoke to me about it, he said that one of the most influential films he ever saw was Star Wars," Curtis said. "For him, this was his Star Wars that he wanted to make, so I thought that's a really interesting way to have a look at this kind of franchise."

The highlight of the live-action shoot for Cliff Curtis? Ozai's costume. "Outstanding, the most beautiful costume I've ever had in my career, actually," Curtis said. "It's sort of like a cross between Roman and kind of Greek, [a] gold, Roman and Greek military/samurai military [uniform]. It's really, really beautiful."

[Read more at SciFiWire.com]

_____
Source: http://www.lastairbenderfans.com/

No.68441
>>68439

>he hasn't watched the show

inb4 shitstorm

No.68442
>>68441

Oh dear boy, the shitstorm started ages ago.

But anyway, more of the same.

No.68444
I don't mind them equating Avatar to Star Wars, but Ozai is really more like Palpatine than Vader. If anything, Zuko is Vader.

You know, this makes me think. Did Ozai even get a lot of screen time in season 1? The villains were Zhao and Zuko. I mean, I know for a fact that we don't see Ozai's face until season 3.

No.68445
>>68444

I think it's pretty clear that MNS has changed that aspect of the story. If Ozai were going to be nothing but a shadowy figure at Zuko's Agni Kai, they wouldn't have designed elaborate, inexplicably Roman armor for him.

No.68464
File: 125322632727.png-(536.23KB, 720x480, ep51-291.png)
68464
I find your lack of faith in me distrubing.

No.68488
>>68464
Ha. It's not you we doubt, sweet-cheeks, it's whether the director is competent enough to get your characterization right.

No.68494
>>68488

>it's whether we can learn to appreciate a different approach or not

Not much is remaining constant from the show.

No.68505
>>68494
Okay, back up for a minute. You understand what made the show good, right? The characterization, the sampling of different asian cultures, the fucking humor?

Yeah, everything we're seeing suggests that it's a new approach. An approach designed to copy motherfucking Star Wars. Jesus H. Christ Cookies on Christmas.

>>Used to a different approach.

Yes, an approach that ignores basically everything that made the original good to begin with. An approach that, for all intents and purposes, is probably meant to mimic THE most nerd worshiped (and fanfiction-copied) story of all time.

The only argument you seem to have on your side is "WELL MAYBE YOU GUYS ARE WRONG". An argument which looks weaker and weaker as more information surfaces.

No.68506
>>68505

The reason a lot of people are still pissy about the movies is the reason I'm trying to point out.

It's not the show. It's the movies. By M. Night Shyamalan.

It's not the Nickelodeon cartoon made by Mike and Bryan with all the animators, writers, directors, musicians, sound crew, etc that we already know.

It won't be on television. It will probably be in a theater of some sort.

It's not the show.

No.68507
>>68506

Does that somehow excuse or justify any of the decisions they've made?

Saying it's separate from the show simply stating the obvious, but that doesn't invalidate the complaints from fans, the protesters, the East West Players, or the Media Action Network for Asian Americans.

No.68508
>>68506
>It's not the show.

Yes, we're aware.

But here is the thing.

It would be one thing if he just took the basic concept and went somewhere else entirely with it. But instead, it seems like he's cherry picking what he decided was worthwhile about the story and characters and then twisting them to make them "better" somehow. More serious! More "original"! More STAR WARS! (Because nothing says "original" like trying to ape the SW movies.)

It's too much alike for me to just see it as a completely separate, new thing. But it's too different in some pretty key ways for me to want to have anything to do with it. Basically it seems destined to live in some awful middle-ground of mediocrity.

In fact, all signs point to it being just bad. Forget my fan perspective here. At least I already care about these characters already. I'm starting to think that this movie may be so bad that even if you hadn't seen the show and couldn't unfavorably compare the two, it STILL would be a shit movie that you wouldn't want to watch.

No.68509
>>68507

Complaining doesn't validate the complaining, either.

It's not the show.

Stop expecting it to be the show.

Expect it to be something reminiscent at best and totally wat at worst.

>>68508

>seems like he's cherry picking

So you're criticizing him for taking artistic direction with the movie he's directing?

No.68510
>>68509 the problem is he is not an artiist he is a hack

No.68511
>>68509

I wasn't expecting it to be the show, I knew it was going to be different just from the change of format, but this is taking a radical enough departure that as an adaptation it's become unappealing to me.

I imagine this is on par with making a Spider-man movie, giving him 8 limbs, and citing "well, it's not the comic book" as a defense. Or better yet, since it's a real world example, the Superman movie script that producer Jon Peters had Kevin Smith write (No Superman suit, no flying, and he has to fight a giant Spider.) Yes, it's separate, but maybe it shouldn't be so separate, not with something that had aired it's finale not but a few months before this project went underway. Peters eventually got it kinda right when he was the producer on Superman Returns, but even *he* said something along the lines of "I didn't understand Superman the first time around, I kept wanting to do somehting like Star Wars."

I don't care that it's not the show because it's not, but since this is supposed to be an adaptation, I would appreciate some respect. I want them to respect the idea that it was a fantasy world that revolved around Asian and Inuit cultures by using people of the ethnicities it was based on. I want them to respect that this was actually quite unique and not simply "almost copied entirely from martial art movies."

I'm fine with artistic direction and interpretation, but not when it's so blatant and arbitrary.

And in the end, the charges agaisnt this movie are valid, regardless of whatever the state of racism in this country supposedly is.

No.68512
I think the bottom line is that everyone has to ask themselves, "At what point does this stop being an adaptation and start being something that only shares names with the thing I like."

And, this is hardly the first time a fan has had to deal with this question. Simply citing that there are artistic liberties at work overlooks the point that there needs to be a line at which point liberties shouldn't be taken. And, history has shown us that adaptations of successful products always fare better when that line is drawn sooner rather than later.

No.68513
>>68509
>So you're criticizing him for taking artistic direction with the movie he's directing?

He can take all the artistic direction he wants. But so far, his choices tell me that he's misguided at best and an outright hack at worst.

I AM actually trying to judge the movie on its own merits. But the things he's decided to change have created a new entity that I find alternately unappealing and offensive. This would be true if it were an original film -- I just wouldn't care as much in that case.

No.68514
>>68506
I so badly want you to watch Dragonball Evolution. That was taken in a bold new artistic direction, much like how Shaymalan is taking this series.

No.68518
>>68514

That's actually a great example of where I see this headed.

The Dragonball series' fans love it in a similar fashion that we love Avatar.

Dragonball was never meant to be a live-action movie. The action, characters, acting, visual style, and even the way the story progresses were not intended for live, human actors to portray with live, real props filmed in live, actual locations.

Hollywood took decades to notice how popular the show was to realize "hey, there's lots of people who would pay to see this." As always, they completely missed the point and the movie was trash. This had next to no effect on how much the original series rocked.

Say the same for Watchmen. That movie turned out well; the fundamental difference being that it was made by fans for fans.

I figure Shymalan is somewhere in the middle of that spectrum. I don't think he's looking to cash in, but I also don't think he's a true fan.

It's a horrible lost opportunity to appreciate Asian culture through this adaptation, that is no doubt, but consider how poorly Asian-inspired films not starring Jackie Chan, Jet Li, or Chow Yun Fat have fared in the American market. Pair that with how notoriously low returns are for children/family movies. Then consider how many people who weren't fans of the original show would give two shits even if it kept the Asian-inspired cultural elements.

Ultimately, this seems to be aimed towards people who have never heard of Avatar: the Last Airbender. I don't think that makes disregarding many respectable choices made in the original show acceptable, I just think that makes it a different creature.

It's not the Avatar we know. That's the only thing that's clear to me by this point. Everything else seems to be bad phraseology and ambiguous choices.

No.68523
This thread, TL:DR.

No.68528
>>68518
Ninja, I'll give you props for trying to be the devil's advocate, but your statements on the whole matter seem so contradicting and nonsensical that it's pretty hard to figure out what you're actually trying to say here

No.68529
>>68518

Um...I think this is the part where you say any of that is necessarily a good thing, or actually take a stand.

We fully understand. This isn't Avatar: The Last Airbender, it stopped being that a long time ago, this is M. Night Shyamylan's The Last Airbender.

But what does that leave us exactly? You haven't made an argument for why this is somehow better for us or the general movie audience.

Also this bugged me:
>It's a horrible lost opportunity to appreciate Asian culture through this adaptation, that is no doubt, but consider how poorly Asian-inspired films not starring Jackie Chan, Jet Li, or Chow Yun Fat have fared in the American market. Pair that with how notoriously low returns are for children/family movies. Then consider how many people who weren't fans of the original show would give two shits even if it kept the Asian-inspired cultural elements.

How well are family movies supposed to do exactly? Plenty of movies of any genre fail or perform under expectations all the time, family movies don't have some sort of special stigma, otherwise stuff like Toy Story, Up, Spy Kids, or the first Harry Potter movies wouldn't be rip-roaring successes.

At the same time, having few Asian stars is also a product of the system that keeps few of them in lead roles. Stuff like the Joy Luck Club and Better Luck Tomorrow did just fine in the box office.

Besides, how many times have we heard the pro-casting argument that you should go for the better actors before the mediocre minority ones? Again, it makes the assumption you can't have your cake and eat it, too, but also falls into a system where minority actors are held to a higher standard of performance (not sure if that's a pun) than white ones. When you do that, of course the amount of opportunities drop, and with it, the amount of Asian actors other than the current A-List. Dev Patel shouldn't have had to have been in a movie that swept the Oscars to star opposite a kid that was given acting lessons so he could be in the movie, a billionaire heiress with no acting experience, and an extra from the Twilight films.

And in the end...what are you arguing for? You've jumped back and forth with both pro and anti (mostly pro) movie arguments and what for? Where is the Devil's Advocate act supposed to get you? Where is it supposed to get us?

No.68531
>>68512
This is better than anything I could have said to the same effect. It's basically at the point where one has to question whether that license means 2 scraps of dog crap on the end of a boot to the people making this.

And beyond even that, ignoring the license and examining what I know of the film otherwise; it just looks like shit.

Schlocky throwaway garbage is what all the various tales and facets of the process revealed to us point to. A bad memory in some younglings' recollections a few years off. Everything we've seen points to just another pile of crap splurted out by the now finely tuned Hollywood money machine.

This is actually more distressing considering what a vehicle more closely aligned with the original show could've been: Asian and Non-white actors getting center stage. A kung fu film (essentially) that treats its' arts with some degree of respect, possibly spirituality, rather than using it as an excuse to plow through hordes of nameless thugs. A fully realized world with Asian and Inuit influences and culture.

The reason we are so adamant in comparing it to the show is because the show was good. Better than good, it was great. It was unique, original, and managed characterization better than most animes and pretty much every other childrens' show it was competing with. There was nothing not to like outside of personal taste.

To see it so blithely ignored, abandoned in favor of the "tried and true" method, is so stupid it's borderline painful. And that ignorance is the exact reason why it'll suck: it attempts nothing new. And in light of the ignorance of the license I fail to see how it could ever stand up past the level of mediocrity. Mediocrity stretches credibility for the endeavor right now.

Ninja it's funny you bring up Dragonball Evolution. Caise that movie sucked. That was straight-to-DVD levels of suckage, with almost no redemption. I'm going to have to take your word that there are Dragonball fans out there who liked it; hardly a stretch of the imagination if their sole realm of enjoyment was Dragonball Z.

No.68535
I think what Ninja is saying is that we should accept the movie for what it is. A piece of trash that's probably not going to be worth watching, and is Avatar related in name only. But, it's one that doesn't affect the actual show in any way, so that makes it okay.


...Except that's clearly wrong. Since no one, least of all Paramount, is going to make a movie with this kind of budget and not milk it for all its worth, whereas they might not care so much about animation.

All the Avatar stuff to come out post show now is likely going to take more from the movies than it does the show. Games? They'll be following the movie plot. Action figures? I wouldn't be at all surprised if the first official Katara and Suki toys we get are movie based rather than the show. We already know for a fact that they're doing a manga prequel that, surprise surprise, is based on the movie's visual aesthetic rather than the shows. And hey, whose to say that we won't FINALLY get some kind of animated sequel to the series, or a spinoff or TV special, only to find that it too, has been based off of the movie.

Yes, as a fan you have the right to pick and choose what stuff you recognize as canon and support. But for the most part, executives never think as fans, and are going to try and shovel what they think is the most profitable crap onto people. A bad movie CAN hurt a franchise as a whole. Especially since, no matter how bad or generic it is, some people will still eat that crap up.

No.68559
I hate that the things we loved most about the show are being skimped on, entirely changed, or completely left out, but I don't actually know what any of that actually means at this point.

Sokka being "grounded" and taking out the "slapstick stuff" could mean anything. Racially dividing the four nations and the main cast being white could turn out either way. While most of that makes me doubtful of the film's integrity as a fan and as someone who just wants to see a great movie, I have faith in Shyamalan and associated producers, writers, composers, etc. I can't conceive the possibility of putting Shyamalan (The Sixth Sense, Signs, Unbreakable) as director with Kathleen Kennedy (E.T., Indiana Jones, Back to the Future), Frank Marshall (The Land Before Time, the Bourne series, Benjamin Button), and Sam Mercer (Congo, Van Helsing, Jarhead) as producers in a film with a cinematographer like Andrew Lesnie (Lord of the Rings trilogy, King Kong, I Am Legend) edited by Conrad Buff (The Abyss, Terminator 2, True Lies) with the music scored by James Newton Howard (Waterworld, Nolan's Batman films, Defiance) all with art directors Robert Fechtman [/spoiler](Starship Troopers, Jurassic Park III, Memoirs of a Geisha)[/spoiler] and Richard Johnson (G.I. Jane, O Brother, Where Art Thou?, Big Fish) and production designer Gerald Sullivan (Sleepy Hollow, Planet of the Apes, Minority Report) ending up with a bad movie.

The choices to drop or change aspects of the show breaks my heart, but it can still be a great movie that gets people attracted to the source material. Fans of the movies waiting for the next movie will be interested in watching the show during the year-long wait. They'll buy the DVDs. Sales will go up for Avatar: the Last Airbender, possibly prompting a renewal of the show.

That is what I'm hoping will happen.

No.68564
>>68559

You are my hero.

No.68565
>>68564
>you're my hero

For what, exactly? Making excuses for the bad decisions of Hollywood executives?

I will agree that increased DVD sales and the accompanying new fans will be one inarguably good thing to come out of this -- the series will stay in print, which is more than can be said for a lot of television animation. That huge all-series box that's coming out will definitely sell more copies than it otherwise would.

But if you're hoping for a series renewal, you should pay closer attention to what people are saying about movie-canon taking over. If Nick DOES decide to pay for such a thing, it will almost definitely be based on the films instead of the original show. If you're hoping to get more, new show-based content out of this you're going to be disappointed. The Nick Magazine people can't even seem to convince DelRey/Nick to publish a book of the show-based comics that have ALREADY BEEN MADE AND PAID FOR and are instead working on two "manga" spinoffs of the movie. Why would a new animated series, which is much more expensive and a much bigger risk to take, be any different?

No.68569
>>68559
Still trying your best to convince yourself that this movie won't flop hard and isn't directed by one of the biggest hacks to ever get behind a camera, eh Ninja?

Listing past successes ( wow did you really just list Congo, and Van Helsing like they were good movies, lol) like that automatically means this will be good. It just barely resembles Avatar at all. Every new piece of info that comes out points to this being another DBZ type failure. Shame too because if they actually had gotten people who gave a shit about the source material as opposed to " my Daughter is a fan, so i decided to direct it" we might have had a great movie based on the Avatar universe. What a fucking waste.

No.68573
File: 12533976139.gif-(5.85KB, 220x1066, ah.gif)
68573
>>68559
>Signs
>Van Helsing
>Waterworld
>Jurassic Park III
>Memoirs of a Geisha
>G.I. Jane
>Planet of the Apes

No.68574
>>68559
Ninja, everyone you listed, ESPECIALLY Shamaylan, have bad movies on their resumes. Interestingly enough in the case of the producers, those bad movies are usually his!

And this, of course, ignores the fact that it's entirely possible for someone that made good movies to have gotten complacent and start making crap. Again, we need only look at the works of Shaymalan to know that. It's like, as a filmmaker, he's devolving into some sort of ape.

Also, interesting how the actors, the ones we'll actually be seeing on the screen for a minimum of 90 minutes, aren't listed. Maybe because we all know that the protagonists are all pretty much unknowns with nothing worthwhile on their resumes and there's no way to selectively list only the good stuff?

All the good directing in the world -and I'm not saying that Shamalyan is a good director- isn't going to help crap acting. And as far as the production design goes, you might have had a point except that we already know that again, they're distancing themselves from the show as much as possible with the production design. Same thing with the cinematography. No matter how good you are with a camera, you can't shoot the characters as having been better played.

Oh, and being a producer just means you're writing checks. It doesn't necessarily mean you know a damn thing about how to make a movie or even how to cast it. Again, look up Jon Peters sometimes. Or, hell, just look at THIS MOVIE.

No.68576
File: 125340090665.png-(62.82KB, 653x468, trufax.png)
68576
>Shlyamn is a shit direct lolol amirite guise? tweest tweest hahahahaahh ROFL XD!!11

Yeah, but where's your proof?

No.68578
>>68576

Did you actually just compare MNS to GEORGE FUCKING LUCAS and expect any of us to take him MORE seriously?

Personally, I don't doubt that TLA will make enough at the box office to be considered an "success" because it will look pretty and contain magic kung fu and fuck, Transformers 2 made HOW MUCH money? People will watch a lot of dumb, flashy shit.

None of this is even a PAPER-THIN argument for TLA being a movie I have any interest in watching, which is the only thing I care about.

No.68579
>>68576

Yes, but 24 cents per dollar isn't the same as 21 cents per dollar when you're dealing with millions. At the same time, Geroge Lucas had the existing Star Wars fanbase to fall on.

Besides, a movie's gross isn't indicative of it's quality. His movies have been profitable yes, but there's a reason his name is synonymous with poor filmmaking, just like George Lucas's.

Thing is, none of M. Night's movies have carried the stigma The Last Airbender has, I'm optimistic enough of the protest movement to be affect this.

(Though what is Peter Jackson's or Robert Rodiguez's Average Cost of Production? They're the kings of low budget, high return flicks.)

No.68580
>>68576
The average Micheal Bay movie makes a fuck ton of bank in the movies as well, guess he's a great director now to amirite? Oh yeah, Transformers 2 was a fucking masterpiece!

No.68581
>>68579
>(Though what is Peter Jackson's or Robert Rodiguez's Average Cost of Production? They're the kings of low budget, high return flicks.)

They are also far superior directors.

No.68582
I'm comforting myself with the fact the even the tiny trailer we've seen looks like shit. Aang's kung-fu was weak, the CGI looked lame, and WTF, the Avatar has time to play around with candles when the entire fucking Fire Navy is attacking him?

No.68583
>>68579

>Lucas had the existing Star Wars fanbase to fall on

Yeah, that's actually indicative of Shyamalan being even more successful than Lucas than the 0.03 c/p illustrates. Star Wars had a dedicated momentum significantly larger than that of Shyamalan's unrelated films. Would that momentum have been removed or equalized, the 0.03 gap separating the two careers would be even smaller.

>movie's gross isn't indicative of its quality

As a fan, I agree. As a venture capitalist, it's all that matters. We aren't arguing against fans, we're arguing against the capitalists controlling the movie's direction.

>[Shyamalan's] name is synonymous with poor filmmaking

Opinion.

>none of M. Night's movies carried the stigma TLA does

Well I declare, it's almost as if this racism stuff just came out of the blue!

>Peter Jackson and Robert Rodriguez's c/p

Under what parameters? Ex: a particular span of years, a specific list of movies, types of movies?

>>68580

Michael Bay is a fantastic director if you think about it.

What do the masses want to see? Explosions, sexy women (preferably sweaty or wet in some other fashion), and sarcastic male protagonists. What does Bay deliver? Exactly that. He knows his audience and they know him. It works.

>>68578

Well if you already know what you'll think of the movie (even though you haven't seen it, read any reviews by critics, heard the opinions of other fans of it, and have nothing to base that opinion on other than stacked speculation), that's great for you!

No.68586
>>68583

Wait, please excuse my confusion, but didn't you just tell me "If George Lucas hadn't made Star Wars, then Shyamylan would be more successful than him?"

Isn't that kind of a silly argument to make? That's like getting second place in a race, or not breaking a track record, and claiming it's because other guy ran faster.

The Last Airbender carries a stigma because he's adapted an existing work that featured primarily Asian or Inuit characters, and then made the decision (Or allowed the production company to make the decision) to hire white actors for the heroes and leave the minorites as villains and side-characters, just like Hollywood has always done. This isn't some "out of nowhere" deal, it's happened before, and financial decisions made by "capitalists" aren't some inherent justification for this.

Understand that everybody wants a good movie to come out of this, but the focus of the protest movement is opposition to the casting and production decisions. In a way, the final quality of the movie is utterly irrelevant, because decisions made so far have offended people, a lot of people.

And no, he's not known for his earlier, better, films anymore. Shyamylan's name doesn't bring to mind The Sixth Sense, or Unbreakable, it brings up the whole "tweest" thing seen in The Village, and Signs. Or it brings up The Happening, a film he half-admits was *meant* to be B-movie campy. Why does the critical success of his *past* movies matter any more than the box office performance, and how is it relevant to anything dealing with his current movies? His most recent movies have gotten mixed reviews at absolute best, even if they at least managed to break even, but it still doesn't make them good movies, it doesn't mean this one will be good, either.

How many people remember Speilburg's 1941? or Michael Cimino's Heaven's Gate? Great directors, but these two movies helped end a Hollywood era, even if 1941? was smiply not as successful as Hollywood excecs had wanted.

So if this movie isn't the Avatar we know, and is offensive to people for various reasons, why bother supporting it at all?

For the always divided fandom? The vague, and so far, unfounded, hope that they won't push the cartoon, and it's related content, off the priority list?

No.68597
>>68583
>Michael Bay is a fantastic director if you think about it.
I thought about it. He sucks.

No.68599
>Michael Bay is a fantastic director if you think about it.

I'd say his directing skills are on par with his math skills. Let's check his basic math...
5-1+1=6

See that, I've scientifically proven Micheal Bay is, in fact, not a good director. And you can't argue with science.

No.68601
>>68599
Except it's
5-1+2

Ravage ejected Herr Doktor while underwater.

Scientifically proving that you don't notice things that happen right in front of you.

No.68607
I'm a little worried that Roku's role hasn't been filled yet. All the possible outcomes I can think of aren't good at all.

Either Shaymalan is saving the role for himself, or they're going to minimize and/or write Roku out entirely. They might be downplaying the past lives, or replacing him with that nondescript mentor dragon.

No.68609
>>68601
Sorry to drag this off subject again but...
>Ravage ejected Herr Doktor while underwater.

>Scientifically proving that you don't notice things that happen right in front of you.

Except there's no way a robot the size of a beer can would show up on radar.

No.68613
File: 125347336486.jpg-(13.27KB, 250x327, 250px-Ben_Cooke.jpg)
68613
>>68607

There were rumors that Ben Cooke, a stuntman, and the fight coordinator for the movie, was gonna play him. It's listed as such on IMDB, and giving that a quick glance, it's also the first time Cooke will be in a movie and actually play a named character, everything else is either unnamed, or it's stuntwork.

Which, if true, means two things. One, M. Night thankfully won't take the role for himself (I guess he learned after Lady in the Water.) Two, the only Fire Nation protagonist (except maybe Jeong Jeong, if a guy who shows up twice in the whole of the show counts) of the first movie/season is being played by a white man, and the enemy Fire Nation guys are still brown.

(Don't give me shit about Zuko and Iroh, I know Iroh is not a bad person and Zuko eventually redeems himself, but they're still the bad guys of the first season. Iroh still wasn't helping the Gaang behind Zuko's back, the only time he actually fought alongside them was in the Spirit Oasis during the season finale.)

No.68618
>>68609
But you would expect the equipment being used by the group monitoring the alien robots underwater to have equipment, most likely designed by the Autobots, to detect robots underwater.

No.68629
>>68618

I don't know, a B-2 Spirit stealth bomber shows up on radar with all the signature of a small bird, and the next gen verison will supposedly show up with the profile of a mosquito, and that's with something optimized to work against radar, and even then, you'd expect super-advanced robots to have *something* to hide them.

That said, one, I haven't Transformers 2. Two, Michael Bay's demographic appeal or the finnancial success of his movies is still no indication of the quality of his movies.

Three, what does this have to do with anything?

No.68665
>>68518
>I don't think he's looking to cash in
LOL

Ninja, do you even hear yourself anymore? Your Devil's Advocate arguments have done nothing to make us feel any better about the movie. I guess reality will only hit you after you actually go see it, and by that time, it will be too late. They'll have your hard earned money and you will have wasted two hours of your life. We warned you, but you didn't want to listen.

No.68669
>>68665
Ninja's arguments are all over the place. On one hand MNS clearly isn't in it to make a profit. On the other hand, his attempts to ape Star Wars are okay because his movies have been profitable!

No.68677
  Movie has not yet come out. Stop reviewing it.

<--- re: Thread

No.68678
>>68677
>ZOMG TL:DR!!!1!!!

I will never understand people's need to advertise that they were too lazy to read something.

Contribute some succinct content of your own or fuck off, anon.

>Movie's not out yet! Stop reviewing it!

I don't see how discussing the information we have about the film in an annoyed way is any worse than those ASN kids spazzing over "Devko." Please give us a list of approved discussion points so we can do a better job in the future! After all, this board exists solely for your personal entertainment!

No.68681
Look, I'm not going to be picky. Just do some research and get news and clips and gab about them and how they might play out on the big screen. I'm sick of hearing "This movie will suck because of X"

And yes the thread is TL;DR. Where have you been we've gone through three threads as it is, and I say let's get on to the next one.

No.68682
>>68681

This thread isn't even 400 posts long, un-stickying it will bring it to the front page the moment somebody posts.

I don't know why there's always the push for a new thread, is somebody out there hoping to stop seeing an actual discussion about this by cleaning out what was said time and again? Is it really how long a thread is, or just because you dislike what is said?

If you're sick of hearing why we're disliking what we're hearing, do two things. Stop assuming we'll talk about what you want us to talk about, and shift blame to the production for giving so few of us anything at all to be optimistic for.

No.68683
Okay. Here's a specific thing to discuss in further detail:

Those leaked script pages suggest that Firebenders can't conjure flame of their own, and instead will have to rely on pre-existing fires in order to bend. Does anyone else feel like that will hugely underpower Firebending?

I can understand the thinking behind that kind of decision - all of the other nations have to use existing material - but fire is a completely different "element" than the others to begin with. Water, Earth and even Air have substance and exist as physical entities, whereas Fire is a chemical reaction. I, a non-bender in the real world, can create Fire very easily as long as I have something to burn, but no one can pull Air or Water or Earth out of nowhere. It makes sense to me that the element of Fire in the Avatar universe would have slightly different rules, since it's a fundamentally different animal anyway.

Also, as I think someone pointed out, this change creates a universe in which the Fire Nation could be completely fucked over by an ill-timed rain storm combined with some moderately talented Waterbenders. If all of your torches are put out and your flints and tinder are soaked through, what can you do? Maybe they've invented some chemical way to create fire that will work even in a damp environment? But you'd think that by the time they figured that out, the other nations would have already dominated them completely.

No.68685
>>68683
From a story telling point it seems kind of like a bad idea. I mean, if you can disarm a firebender, they're not nearly as dangerous. I mean, how many times did Katara freeze one of them, or Toph bind them with rocks, only to have them melt their way out? If they can't always make fire, then aren't there going to be way more times when they're just not a threat?


...And...damn. This means we're going to miss out on Iroh doing his Dragon of the West demonstration, doesn't it?

No.68686
>>68683
Katara can easily pull off huge moves with the contents of a waterskin. I imagine firebenders would get a similar fudge in their favor by being able to bolster flames against being extinguished, and chain attacks by boosting and redirecting fire rather than letting it fade away while they bend a new attack.

No.68687
>>68685

If the leaked script turns out to be legit and they do go in that vein, I imagine that more experienced masters such as Iroh (possibly Azula and maybe Zuko?) can turn more obscure sources of heat into flame.

Ex: steam off of tea, rays of the sun, heat from their breath, etc.

That would be all kinds of awesome and dramatic.

No.68698
>68687

We saw Sozin redirect the heat of lava into a visible streak of heat, but do you really think something as lame as the heat of a hot cup of tea or a dude's breath is at all effective? "Ow, you kinda scalded me, oh wait, it's just kinda red, but that hurt!"

Especially if it's limited to masters like Iroh, as is, what's the point?

They probablly just have a torch bearer, or some sort of thing sitting around on the ship with a fuel that doesn't easily get put out, like pitch, or even just a big lantern somebody lugs around.

No.68700
>>68698
...That would have to suck. If you're the lantern guy for the squadron? Everyone is going to be gunning for you first.

No.68701
>>68700

Hey, this is Nation that thought it was a good idea to shoot fire catapaults up the cliff their men were climbing, there's nothing at all saying that the Fire Nation doesn't have horrible tactics and the world is only humoring them.

No.68703
Dude, I'd just put a sterno in my armor, and light that shit going into battle. Imagine a thousand soldiers marching to war with flaming torches blazing above their shoulders.

No.68717
Firebenders can't make their own fire? Okay, I think that is a bad idea, but as for ways Firebenders could deal with that?

Two words.

Greek Fire.

No.68718
>>68717
Sure as hell won't be Asian!

No.68726
>>68717
Damn it...Just...damn it.
That idea is so awesome.
WHY IS THAT SO AWESOME!?

No.68729
>>68726

Because the idea kinda makes sense, and thus won't be in the movie.

zing!

No.68763
http://www.lastairbenderfans.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1253549562&archive=

>CraveOnline: Did you take anything from the animated form?

>Cliff Curtis: I’ve not watched it. I didn’t want to watch the animated form because I knew the director, M. Night, was going to depart from that.

RAEG TIEM

No.68764
>>68763
Wow. Even ignoring all that it could mean, isn't that a really dumb thing to say in an interview? Shouldn't Curtis be aware enough about how these things work to know that his saying that would alienate a potential audience?

No.68765
>>68763

I feel bad for Cliff. That show he's working on looks terrible.

No.68776
Well, fuck.
Brb, busy hanging myself over fandom.

No.68779
>>68764
>Shouldn't Curtis be aware enough about how these things work to know that his saying that would alienate a potential audience?

Well if they haven't already been alienated by all the other news about this clusterfu...er .. i mean "movie", then this shouldn't be too much of an issue.

No.68789
>>68717
I admit I had to google Greek Fire, but that is such an awesome idea. And it would fit with Curtis's description of his costume... maybe they'll actually use it. </indomitable optimism>

No.68811
>>68789

And it would screw over Waterbenders. So, so, so hard. If they incorporated something like that, as a show of the Fire Nation's technical superiority, that would be cool.

I have the feeling that they may be going for a 'the Fire Nation has forsaken the true path', but instead of focusing on anger and aggression exclusively, it'll be more critical of the Fire Nation's industrial-level technology?

Or am I giving these guys too much credit?

No.68813
>>68811
>it'll be more critical of the Fire Nation's industrial-level technology?
I may be hallucinating (or confusing this with something Bryke said) but I think I remember some comments from Shamading about some Miyazaki influence, so that fits.

Ok, I found the quote:
>"I was drawn to the series because of its influences: one being Hayao Miyazaki, said Shyamalan. "I've always been a huge fan of Miyazaki's work. He is one of the greatest storytellers in the world and makes anime films in Japan. His combination of spirituality and super natural elements have brought depth and meaning to his art form. In 'The Last Airbender,' I see an opportunity to make a live-action version of a Miyazaki film."

This movie can still be good, just different from the series.

No.68829
>>68813
...Avatar was already pretty inspired by Miyazaki and Ghibli films. Appa is a ripoff of Catbus, for crying out loud!

Also, this depends on Shaymalan having some grasp on delivering a story with depth and meaning. Go watch Lady in the Water, and see if that sounds like him.

No.68842
I want an interview with Shayamalans daughter. If there's anyone who can give us the inside track on this it's the Sham-houses biggest, truest Avatar fan.

No.68846
>>68842
>truest fan

But then you have to ask 'What is a fan?', which is a question impossible to answer. Fandom is expressed in as many ways as there are fans, so who are you to decide what constitutes a 'True Fan'?

No.68853
>>68846
In this case? Someone that likes the show for its own merits, and not for the potential to be the next Star Wars?

No.68856
>>68846

>What is a fan?

A miserable little pile of secrets.

>>68829

Lady in the Water is Shyamalan bitching and moaning about how critics don't like him. He did decently well at infusing a story with meaning in "Signs," but Avatar is not an ideology vehicle. I would be depressed if it turns into a boring-ass Miyazaki-fest of INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY IS BAD U GAISE :[.

In Avatar, the problem with the Fire Nation's hyper-industrialized craziness is not that they're industrial, it's that they're out of touch with the natural world and destroy it at whim to fuel their war machine. I hope (nonfacetiously) that Shyamalan has enough sense to realize that. He's not retarded. He just has his head pretty far up his ass.

No.68859
>>68856
>I would be depressed if it turns into a boring-ass Miyazaki-fest of INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY IS BAD U GAISE :[.

That's basically what it is. The entire show portrays the Fire Nation as industrialized, population-brainwashing warmongers.

No.68861
>>68856

>Avatar is not an ideological vehicle
>Miyazaki
>boring

YOU SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH

No.68868
>>68813
>This movie can still be good
If you change the shitty director most of the horrid casting, yeah it could be good indeed.

No.68869
>>68861
For once we are in total agreement.

No.68870
File: 125376826264.jpg-(66.15KB, 417x313, 1253409750537.jpg)
68870
Found this on /co/ last week, been meaning to post it

No.68930
>>68870
"I have destroyed the moon, John"

No.69012
>>68856
>the problem with the Fire Nation's hyper-industrialized craziness is not that they're industrial, it's that they're out of touch with the natural world and destroy it at whim to fuel their war machine.

How you can not consider those two things at least partially linked, I have no idea.

No.69042
>>68870

Needs muttonchops.

No.69068
File: 125404857191.jpg-(20.40KB, 225x334, jon-peters-71266976.jpg)
69068
>>68868
Just remember it could always be worse. ALWAYS.

No.69075
>>69068
I'd actually prefer Jon Peters at this point, because 1) he seems to have learned from Superman not to fuck with an established property, and 2) even if he hasn't, we'd get to see Aang fight a giant Spirit Spider. Koh was pretty insectoid already so it wouldn't be too bad.

No.69077
>>69075

"I don't want to see him in those robes, I don't wanna see him glide, and he's gotta fight a giant Spider in the third act."

Hey, if I can beat on a dead horse, using Ninja's earlier argument, Superman Reborn would have been directed by Tim Burton Nightmare Before Christmas, Batman, produced by Jon Peters Batman, An American Werewolf in London, written by Kevin Smith Clerks, Chasing Amy, Mallrats and star Nicholas Cage Face/Off, Con Air, The Rock.

(Edit: Or possibly starring Sean Penn, they only mentioned Nick Cage would be in it.)

Given what we know of how that was gonna turn out, could somebody in the late 90s have conceived the possibility of all that talent going in and ending up with a bad movie?

No.69097
>>68853
Does ANYBODY only like the show for its potential to be the next Star Wars? You've set reasonable standards, but are putting your expectations for those standards clear into the stratosphere.

No.69102
>>69097
Personally, I think it had that potential already and doesn't need to be made more generic and mainstream in order to tap said potential.

No.69106
>>69097
>putting your expectations for those standards clear into the stratosphere
Yeah, because hiring a cast of the appropriate race and trying not to dumb down the plot to just "Generic Boy Hero Saves the World with Motley Group of Friends" is asking waaaay too much.

No.69113
>>69106

But that's what the story was about in the cartoons.

No.69114
>>69113

If you completely generalize the story and don't mention anything unique or specific.

No.69118
>>69114
That's generally what you have to do when condensing a plot into one sentence. Or a movie.

No.69160
>>69118

Maybe for a short sentence, but for a movie, I'd expect changes to the story, not complete disregard to the original's aesthetics and selling points.

No.69174
>>69160
So, the selling points aren't what the characters do, but how they look?

No.69175
>>69174
Well generally when something is adapted from a comic, Video game, Cartoon, etc the fans tend to expect the characters to at least somewhat resemble their counterparts in the original story.

No.69176
>>69175
Like what? What adaptation has there been that hasn't drastically altered plot, characters, etc?

No.69178
>>69176

No good adaptation does it drastically, and no good adaptation does it so that it actually *offends* people. For the original Superman movies, they had the idea of this black suit with a Superman emblem that comes off and turns into throwing knives. Take a look at the first two Spider Man movies, especially if you compare it to James Cameron's half-assed early script before the project was picked up a few years later. The origin is still mostly the same, the look is still mostly the same, except maybe for Green Goblin's suit, but it's not that they made Spidey a classical pianist (heh, Legend of Chun Li.) It's minor nitpick, like organic webshooters, from what's otherwise a pretty decent transition from one format to another. At the same time, they were working off comics books in print for several decades, and had a lot of thinking to do about presentation, but nobody said "this is X in name only."

We can't speak too much for the story just yet, but it would have been nice if the movie had at least attempted to bring the same level of authenticity found in the cartoon's East Asian and Inuit world to the table, especially since it actually was very well defined, not even a year passed since the show had finished, and the fact that they had just *one* original show with a complete narrative to draw from.

And you know what? I bet we're still in for a surprise or two. I'm betting the movie is going to show us something that's going to be so different and out there, none of us were expecting it.

No.69179
>>69178
> it's not that they made Spidey a classical pianist (heh, Legend of Chun Li)

Damn it. Why'd you have to remind me of that? That change didn't even make sense! A cop working her dad's last case was a perfectly logical plot idea! It's actually more confusing to make her anything else!

No.69180
>>69176
Off the top of my head:

Nolan's Batman Films, Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight. Superman Returns, even though it followed things a little too closely when it came to paying homage to the Donner Films and the Silver Age. Arguably, the first two X-Men movies as well. I'm mentioning those especially because they had a director that actually got the point of, and respected the source material. (Since Bryan Singer and Ian McKellan are both gay, they understood part of the whole 'persecuted for who you are' thing that X-Men is about. They even based some scenes on being a mutant on their own experiences of coming out). Notice that the X-Men movies Singer wasn't attached two were far more generic and bland. It's not because of sequelitis. It's for this exact reason.

Oh, and Iron Man. Good lord, Iron Man. They could not have cast it better than RDJ as Tony Stark. Incredible Hulk as well, since they finally got it right and made a movie that balanced plot with Hulk Smash.

As far as video games go? Mortal Kombat (The first one, at least) and the two Tomb Raider films, mainly because they have the benefit of Tomb Raider being inconsistent with its plot and characterization anyway.

Oh. And the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle films. They're an interesting case because they were adaptions of different source material. The first movie is like the comics, whereas the next two draw from the 80's cartoon, and the CGI from the 2003 cartoon, exists in a sort of bubble, while still paying some homages to the preceding films.

Lord of the Rings. The Chronicles of Narnia. And I don't believe for a second that anyone can say those weren't Star Wars tier films in terms of how well they did.

And, again. That's just off the top of my head. I'm sure there's many more. It's NOT that hard to do an adaptation that follows its source material closer than The Last Airbender is.

No.69181
>>69180
Oh, and I'm pretty sure that Shaymalan either isn't a fan or is responsible for all these changes. Because it's entirely possible for a director to rail against executive meddling and win.

Hellboy was going to be about a guy that turned into a demon, like the Hulk. But the director (who was a *fan* there's that word again) said that if that happened, he was going to walk.

I wish Mike and Bryan were in a position to speak up, too. When Spielberg was attached to direct it? Haley Joel Osment was going to be Harry Potter, and the HP films were going to take place in America (and be animated, no less!) until Rowling demanded an all British cast. Considering how it's turned out, can we really say that shutting down a director's bad decisions, no matter how big name that director was, was a bad move?

No.69183
>>69178>>69180
Exactly! Those adaptations did make changes but they were very minor, and it stayed true to the spirit of the original source material. Especially in the case of the first two Spiderman flicks. Always helps when the Director is a fan of the material he's directing.

>>69181

>I wish Mike and Bryan were in a position to speak up, too. When Spielberg was attached to direct it? Haley Joel Osment was going to be Harry Potter, and the HP films were going to take place in America (and be animated, no less!) until Rowling demanded an all British cast. Considering how it's turned out, can we really say that shutting down a director's bad decisions, no matter how big name that director was, was a bad move?

Sucks that BRYKE doesn't have the same control over what they created like Rowling. If they did, i truly believe we would be seeing a much more faithful adaption.

No.69184
>>69180

>Nolan's Batman Films, Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight.

...Please tell me you're joking. Nolan's Hard-And-Gritty Batman universe is as far from the original Batman as you can get without hiring Adam West.

>the first two X-Men movies as well.

Right, because raping half of the backstories and ignoring the other half of the original character set is 'staying true to the original'. The original X-Men had Iceman as part of the X-Men (Issue fucking #1), not as a student for a school (another thing that wasn't in the original).

>Iron Man. Good lord, Iron Man.

Good god, Iron Man. Just because a bunch of people are cast correctly doesn't make it true to the source material. They changed a shitload to make it fit in with the modern era.



I'm not complaining about any of these, and you're right about them being good movies (Hulk I haven't seen, though), but they aren't all that faithful to the source material. Especially Spider-Man; the entire point of Peter Parker having mechanical webshooters was to show that he really is a fucking genius and not just a guy who does well in school. The movies basically make him into a slightly above-average smart guy. They're still good, but that's not Parker.

And really, considering how much anger there's been about racism in the Last Airbender cast, how about Samuel L. Jackson being cast as Nick Fury?

>>69181
DVD interviews; Shyamalan is a fan, and MnB were excited that he was directing the movie.

>>69183
They gave that control to Nick, and we've already seen what happens when you do that.

No.69185
>>69184

The interviews were still before anything at all about the movie was announced beyond "there will be a movie."

To bring up my point from earlier, remember that a lot of these comics had to adapt stories that were already decades established. Yes, Iceman was part of the original team, but that was also a story written in the 60s/70s, they took the idea of the school helping mutants learn about their powers from the more recent stories. Same with Iron man, Hulk and Spider-man. Would it honestly have worked if Tony Stark was still a Vietnam vet as a way to add in the shrapnel in his heart, or would they have tried to adapt that from modern storyline? The webshooter thing was what I'd mentioned about something of a minor nitpick, and it does still bother me, but at least he still had webs.

Also, the absolute original Batman stories by Bill Finger weren't anything like the camp of the stories after the Comics Code or during the Adam West series. Batman actually let a few people die back then, killed a few monsters, and at one point shot a vampire with a silver bullet (Robin even knocked one of the goons working for the guy who killed his parents off a half-built skyscraper.) Nolan was trying to bring something of a breath of realism back into the Batman movies, especially after Joel Schumacher made the movies rife with all the camp of the Adam West series.

And about Samuel L as Nick Fury? You do realize that making Nick Fury black was an idea from the Ultimate Marvel universe, right? They made Nick Fury black and specifically based him off Samuel L for The Ultimates way back in 2002. Hell they even asked Samuel L back then if they could do so. Considering that design has been around for 7 years, and it's the one they used for Ultimate Spider-Man, one of the more successful books Marvel has had recently, it's not such a leap of logic for them to use Samuel L for a live-action version of Nick Fury.

Nolan's, or anybody else's, re-interpretation aside, that still doesn't factor in one thing. The Last Airbender isn't adapting a decades old franchise, it's not working with stories that at some times literally restart their universes; it's adapting a cartoon that premiered in 2005 and ran until just last year. A departure from the source material is somewhat expected, but won't necessarily be a good thing for fans with the original so close in mind.

This is actually pretty similar to what they almost did to Neil Gaiman's Anansi Boys where Hollywood execs wanted to drop the magical elements altogether and change the lead protagonists to white kids instead of black kids.

Or if you want a hypothetical situation. Imagine if, after Gargoyles was canceled, there was a live-action movie announced, and they did something like dropping all the allusions to Shakespeare, and made it so that the movie was about a man named Goliath who gets hit with a curse that turns him to stone during the day.

No.69186
>>69185
Yes, I know about black Nick from Ultimate, and I know he was based off Sam. We aren't talking about alternate universes here, though, or people wouldn't be in such a fucking tizzy over how The Last Airbender is being handled.

No.69187
...Why did I use 'tizzy'?

No.69194
>>69184
In the case of the comic book adaptations, they're sort of cheating in that Batman, Spider-man, and the X-Men have all had some very different interpretations over the course of their franchise histories. Compare The Dark Knight Returns to some Silver Age Batman. BOTH are Batman. But they're complete opposites. You can bend a comic book movies really far without breaking them and still have them be true to canon. Avatar isn't like that, since there's just the cartoon. Anything to follow it should be based on the cartoon.

(Maybe two decades from now after the movies and another animated series we'll be more willing to accept changes, but that's just not how it is now.)

It's easier to accept the movies as alternate continuities because comic books are just that sort of medium. Sometimes Peter Parker is married, sometimes he's single. Sometimes Hulk is smart and speaks fluently, other times he's got the mentality of a 5 year old caveman. There HAVE been times that Batman has killed. Things change, often wildly, depending on what year it is and who's writing.

Iron Man especially is guilty of this. He'd be too old to be a Vietnam vet now as he was originally. Marvel's sliding timescale has made it so that he just got his injury in whatever the recent military conflict was. Seeing as how the movie universes take place ten years into the future, it makes sense that his origin was shifted the way it is. I guarantee you that by the next decade, they comics will join in and say Tony Stark got his injury in Iraq.

And as far as the DVDs go, Shaymalan might have said he's a "fan", but that's just something you say for publicity. In all actuality what we've seen is that he doesn't give a crap at best, and is looking to turn this into a homogenized hollywood cash cow in the vein of star wars (And really, if you were attempting to do that, couldn't you at least say you wanted to make it into Lord of the Rings?) at worst.

No.69195
>>69186
Ultimate Marvel is an alternate universe, but not in the sense that it's unrecognizable from the source material. If I go to my LCS, and pick up a book, there's a good chance I'll see Samuel L. Jackson Fury.

If I turn on TV and watch Avatar, regardless of what episode I watch, Katara and Sokka are going to have brown skin.

No.69197
>>69195
Because that's the only iteration so far, is the one where they have brown skin. Just like until Ultimate rolled around, Nick Fury was only ever a white guy.

No.69198
>>69197

Not really, there's been plenty of variations on Nick Fury. Originally, he wasn't the leader of S.H.I.E.L.D. he was a commando, which was sometimes a grunt in the field, and later on it became a sort of Spy, then he became the leader. Plus there's also the version in the MAX comic imprint. Fury's been around a long time, and he's changed during those times like crazy. Even Ultimate Nick Fury was different when he first showed up before they went the Samuel L route in The Ultimates. The changes were made because they were working with a brand new take on something quite old and established (Hell, they made Colossus gay.)

Once again, something that can't be said about Avatar. There's been one set iteration around for just 3 years. Every comic, every game, every episodes was set along set lines. Not a semi-niche market that often has difficulty bringing in new readers in the face of contant storylines and rolling timelines.

They had a set item, no different than a book, to work with, one that also had a lot of it's visual and cultural themes nailed down.

No.69203
>...Please tell me you're joking. Nolan's Hard-And-Gritty Batman universe is as far from the original Batman as you can get without hiring Adam West.
More like, are YOU joking? You do know the Dark Knight is mostly based on how the Joker first appeared in the original comics right?

No.69204
>>69187
Because it rhymes with titty?

No.69211
Did anyone notice that Jackson Rathbone went from pale ghost white to guido orange?

No.69214
>>69211
I just assumed that he wasn't wearing his Twilight makeup anymore and that the guido orange is his real skin tone. That entire movie is pretty washed out.

No.69216
File: 125440660542.jpg-(16.08KB, 266x305, poe.jpg)
69216
>>69181

>>Haley Joel Osment was going to be Harry Potter

No.69257
>>69185
>>69194
This and this, times a million.

No.69269
File: 125453071793.jpg-(808.87KB, 800x600, 1254528929392.jpg)
69269
I:^I

No.69270
I am seriously disappoint in Iroh's design.

I was waiting for the movie. I knew they wouldn't get Iroh's actor too fat. But I thought they would do SOMETHING to make him look old, feeble, and buffonish. It was one of the really nice details in the character designs in Fire Nation and their best benders was their contrast to Iroh.

Ozai's buff. Zuko was buff. Zhao's buff. While Azula isn't 'buff', she's shown as athletic. All the best firebenders are fit.

In contrast one of the supposedly best benders in the world is OBESE. You see hints of awesome but his soft design is SUCH a contrast to the others.Anyone who knows archetypes knew his weight and soft appearance would prevent him from being a kickass mentor.

Thin, wise, and elegant Movie!Iroh really makes me sad, though he does look related to Movie!Zuko. I know that Movie!Zhao is not going to be a man beast. Dev is SKINNY. I have no idea how Ozai and Azula will/would look.

I'm just... really BUMMED.

No.69271
>>69269

I saw that earlier...one, Ringer's costume looks terrible without any lighting, it's just kinda...costume-y.

Two, the scar is a little more visible than we thought...it also still looks odd, but oh well.

Three, I think that guy in the lower right is supposed to be Saun Toub...if that's Movie!Iroh, he looks like the bad guy from The Princess Bride.

No.69273
Iroh being fat and jolly was a huge part of his character...I don't know where they're going with this, but Toub in the lower right is somewhat reminiscent of Ghassan Massoud in Kingdom of Heaven.

It that turns out to be the case, awesome.

No.69295
File: 125454335871.jpg-(28.85KB, 149x259, optimism.jpg)
69295
>>69273

Wanna know who else he's reminiscent of?

Dr. Orpheus

Off topic, I couldn't remember the name at the time, but the six fingered man in The Princess Bride was named Count Rugen.

No.69300
>>69295
I CAN'T UNSEE IT.

Unfortunately, since he's not going to act with Bryon O's diction or the epic music, it's just not enough to make me like it again.

No.69301
>>69269

Okay, seriously. Let me pose a very serious question to all the people that still had hope in this movie.

Hypothetically, if you knew there was an Avatar movie being made, but didn't see any other pictures, and didn't have any idea who the actors were. If you just saw those pictures of Ringer and Toub with no text to accompany them, would you think this was the at all related the Avatar: The Last Airbender?

Because if your answer is "No" then from a purely aesthetic/production design point of view, this movie has failed as an adaptation.

No.69302
>>69301
They're goddam production stills. Meeting your stipulations, if you saw a picture of Christian Bale putting on a suit jacket, would you link it to Batman?

Answer: No.

"But wait! All of the characters in my scenario are in costume! It's not a fair comparison!" Yes, it is. Batman wears suits as Bruce Wayne.

Just go back to watching Batman, you ungrateful idiots.

No.69303
>>69302
>Just go back to watching Batman, you ungrateful idiots.

You see that right there? That's where you lost all credibility for your argument.

No.69304
>>69302
0/10.

And ignoring the fact that a suit is not a costume? The entire point of Bruce Wayne is to look like a harmless, innocuous businessman. In that regard, if he doesn't look related to Batman, it's intentional.

That's the entire point of having a secret identity. So that you DON'T look like someone important.

So, no, you fail at analogies.

No.69305
>>69302
>Just go back to watching Batman, you ungrateful idiots.

Good idea! I do believe I will go back to watching adaptations of properties that treat their source material with the slightest modicum of respect and the faith that they can stand on their own merits.

Even the Joel Schumacher movies are closer to Batman (Admittedly, a campy Adam West version with the homoeroticism turned up to 11) than this crap does to Avatar.

No.69306
>>69302

What...? Good lord, try harder, why don't you? A post like that, no wonder people get sick of this thread.

Those would just be ordinary clothes, you would say the same about the Michael Keaton movies, or any movie where people wear clothes, to define something as "Batman" it has to be a Batman suit. Likewise, none of this is reminiscent of the Tang Dynasty/Taisho Japan designed Fire Nation, and while Ringer's robe and Aang's clothing are based on the trappings of real Buddhist monks, the two are wearing robes of different styles, so the correlation isn't there, and Noah just comes off as a kid in an outfit.

A fair comparison would be something like BatBale's suit in The Dark Knight, but without the cape and pointy ears as being tough to identify as Batman.

TL;DR: Quit bein' Hurp Durp.

No.69307
>>69306
You know what's weird? Real Tibetan Buddhist monks actually wear brighter colors than movie Aang.

I'm actually more curious about the texture the costume seems to have. Is that just so it'll look a certain way on film? Because from the still photograph it looks like it was made from a quilt or something.

No.69309
>>69307

I theorize that his costume is made out of burlap or something else annoyingly itchy. This is why we have no pictures of Noah smiling!

(only half-kidding this time, damn that costume looks so uncomfortable)

No.69352
File: 125463021170.jpg-(65.93KB, 400x571, Oven_Mitt__Potholder___Hand_Towel.jpg)
69352
>>69307

THIS.

That kind of fabric looks quilted--which, sure, I guess that would be a "good idea" if the boy's living on top of a mountain, because really, Aang's outfit looked like he'd freeze his skinny butt off at high altitudes, but it looks like one of the potholders in my kitchen after I used it to mop up some bacon grease.

That said, I'll go back to happily enjoying the rest of you and your beautiful arguments, because it's really refreshing to read this kind of debate. I wish the customers at the comic book shop I work at were this intelligent and engaging.

No.69357
>>69352
(Mmm...mopped up bacon grease...)

I'm more curious as to how real monks function. I mean, a lot of the stuff with Tibetan Monks in fiction is drawn from reality, where they do in fact wear bright orange and practice kung fu (well, okay, Kung Fu and Buddhism) up in the mountains.

Is it just a matter of layers that keeps them from freezing?

No.69359
They have crazy magic that keeps them from freezing

No.69365
>>69269

Still trying to make up my mind about this movie. I'm backing down a bit on defending it, at least until we get a longer trailer.

I'm just going to snark at these pictures a bit.
Top left: I am Darth Zuko! I kill younglings and I don't like sand!
Top right: No, Mr. Bond. I expect them to die.
Bottom left: Okay, I give in. This guy should be playing Sokka.
Bottom right: The villian of this movie is obviously going to be Rasputin. That guy gets around.

No.69367
>>69357 you would be surprised at how well flowing garments regulate body temperature

No.69373
>>69365
I'm a little curious. As someone that has previously defended it, how do you feel about this?

Does this make you more for or against it than you were previously?

No.69389
File: 125469640654.jpg-(33.90KB, 316x302, TheSixFingeredIroh.jpg)
69389
Damn, that's uncanny.

No.69390
>>69389
Forgot to put my name.

Another thing I forgot to note. Why is Iroh wearing blue?

No.69393
>>69389

Oh...oh god...I'd heard the joke, but in the thumbnail I honestly thought that it was another photo of Toub in costume...

And why *is* he wearing blue? I thought the Fire nation was in mostly black and red.

Maybe it's purple? I think it was the sort of European or possibly Roman tradition that royalty wears purple, since it was expensive. In leiu of the supposed Grecco Roman Ozai outfit, that makes sense. But then, the Fire Nation also has a pagoda, and purple in East Asian cultures is the color only worn by priests.

And it still doesn't change the fact that he looks like a wizard.

No.69397
>>69393
>And why *is* he wearing blue? I thought the Fire nation was in mostly black and red.

...You mean the tan water tribe clothing and Aang's desaturated costume didn't clue you in? They're not doing the color coded nation outfits anymore.

No.69398
Fools! Clearly that is a photo of young Iroh when he was leading the siege at Ba Sing Se. We're all just being trolled by Entertainment Weekly.

No.69399
>>69397

I was talking about Dev Patel wearing black and red robes in that one shot of him surrounded by flames, or his black armor in all the other shots. The water tribe clothes are just leather in this movie, but these were supposed to be Fire Nation military uniforms, a color scheme might just make sense when you want to broadcast that you belong to a certain army.

No.69418
File: 125472502911.png-(536.95KB, 796x780, Airbender_Disappoint.png)
69418
>>69269

No.69426
>>66988
Ty Lee and Zhao, they kinda looked eastern-european or something.

No.69437
I don't need to excuse myself for not liking the teaser and promotional photos.
I'm not watching The Last Airbender, because I didn't watch Dragonball Evolution.
An image is worth a thousand words.


Well, I'm lying, I might watch The Last Airbender, but no way I'm paying for it.

No.69439
>>69437

I'm hoping it'll be leaked early just so I can watch it without paying and feel even smugger about it.

No.69447
>>69437
>>69439
At this point, if you still intend on paying for a movie ticket instead of just waiting for it to show up online, you're probably a little crazy and nothing will stop you from wasting your money.

No.69461
>>69426
LOL

No.69465
>>69373
Well, it is better than putting Sean Toub in a fatsuit and at least the basic design sorta resembles Iroh's costume...but it's gonna be hard for me to think of this guy as Iroh. So I say it breaks even.

>>69390
Actually, other versions of this I have seen it looks more black. I guess it's the light reflecting off the magazine page that makes it look blue.

>>69447
Other than the fact that the big screen always looks about a million times better than a dinky window on my computer? Sure, you'd have to be cr

No.69466
>>69465
*crazy.

Hit submit too soon.

No.69467
>>69465

...That doesn't even closely resemble Iroh's original design.

Also, whether on a 50 foot screen, or an instance of Winamp, how well you're able to see a movie doesn't change the quality of the movie itself.

I'm with the camp that if I see it, I'm either sneaking into the theater, or pirating it. I've got better things to blow $7.50 on.

No.69468
>>69467
>I'm with the camp that if I see it, I'm either sneaking into the theater, or pirating it. I've got better things to blow $7.50 on.
$10.50 were i live. It will be quite the frigid day in hell when i spend that much on a M. Night flick. Sneaking into see it free would take much more effort than this cluster-fuck of a movie deserves. I'll either get it for free online or simply wait until it comes to cable.

No.69469
>>69468

Student rate at the theaters here is $7.50, $10.50 is general admission.

All things considered, what are the chances of a script leak, or a workprint leak like what happened with the Wolverine movie?

No.69471
>>69467
Look at the shoulders. Double epaulets. That's what I mean by "sorta resembles."

No.69472
>>69467

One more thing I thought of after I hit submit. Despite my comment, I most likely will not be seeing it in theaters, and waiting for it to come out on DVD. Heck, possibly if the reviews were really bad I'll wait to see it on TV.

We have a big screen, flat screen, HDTV with a really good cable package that includes several premium channels with a DVR and HD channels. Next best thing to the theater.

I am mystified as to how this can be as the only perceivable source of income in our household is my stepmother's teaching salary. I theorize my dad sells drugs.

No.69473
It seems a little early to say whether or not you'd pay to see it...the trailer isn't even out...

No.69476
>>69473

Um...hello? Moral opposition to the casting since January here?

No.69480
>>69468
>It's going to be bad, therefore I'm not doing anything illegal or immoral by watching it without paying for it.

My god, you've got almost as much an unwarranted sense of entitlement as gamers.

No.69481
>>69480
Welcome to the internet.

No.69485
>>69480
If it were going to be good, we'd pay for it. Eagerly.

But since we can't just go to the ticket stand and say "This movie sucks, I want my money back", and the way fandom works is that if we don't see it our opinions on it sucking will be considered invalid for purposes of discussion, we've arrived at something of a catch-22.

Either pirate and confirm our suspicions, or don't and forever wonder. Either way? Shamalyan and Paramount aren't seeing a single damn cent.

No.69487
>>69485

If critics and fans love it, would you pay to see it?

No.69489
>>69487
>If critics and fans love it
>M Night Shyamalan
HA!

No.69490
>>69480
>My god, you've got almost as much an unwarranted sense of entitlement as gamers.

Sense of entitlement? Yeah i feel entitled to seeing a good movie when i put down well over ten bucks for it. So naturally me paying actual money to see a movie directed by M Night Shyamalan is pretty much out of the question. That's why god created cable TV.

No.69494
>>69487
We're talking about a director that literally put a film critic character into a movie just to kill him off, because he hates the fact that he's getting worse and worse reviews. Oh, and in this same movie he himself played a writer whose works would eventually lead mankind into a golden age. It's amazing how he can hold a camera when his fists are made of such big hams.

But seriously? This movie would have to do a complete 180 for a significant amount of fans to like it for me to take their word for it. Every single piece of news that's come out about this has, at best, been met with "It might not be that bad".

You don't go from that to awesome in less than a year.

No.69495
>>69494

I think you take Lady in the Water's plot too literally...

Better question: if I said it was awesome, would you see it?

No.69496
>>69495
...How else am I supposed to take it?

Shamalyan LITERALLY plays a character that's a struggling writer, who puts together a book of his thoughts on politics. The titular character explains that his character is a visionary and that his writing will literally change the world.

One of the main antagonistic forces is a snarky film critic that overanalyzes everything, and is generally an arrogant prick. Everyone else in the movie hates him and he's the first (if not only. It's been a while since I watched it) guy to die.

You have seen it, right? That is actually what happens. I am not making any of it up. And, I can understand if you haven't seen it and don't believe me. The only reason I watched it myself is because someone told me a plot synopsis and it sounded like they were making it up. That's how asinine it is.


And, to answer your question, no. If you, personally, said it was a good movie? Given your vehement support in the face of overwhelming evidence, I'd likely take your recommendation with a huge grain of salt.

No.69498
>>69495

A question that can be refuted with a simple "Why the hell should I believe you?" isn't a better question. Your previous one at least included many different (hypothetical) people enjoying the movie.

And how are we taking the plot too literally? M. Night's character was a writer who would go on to write a book that would inspire a great man to become a politician and revolutionize the world, but the author himself would one day be martyred for those ideas, the Lady herself said so.

Not only that, but there *was* a film critic who was constantly portrayed as a arrogant, fussy, know-it-all who not only ended up being wrong in a way that nearly cost The Lady her life, but was also violently killed by the beast.

Argue symbolism or deeper meaning all day, but you have to remember that he chose to show us his artistic intent by those means. Means that happen to coincide with his frustrations regarding the critical shortcomings of his movies at the time (ones that haven't left him yet, I might add.)

No.69501
>>69485
It's quite simple, really. Either pay to see it, or admit that what you're doing is wrong when considered in terms of general societal standards. Whether or not a movie is good, more people than you want to think about put more time than you want to think about into making it, and then you act like you deserve to benefit from their hard work for absolutely nothing.

>>69490
No, dumbass, the entitlement that leads people to think it's perfectly all right to sneak into the theater or download a movie just because they think it's not worth paying to see.

And for the record, you pay for cable, and there's no real reason to think god created shit, or even exists.

No.69504
>>69501

In all honesty, I don't think he cares. I myself don't actually pirate movies and I'm not planning on seeing the film in theaters. Maybe I'll go to a dollar theater so that the movie theater itself is the only real benefactor, but otherwise, even if the movie would turn out great, I and many other fans have reason enough to oppose it, and maybe that's the larger tragedy here.

Maybe it's not a sense of entitlement as much as much as a sort of retaliation against the production/production company for doing what they have with the movie so far. I know at the least, I'm of the opinion that their "hard work" could have been better.

Also, cool it with the whole crap about "God" thing. "That's why God invented X" is a common enough saying, and is applied to many man-made things, you don't have to turn into a hard Atheist just at the use of the phrase.

No.69509
>>69496
>>69498

>[Shyamalan] plays a struggling writer
>[kept down for his ideas]
>big ideas that will inspire another to change the world

>the snarky film critic
>over-analyzes
>arrogant
>fussy
>know-it-all
>[unwelcome to new ideas]

>acknowledge Shyamalan's ballsiness to use his own real image in a film
>leave it at that; Shyamalan is clearly using the film to vent frustrations, there is no deeper meaning
>ham-fisted
>there's no way I'm going to believe there was any thought into the dynamics of the plot than Shyamalan being butthurt


Which one are you most like given this argument: the writer who sees everything but doesn't know how to say it or the critic who only sees what they want and damn everyone else's opinions to hell?

No.69513
>>69509

My own personal qualities are irrelevant, calling them into question doesn't invalidate my central point, especially when it comes to the race controversy. Thinking it somehow will is argumentum ad hominem.

Yes, I am being negative. But if you're seriously asking me that question, asking me to call into question my stance against the movie, perhaps you should call your own status as a staunch defender of this production into question as well.

tl;dr: Screw you, you're not enlightened any more than I am.

No.69518
>>69513

At no point have I defended any decisions made for the film adaptations. You guise are so dedicated to hating everything about this movie that all I have to do to troll you is say something neutral.

No.69519
File: 125489459023.jpg-(87.89KB, 400x600, mex-trollface.jpg)
69519
>>69518

>implying ad-hominem attacks are a 'neutral' stance

No.69522
File: 125489508936.png-(73.06KB, 755x1255, Lol_I_Troll_U.png)
69522
>>69518

...seriously...?

You're seriously saying that?

You...haven't been paying attention to what you've been saying at all, have you?

Is this even the real Ninja? I usually get better responses than that.

(Edit: Pic related. Trolling? Trolling suggests I'm getting angry. Getting an essay from me is certainly impassioned, but it's hardly a trolling response.)

No.69523
>>69496
I've never seen the movie but....WOW that's actually the fucking plot!? ...Just..wow!

No.69526
>>69501

>No, dumbass, the entitlement that leads people to think it's perfectly all right to sneak into the theater or download a movie just because they think it's not worth paying to see.

>And for the record, you pay for cable, and there's no real reason to think god created shit, or even exists.
LOL U mad? If its one thing that makes me laugh my ass off its self righteous little fucking pricks like yourself, who try to act all high and mighty when in fact you're just as hypocritical and full of shit as the rest of the world. The funny part is you don't actually realize just how full of shit you are.

No.69527
>>69509
Grasping at straws again eh, ninja? He's a hack, get over it.

No.69528
>>69501
So bad movies should be supported because people worked hard on them? No. So their hard work should spit in the face of the hard work of everyone that worked on the cartoon? No.

I might not pirate it. I might just completely give up on it entirely. There are things out there that aren't even worth stealing, and interestingly enough a lot of them have been bad movie adaptations.

>>69518
Playing devil's advocate is still forming a defense. Trying to deny that's what you've been doing is downright silly, unless you just want to admit to trolling. That's at least a little more respectable.

And as far as Lady in the Water goes, seeing as how the critic is easily the most popular character from the movie -because he's the one calling Shaymalan in general and the movie's incoherent plot into question- being like him probably isn't a bad thing. I'd sooner be a naysayer than someone egotistical enough to actually cast himself as a martyr whose ideas will lead mankind into a golden age of peace and prosperity.

No.69530
>>69528
>So bad movies should be supported because people worked hard on them?

No, you fucking retard. If you don't want to support, if you're so against it, then don't fucking see it. Period.

If you do see it however, you have to pay for it. If you don't, it's called stealing.

Do I download shit without paying for it, Yes? Does that make me hypocritical, No. Why? Because I know it's wrong and I'm not going into lengthy diatribes trying to defend what I do, or somehow pretend I have he moral high ground. I know i'm in the wrong and I'm not going to make excuses about that.

That's were the whole sense of entitlement comes from that he's bitching about. You don't have some moral right to see the fucking thing for free regardless of it's quality and acting like you do actually makes you the self riotous little prick.

No.69531
>>69530
Oh, then you misunderstand. I know stealing is wrong. I understand seeing this movie without paying for it is wrong. I just don't care. There wouldn't have even been a lengthy discussion on it at all had I just been allowed to say "I'm going to wait for a CAM, fuck them." You're the one that's been dragging this out past its prime and bringing morality into it.

Either way there's no need to resort to name calling. Calm the fuck down.

No.69532
>>69530
>Do I download shit without paying for it, Yes? Does that make me hypocritical, No. Why? Because I know it's wrong and I'm not going into lengthy diatribes trying to defend what I do, or somehow pretend I have he moral high ground. I know i'm in the wrong and I'm not going to make excuses about that.

That's exactly what you're doing. You're saying "It's okay when I steal because I admit it's bad. By admitting stealing is bad, I am not acting like I have a sense of entitlement."

Except you're still doing it. And simply by typing what you have, you've climbed up on a soapbox and started claiming superiority.

I don't think anyone here is saying that stealing is good. I think what's being said is "Yes, stealing is bad. Yes, stealing hurts people. Yes, we want the people it's hurting in this case to get hurt by it."

No.69541
Exactly

No.69546
>>69501
>you act like you deserve to benefit from their hard work for absolutely nothing
>hard work
>Shyamalan
>"I always try to do things with the minimum amount of effort"

LOL

No.69614
Here's a question:

Why do we have a movie thread at all if most people here are dedicated to hating it? Isn't it better to talk about things we like instead of giving ourselves ulcers arguing about things we hate?

I guess what I'm really asking is, based on what we know about this movie so far, and keeping in mind quite a bit of it is rumor and speculation, are you ready to give up on this movie completely or is there still something which can redeem it?

No.69615
>>69614

We have a movie sticky so +/a/ isn't cluttered with shitloads of movie threads. If it bothers you that a lot of people on +/a/ dislike the production because it's a fucking awful disaster, there's always the ignorant bliss of ASN.

No.69626
>>69614
I've been waiting for a Cue Cullen moment from this movie since it was announced. It's not our fault we haven't gotten it, just like it's not our fault we haven't been provided with anything that isn't really hard to be positive about when it comes to this thing being made.

They've given us stuff that, at best, warrants a "It might not be that bad." Nothing that really screams "I must see it because of X". Hopefully when the trailer comes out we'll get that, but all signs are pointing to no, and there's very little we can do about it at this point except continue to hate on it.

No.69627
>>69626

I don't know, man, what could possibly be a "Peter Cullen" moment by now?

The voice actors were specifically forbidden from trying out for the parts, according to Jessie Flower. Mike and Bryan aren't involed any further than their fancy "Excecutive Producer" titles, and even then, Kathleen Kennedy is the one making actual decsions anyway. Sifu Kisu isn't a part of the movie. Hell, he's spoken out against it, and the guy they've got doing what should be his job is the guy that did the fights for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, he's never done a kung fu movie, and he's apparrently also going to play Avatar Roku. Dr. S.L. Lee isn't doing any calligraphy for the movie, like he did for the show, there isn't going to be any Chinese in it at all. None of the writers or directors of the original show are involved, Giancarlo Volpe has also spoken out against the movie.

It's pretty much the opposite of the Transformer's movie situation. Where we totally expected a live-adaptation of a cartoon to be complete different, if only because of the source material's age, but we at least got that one shout-out with Peter Cullen.

I can't fully say right now, the next trailer isn't supposed to come out until Thanksgiving or Christmas, according to Frank Marshall...but I'm making a prediction here: Everything we've seen so far? Is only going to be the tip of the iceberg in terms of things that would make us, and even fans at places like ASN, ask "Why did they do that? Where did that idea even come from?"

No.69632
>>69614
>are you ready to give up on this movie completely or is there still something which can redeem it?

I have given up on this movie ages ago and decided to just stick with the animation. The one thing that could have saved this movie was fight choreography which is important to any film with martial arts. And they didn't even hire the proper people for that job either.( Other than Sifu Kisu, Yuen Woo Ping would have been perfect for that)
When it was first announced that there would be a live action movie i was excited, i pictured something akin to Hero or Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon or Xu Warriors, but with bending. Reality has slapped me in the face and it seems Avatar will be the typical Hollywood adaption. I guess that's my fault for assuming they would stick to the things that made Avatar stand out from other animated series.

No.69633
I don't think a fight coordinator is the same as a choreographer...

No.69638
>>69633

Well there's not much else we can go on. The IMDB page for The Last Airbender doesn't mention a "fight choreographer", it has Cooke and another guy from Indiana Jones 4 as "fight coordinator" and that's it, nothing else mentions fighting. Nobody's listed as a martial arts *anything,* actually, unlike Yuen Wo Ping, who's listed as the fight/martial arts/action choreographer in a number of movies as well as a "coordinator" for others.

No.69648
I really don't see why they needed to go with live action at all. Imagine if they did something similar to what was done with shows like Eva and Gurren Lagann. Make three animated movies based on the three seasons. Cut out the filler, maybe add some new scenes and of course amazingly animated fight scenes featuring god tier animation. Would have been great.

No.69697
File: 125515145893.jpg-(135.57KB, 802x816, Zuko_and_Iroh_inked_by_spacecoyote.jpg)
69697
Hey, remember what I said?

>Everything we've seen so far? Is only going to be the tip of the iceberg in terms of things that would make us, and even fans at places like ASN, ask "Why did they do that? Where did that idea even come from?"

Movie Iroh has dreadlocks.

Source: http://spacecoyote.deviantart.com/art/Zuko-and-Iroh-inked-139721478

No.69698
>>69697
He...He looks like Jesus.

No.69699
>>69698
kinda fits the character

No.69700
>>69699

No, that's Aang. Kung Fu Action Jesus, remember?

No.69751
Iroh more like JACK SPARROW WHAT THE SHIT oh wait that's for the manga maybe it won't be the same in the movie

No.69754
>>69753

Quote from the Artist:

>Movie!Iroh has some awesome dreadlocks. It's weird that he has them, I know. It took me a while to get used to them, too. But man if they aren't fun to draw.

Movie Iroh has dreadlocks.

No.69756
>>69754
you are slow, stop being so slow.

No.69757
>>69756

I 'd made the first post about Dread-head Iroh, I was just pointing out to Ninja that the manga is based on the movie, the artist for the manga gave Iroh dreadlocks, therefore Movie-Iroh has dreads, it's not going to be any different from this to the movie.

No.69762
I'm pretty sure dreadlocks are in complete symbolic opposition to a topknot. But that makes sense given everything else we know about this movie.

No.69782
File: 125523240532.gif-(74.03KB, 377x251, Battlefield_Earth-travolta.gif)
69782
Dreds?

No.69800
>>69782
I thought the world agreed never to talk about that...thing...ever again!

No.69810
File: 125529391378.jpg-(12.80KB, 206x213, RAGEFACE.jpg)
69810
>>69697
>>69754
Wha... what the hell is this?! How can anybody even try to defend the movie now seeing as they've thoroughly butchered it and ruined one of the most beloved characters? THIS IS BAD, THEY SHOULD FEEL BAD.

No.69811
>>69810
>Dreadlocks
>CHARACTER RUINED

....

No.69814
>>69811
It's not just the dreadlocks, it's his entire appearance, plus the whole race issue. When it comes to his actual movie personality, I'm afraid to even guess what they might come up with.

No.69815
I wonder what *did* make them extrapolate "tall, slim, man with chiseled features, a full beard and moustache, and dreadlocks" from "short, stout man, with a rounded face, goatee, large sideburns and top-knot."

No.69816
>>69815
"Wise mentor". They heard "wise mentor", and thought "Jesus".

This is pretty much how their whole process for making the movie went.

No.69817
Honestly, at this stage I no longer care about the fidelity of the movie to the show. And honestly, I think that movie Iroh looks bitchin.

No.69819
>>69817

Yeah, okay, he looks pretty all right. The race controversy is making certain that everybody looks out of place wearing the outfits, and they don't really reflect the show at all anymore, but at the least, the costumes themselves don't look completely ridiculous. It's just too bad he looks like a bitchin' wizard, instead of the Iroh we know.

No.69861
>>69810
Silly. Dreadlocks won't ruin the character.

The shitty Shayalaman story/script most likely will.

No.69888
File: 12553830542.png-(676.81KB, 720x480, Iroh_reaction.png)
69888
>>69817
>And honestly, I think that movie Iroh looks bitchin.

No.69924
>>69815
My guess is they saw Shaun Toub as Ho Yinsen in Iron Man and decided to cast him according to the brown standard set by Dev Patel. The dreadlocks most likely come with the territory. Though I do think they just thought dreadlocks look cool for some reason they do have significance in Hinduism. Its the traditional hairstyle of holy men in India. Dreadlocks are just what naturally happens to your hair when you don't care for it and the ascetics of Hinduism, called sadhu, wore them as an expression of their devotion to their holy practices. Its not in opposition to a topknot, per se, as some sadhu do wear topknots but it, along with Zuko's cropped cut, is incongruous to the Fire Nation's original East Asian-based culture. East Asians traditionally never cut their hair and generally took very good care of it as an expression of their devotion to their ancestors as well as their status in society.

I doubt the resemblance to Jesus was deliberate as they most likely cast Toub without any regard to anything besides his complexion and role in a recently popular movie. But there is at least one precedent in Beowulf: Robert Zemeckis insisted the titular character look like Jesus, believing Christ's face to have a universal appeal. So its certainly possible that they wanted the audience to associate him more with The Carpenter rather than The Walrus. Needless to say, Iroh probably won't be jolly anymore.

No.70053
>>69924

Not sure about that, Toub has described his role as Iroh as being a good wise man. So he's at least going to be his usual good self, just if he's as jolly is indeed up to debate.

Doesn't the hair also contradict Toub's ethnicity if Indian holy men were the inspiration? Toub himself is Jewish, as well as Iranian.

Jesus face or not, I'd have preferred the Abrahamic religions to stay out of this one.

No.70066
My biggest problem with movie Iroh is that he looks too badass and competant. One of the entire points of Iroh's character was that everyone underestimated him. They saw him as a kindly, somewhat foolish old man that loved tea and boardgames and singing -not as the unstoppable one man army Dragon of the West he once was. And part of that is BECAUSE he was a kindly foolish old man that loved tea and boardgames.

Toub looks badass, but it's too readily transparent.

No.70089
I can't believe you guys are still raging over this. For fuck's sake, move on before you've spent more time being angry about the movie than you did enjoying the show.

No.70115
>>70089

I enjoyed the hell out of the show, and that isn't going to change, so I don't see how I can spend more time hating the movie production than liking the show.

You know, when people say stuff like this, it reminds me of the words of one particular woman who was a part of the Top Free protests to be able to walk topless wherever men are allowed to. It was at Venice Beach, I think. She said it to an officer who was following them, ready to arrest her when they made their protest, and he was constantly being derisive, saying "You're not really gonna do this, are you?" Gender issues aren't the same as race issues, but damn if her response wasn't awesome, and actually a little apt regarding people telling me or anyone else to just "get over it."

"Do you even know what conviction means, you asshole?"

No.70118
>>70089
I can't believe people are still complaining about other people complaining. I'd say you're the one who needs to "move on".

No.70132
>>69487
>>If critics and fans love it, would you pay to see it?

A coincidence between critics and fans? Wait, has that ever happened and I missed it?

No.70133
>>69426
No wait, I think I got it now...
Zhao and Ty Lee are based on Ainu people, I bet...

No.70136
>>70133

Not sure if serious.

They're meant to look Chinese or Japanese, since that's what their country is mostly based from, and Zhao had a little bit of Jason Issacs thrown in, since he was Zhao's VA.

Nothing about them says "Ainu," Zhao trims his beard and hair, Ty Lee doesn't have tattoos on her mouth or forearms.

Hell, at this point, Movie!Iroh probablly looks more Ainu by this point.

No.70190
>>70136
Zhao and Ty Lee look as different to other Avatar characters as Ainu look different to other East Asian ethnic groups.
Ainu have lighter skin, hair and eye color than Yayoi/Jomon (Yamato) people. That why Ainu were initially mistaken as from Caucasian origin until DNA tests.
That was my point, but of course, it's just an opinion...

No.70222
fuck yeah movie looks like an awesome remake. style shift is also nice.

No.70228
>>70222
Go back to bed, Shyamalan.

No.70282
LOL

No.70312
Wahhh why are we still having this conversation.

Can't you still kind of look forward to the movie, but then tell people the casting was fucked on an ignorant level on the producer's part/ a marketing flaw.

People hate talking about this in public, and then others dismiss the discussion as just fan assed complaining.

It's stupid. No wonder Sifu Kisu, Mike and Bryan had to sign contracts of silence.

No.70316
File: 125627783390.jpg-(341.22KB, 1024x768, sifu_kisu_smells_bullshit.jpg)
70316
>>70312

>Sifu Kisu

No.70317
>>70312

Sifu Kisu's hardly kept quiet about his dislike for this movie.

And no, I'm not gonna go and just "kind of" look forward to something that actually offends me, and several groups dedicated to equal representation in Hollywood, I have no reason to.

No.70322
>>70312

>Can't you still kind of look forward to the movie
Sure! As soon as i see something i could kinda look forward to, as of yet this simply has not happened. In fact everything i have seen so far makes me hope it doesn't do good enough for a sequel. Why?

Well with all of the fucked up casting and changes to the source material i have seen so far i expect Toph will be a little Blond boy who is def instead of blind. ( the sad thing is people would probably defend a decision such as that) I don't even want to picture how they will no doubt fuck up Azula when its time for her to make an appearance. Every piece of info that come out of this movie leaves me with one singular thought, KILL IT WITH FIRE!

No.70324
>>70322

Nobody would defend a male, deaf Toph.

But really; everything that can possibly be said about this movie has already been said! Why not just let it die? Don't go if you don't want to; nobody's forcing you. If it pisses you off so much, then why are you still talking about it?

No.70325
File: 125629103696.jpg-(33.56KB, 480x352, OTP.jpg)
70325
>>70324

Deaf, for the most part this latest movie thread is filled with posts asking the same question of people opposed to the casting (why are you still talking about it?). Naturally, people opposed to the casting will respond with their views and why they won't give Paramount their money to see this film. Of course, this leads to an argument. Until we get some new movie info, discussion will follow this 1 -> 2 -> 3 ->1 formula.

When the new trailer hits, the rage fires will be stoked to a white-hot heat. But this round of standard /co/ style rage will be served with a healthy topping of Hollywood institutionalized racism. Mmmm-mmmmm, bitch.

No.70326
>>70325
I was kind of hoping to make it go 1 ->2 ->3 ->1 ->2 -> 5 by throwing a curveball; asking, instead of 'why are you bitching', 'why do you think I care that/why you're bitching'.

No.70346
>>70326

Sorry Deaf, but you kinda need the 4 to progress, and you didn't really give much of one. In my case, keeping quiet means people are going to stay unaware of what's happened. Remember, I'm in this as somebody trying to boycott the film as a protest for the casting choices. Staying quiet means staying complacent and allowing this to happen, unabated, to other franchises (which it has, to at least 3 others just this year.)

In any case, it's like Murph said, people keep giving me the same arguments and excuses, and I often have to give the same answers. With so little to go on so far, what else can be done?

No.70357
>>70346
Well, I can understand that, but I think by now everyone on this board at least understands why people object to this movie and why they are going so far as to boycott it.

Me, I'm maintaining a cautious optimism that's fueled mostly by the realization from day 1 that this is NOT THE CARTOON and nothing they could have done would have made it more or less NOT THE CARTOON. The cartoon itself isn't changed or affected at all by it, so why get angry? I understand why you might be offended by the casting. That alone isn't enough to piss me off since I realize that how they look is really no way to judge their performance. I'm not sitting here and saying the casting is perfect, far from it, but I'm not going to condemn it until at least I've seen a full trailer.

Also, I realize for all we know about this movie there's so much we don't know. We don't know what's rumor and what isn't, and all we can be sure of is a few sets and some characters in costume. We don't know what Appa and Momo will look like or what plot elements will be included or if anything we've heard about the script is true. We just don't know and until we do, how can we make an informed opinion?

I guess I'm saying that no arguments anyone makes right now would be enough to convince me not to see this movie just like no argument I or anyone else could make would convince the detractors to see the movie. So why are we even talking about it?

No.70358
>>70357
>Well, I can understand that, but I think by now everyone on this board at least understands why people object to this movie and why they are going so far as to boycott it.

I don't, so it's not going to be exactly like the animated series

big fucking whoop.

No.70360
>>70357

Probably for the simple fact that there are always people I can inform about this movie who were completely in the dark about it, which I've actually done at a convention and around my campus.
Look, we know the kids have a decent chance of pulling off a good performance, we know there were going to be changes, not just from the format, but we knew there had to be big huge sweeping changes for the whole series to work in movie format. We know it's not the show (this actually *can* affect the show's franchise, even if the show itself is left alone.) That's honestly not the damn problem.

The casting controversy keeping me and many others from possibly enjoying or supporting any of this is actually a tragedy on it's own.

Honestly, if you aren't pissed off at the casting because you figure they might still do a good job, you're missing the whole point of the protest.

Your words now, and your defense of the casting choices against allegations of racism on YouTube earlier, only tell me that you don't understand why people are angry over the casting, or it shows you just don't care.

No.70366
>>70357
>>70358
Since you guys don't seem to get what the "big fucking whoop" is. Read this:
http://derekkirkkim.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-day-in-politics-same-old-racist.html

It's an older link, but it pretty much sums up why most of the people again this movie are, well, against this movie.

No.70367
>>70366
I'm not going to boycott a movie because you interpret them changing ethnicity as racism just as much as I didn't boycott Shadow Complex because the creator hates the gays.

No.70368
I think that the boycotters need to realize that no matter how bad the movie seems like it's going to be. No matter how many bad reviews it gets from both fans and critics? No matter how what they change or how poor the acting is? There are still going to be people that watched the original series that are going to go see it.


The racism in the casting offends me, but frankly, so does all this blind hope that Shaymalan knows what he's doing when his track record shows just the opposite.

No.70370
>>70367

"Interpret" nothing, Hollywood has a long track record for doing this, one that's still getting longer, even after Airbender.

(By the way, Shadow Complex itself doesn't contain any references to homosexuality. Orson Scott Card's stance is unfortunate, and is an important issue, but there's a difference between actual discrimination or making a work that condones or furthers discrimination, and holding a shitty, uneducated viewpoint. Be thankful the main writer behind the actual game was the very liberal Peter David, and that Card's lack of compassion didn't leak into the game itself.)

>>70368

For what it's worth, even outside of the casting, I think he's royally screwing it up in ways we haven't even *begun* to see, and I highly doubt any of the kids outside of Dev Patel can actually act. Crocodile tears from statements like T-shirt Boy's up there don't help much, either.

No.70376
>>70370
>"Interpret" nothing, Hollywood has a long track record for doing this, one that's still getting longer, even after Airbender.

my point still stands. why should I care?

No.70380
>>70376
Because by their alienating entire races when it comes to casting, you're missing out on hundreds of potentially great actors and performances.

In return, you're getting relative nobodies like Peltz and Rathbone, or pasty faced star search contestants like Noah Ringer. The latter is especially an example of what the problem is, as there are at least two Asian kids with twice as much professional acting AND twice as much Martial Arts experience that could have been cast as Aang but weren't considered.

That is what the problem is.

No.70385
>>70380

>weren't considered

Nice assumption.

No.70387
>>70385
The casting call said that Caucasian actors were preferred.

No.70388
>>70385

Casting calls that don't have a preference for race, don't specify race. The casting calls for all four leads in this movie said "caucasian or any other ethnicity."

It's great when people say "Anybody can apply!" but it's not the same as "Anybody can apply, especially Caucasians!"

As is, Shyamylan admitted he chose Rathbone for his kung fu tape, they specifically flew in McCartney and Rathbone, and there's still the (admittedly unconfirmed) possibility that Peltz was chosen thanks to her daddy's immense wealth.

Consider how the initial lead cast was 100% white. Consider Hollywood's almost dogmatic aversion to Asians in lead roles, and the studio's continued refusal to address any of these concerns.

I don't think it's difficult to see what their priorites were.

No.70389
>>70387
>>70388

>why yes, that is a nice assumption

No.70390
File: 125644005091.jpg-(147.21KB, 450x306, casting.jpg)
70390
>>70389
Assumption my ass! Here's a copy of the actual casting call that went out.

Speaking of ass, stop talking out yours.

No.70391
>>70389

Yup, you caught me! It's nothing but an assumption, not like I'm basing any of my opinions off actual studies, testimonials from people in show business, or the stance of groups and people that have been fighting this sort of crap since the day they were formed.

No.70392
>>70360
No, I do get it. I just don't think it's that big a deal.

Look, everyone or almost everyone on the original show was Asian. I accept that point. And you're upset that those Asian characters are now being played by people of different ethnicities. But frankly, I'd be more pissed off about it if the majority of actors in this movie were actually white. In point of fact, they aren't. Sure, three major roles in the film are white people, but practically ever other major role is not. In fact, there are a wide range of ethnicities in the cast. So, frankly, I don't see what's to get upset about. Is it because the white people are good guys and the brown people are bad guys? Anyone who's familiar with Avatar should know that Zuko would probably be the best part for an actor to play. So when you think about it, Shyamalan gave the best part in the movie to an Indian actor. And of course of the heels of that, the whole Fire Nation has to be brown or it makes no sense.

>>70388
The "initial lead cast" doesn't matter, though. It's not what's going to be in the final film. Based on that, yes, everyone would have been white and I'd be right alongside you boycotting. But THAT CHANGED!!! That is NO LONGER THE CASE!!! In case you haven't got it from my all-caps, I'm a little frustrated that people are still upset about McCartney being in this movie when MCCARTNEY ISN'T IN THIS MOVIE!!! The cast is no longer all white, it isn't even mostly white, so, again, I say, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?!!

(Knowing full well I'm not going to change your opinion, but hoping you will understand mine [without thinking I'm stupid or racist or intentionally malicious as I've been accused of being])

No.70394
File: 125644552684.jpg-(17.29KB, 360x286, 20070501 Filmfest Tribute Mako.jpg)
70394
>No, I do get it. I just don't think it's that big a deal.

See this guy? This is Mako, voice of Iroh. He co-founded the East West Players so he can fight against the hollywood racism bullshit you dismiss so easily. He would kick you square in the balls right now if he were still alive.

You seriously have no idea how ignorant you appear right now.

No.70400
>>70392
So wait, let me get this straight. You actually think it now comes across as less racist because it's now a movie about a world full of Asians (and other non-Caucasians) and the only ones who can save these poor backward barbarians from themselves are the magical white people?

Really?

Also;
> The cast is no longer all white, it isn't even mostly white, so, again, I say, WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL?!!

The BIG DEAL is that they've still gone through great pains to remove almost all the Asian influence from the show. Which, if you may recall, was the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD the show was set in.

It's a huge slap in the face to Asian American and all Asians in general.

Did Peter Jackson have to add more ethnicity to "deversify" "Lord of the Rings"? Then why the fuck should they have to do it to "Last airbender"?

No.70402
Of course there's something wrong.
People just don't want to acknowledge it.

No.70403
>>70392

Why the hell have you fallen back on an old argument, one I thought I had already addressed, for that matter?

Hollywood has absolutely no problem with putting minorities in general, not just Asians, as side-characters and villains, it's putting them into lead roles where they balk. The constant message that you have to be white to be the hero is the prevailing problem here.

Actually make an attempt to understand that more often than not, minority actors don't get to be the heroes of the movie. They're constantly relegated to being people in the background, being the villains, the comedic and ineffectual sidekicks, the hopeless romantic interest who never has a chance, the people needing saving, the people needing teaching, the people who look up to or worship the hero.

The fact that our main heroes are all white is the major goddamn problem here because now it's up to them to take on the world. To teach the Northern Water Tribe that women are equal, to defeat the genocidal Imperialistic Fire Nation, to free Ba Sing Se from it's own corruption, to inspire Kyoshi Island to stop being so isolationist and help the world, to save Omashu and it's King.

Our (now) white heroes have to go and teach the world of "others" right from wrong, solve it's problems, and save it from itself.

The original choice of Jessie McCartney needs to be remembered specifically because it's something they changed. When faced with obvious criticism they took the opportunity to hire an "ethnic" antagonist, while not addressing the whole problem, then padding themselves on the back for it all.

That's a false apology at best. This isn't saying "Yes, we understand, let us fix this" it's saying "I'm sorry you're making such a big deal of this."

It's insulting

Do you honestly think "Well everybody *else* isn't white" is somehow addressing this? Do you honestly think that it isn't somehow the problem itself?

No.70408
McCartney couldn't attend the boot camp prior to filming because of his musical tour. Patel was one of the first people contacted to audition specifically for the role.

Unless you want to call Shyamalan an outright liar.

No.70410
>>70408

According to a radio interview shortly after the initial cast was announced, McCartney was already attending 'ninja boot camps' (his words) in preparation for the role. A few weeks later, he pulled out due to 'scheduling conflicts'.

This indicates one or more of the following:

-McCartney has a shitty agent who forgot an entire concert tour schedule. Resulting in his sudden jettison from the production.
-McCartney has a really smart agent who didn't want his client involved in the controversy. So he pulled him out of the production, falling back on the tour schedule as an excuse.
-The Producers read up on the controversy and made a tepid attempt to appease the protest with fresh-off-his-Oscar Dev Patel as the main antagonist of the film.

Which is it?

No.70411
>>70410

I'm leaning more towards McCartney calling preliminary training "ninja boot camp."

No.70413
  >>70411

Nice try, McCartney talked about training with a 'double sabre sword set' in the interview. Preliminary, my ass.

No.70414
>assuming I care about cultural influence, discrimination in movie roles or Mako's political views at all.

>Implying that M Night Shebangbang is using the movie to discriminate against the Asians and not to simply laugh at white people by casting them as primitive Ice monkeys and mountain dwelling self righteous jerks while casting his own ethnicity as an advanced forward moving industrial age superpower.

No.70416
File: 125645337649.jpg-(11.26KB, 327x388, hurpdurp.jpg)
70416
>>70414

>implying

No.70417
>>70415
way to not actually say anything to counter me.

>>70416
way to attack the phrasing and not my point.

No.70419
>>70417

Way to come up with a stupid and completely tangential point in the first place while the grown ups were talking.



MainFAQ[ baw / sug ][ cog / jam / rad / tv ][ ck / coc / draw / writ ][ a / co / coq/ pco ][ n ][ dw ]