|
>>
|
No. 147100
>zanehatestomatoes asked: I'm kind of interested in a discussion about the post that ended with: "And the two white people in the game are the tokens. And they play their token role quite well, I think!" I'm just curious, because this sounds like a "bullying-the-bully" mentality which isn't always the most conducive to change or what you guys sound like you're trying to do. Are you sure the best idea is to turn the tables so much that you lose the idea of equal representation you were searching for to begin with?
>I’m sorry, it seems that you had the idea that this was about equal representation in itself. No no, sorry. It’s about equalizing this game with all the other games on the market which are distinctly and primarily tokenizing, fetishizing, and unequal. :)
=======================================
>nathandrakeismylover asked: I was all down with a queer-inclusive game for people of all races, genders, orientations, creeds, etc. But your response to zanehatestomatoes caught me by surprise. It looks like you intend to marginalize (white) folks based on their identities. That's not inclusive at all. If ARKH is not about equal representation, I'll keep looking for a game that is.
>Nowhere do we say Arkh is inclusive of ALL races, genders, orientations and creeds. It says it has a focus on queer identities and people of color, two groups that get little to zero representation in any other game. If you want to see white and straight people, play any of the other million games on the market. If you want to see mostly white people and a couple of token queers and PoC, again, there are several of those games on the market.
>Your issue seems to be that you are upset that white and straight people will be the minority, the tokens, the minor characters, for the first time ever in their entire lives, and frankly, that’s quite racist of you, and this game is not here for your enjoyment, or the enjoyment of anyone who thinks like you, anyway.
>And the entire idea that you think white people can be marginalized based on their being white pretty much makes your white supremacist ideologies clear.
>Now have a lovely day.
=================================
>zanehatestomatoes asked: I in no way was requesting the white characters needed to have a major role, I was just wary of the idea of tokenism at all. Based on your later posts, we have different definitions of "token", mine being a character placed solely to pander to that group without serving a real purpose to the story, rather than it just meaning "minor". I am wholeheartedly in support of balancing out what characters are included in mainstream gaming, but language creating sides just exacerbates the problem.
>There are sides here. You are either for the stopping of oppression, or you aren’t. It’s as simple as that. Neutrality doesn’t exist for PoC, and I’m not going to let white people get away with the idea that it does.
===============================
and because I don't want to just wall of text all of this here is a link to the next part
http://thearkhproject.tumblr.com/post/15326734037/im-offended-to-be-referred-to-as-racist-now-when
Not making themselves look real good.
Is it just me or does their argument resemble the argument fox news gives to justify calling themselves fair and balanced?
>"Well yeah we have a big conservative bias, but we can still call ourselves fair and balanced because we're just counteracting the big liberal bias in the rest of the media!"
|